There are pros and cons between both individual rights and public order, but which hold more usefulness in society that protects privacy. As a society we accept the individual rights as a claim on independency. The mi their individual rights are inclined to add disorder on public order, which I believe it holds some amount of disadvantages to certain societies of the world. Public order is in space to keep the collective as an entirety safe-haven from any wrongdoings. Public order is also a system in place that limits some freedoms that people desire. Freedoms is the epitome of life that everyone can take advantage of no matter the cause. Public order is abstaining from any acts of complicity that may lead to violence, which may be disrupting, while out in the world or any other acts or conduct that may be illegal. For example, disturbance in public order often times results in hindering someone else of their individual rights. Public order has been contemplated that disrupting the public in a way that may make being in the public is unsafe.When breaching public order, it is considered an illegal act, and can lead to jail time and or paying a fine if a conviction is acquired. Nevertheless the actual consequence to pay actually lands on the shoulders of society as our individual rights are contravene upon when public order is, well, not in order. As a citizen we grasp the knowledge that we have individual rights and those rights come with having or sustaining public order. As Individuals living in an American society we all have individual rights. Our individual rights are our virtues that expound and validates our freedom of relevance in a social America.
All the rest of the rights come with consequences or fine print. Our individual rights are there to equally provide us life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in this world of social America. They exist to give people his or her freedoms, while that same freedom can allow people to take advantage of their freedoms. Freedom is the item that keeps the people of this country happy. People feel secure in what they are doing during their everyday lives. A person’s individual rights are what keep people happy throughout his or her life. People are given various rights that make them feel happy and appreciated even if they do not recognize them. Individual rights are freedoms that let people choose who they want to be and also give them the fair usage of that they deserve to get as a citizen. Individual rights are the rights that people are given to keep them from being mistreated by the government or anyone else. Also most of these rights are to keep the people from being mistreated by the justice system. Our individual rights are mostly summed up within the first Ten Amendments, otherwise known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights helps to protect the citizens of this country. According to the National Constitution Center, 2008 “Nearly two-thirds of the Bill of Rights is devoted to safeguarding the rights of persons suspected or accused of crime”. These rights are outlined in the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth amendments. They give people the right to “due process of law, fair trial, and freedom from self-incrimination, cruel and unusual punishment and being held in jeopardy twice for the same crime. National Constitution Center, (2008) Take for instance the first Amendment, it protects freedom of speech, press, religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; the right for people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of a grievance. (Bill of Rights, 2000-2009) The upper hand of having this right was so that society could peaceably seek out about the injustices of the country without being penalized or harm for doing so. This amendment allows the press to question people of a certain caliber and also ask questions that the world wants to know about. It also has the advantage of helping aid in speaking out when there has been an injustice to others and yourself. The disadvantage though is that, if expressing your first amendment right becomes violent, you can face jail time and pay possible fines.
This deranges the public order. If people happen to be apart of an organization or mainstream an event, they may have law enforcement officials surround them for the protection of others and for that particular organization most of the time the protection is for the other people and to keep outsiders from deterring any events. This is where public order comes in to play. It also poses a disadvantage because the area that the organization is acting or addressing their first amendment right in cannot disrupt others who may have to cross paths through or around the organization. The area must remain safe and sufficient for all if not then the involvement of the law will commence.
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
There is not complete freedom in expressing the individual right because it could affect public order. The advantages to having individual rights are being able to express yourself and be treated equally among society. However, the disadvantage is that the right you carry is limited according to what effect expressing it will have on society. Without public order, many of our rights would not carry the same significance. Public order places a boundary on our individual rights, but it is a boundary that is “for our own good”. If every right that is outlined for us had no boundaries or restrictions on it, our society would end up in chaos.
Like mentioned before, our rights contain fine print that not everyone reads when signing on the dotted line. This fine print is what keeps public order while still allowing us to retain our rights we believe we are entitled to. Unfortunately, many people out there are not concerned with public order and only care about expressing and practicing their own rights with no regard to what effect it may or may not have on anybody else. Others are more concerned with public order and public safety, that they support rules or laws that put up invisible walls that box our rights in.
They cannot wander free for fear of devastation or destruction to our society. Regardless of a particular point of view, we believe that anyone in a fair and honest discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of individual rights verses public order can see the advantages of embracing our proclaimed rights in America as well as the disadvantages and being able to admit the advantages and disadvantages of how American goes about maintaining public order.
Stuck on your essay?
