To determine what the inconsistencies are in human behavior and motivations, and what it is that makes understanding them both quite complex, we must begin by analyzing and studying the vast range of human experiences. Both George Orwell’s 1984 (Novel) written in 1949 and psychological experiment, The Stanford Prison Experiment (film/experiment) delve into how society reacts to an individual/ group that are in a position of power and have the strength and capability to control the public. In George Orwell’s novel 1984, there are multiple ways the leaders (Big Brother) of the dystopian society control the people and domain, a domain which comprises of war, consistent government observation, chronicled negationism and purposeful publicity. Meanwhile, The Stanford Prison Experiment was a watched analysis led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo at Stanford University and later got adjusted into a movie in 2015 directed by Kyle Patrick Alvarez, which endeavored to research the mental impacts of apparent power, concentrating on the battle among detainees and officials investigates what happens when power can never again be controlled and what befalls the practices and psyches of the individuals being controlled.
George Orwell’s perspective on the idea of Independence and Identity in his novel 1984 can be seen through its powerful mental control strategies, the Party pulverizes all feeling of freedom and distinction. Everybody wears a similar garment, eats a similar nourishment, and lives in the equivalent grungy condos. Independent ideas be taboo, as it may prompt disobedience. This subject reaches a critical stage during Winston's torment, when Winston contends that he is a man, and on the grounds that he is a man O'Brien can't reveal to him what he thinks. Also, O'Brien recommends that this freedom is proof of madness. O'Brien's view speaks to the virtue of an authoritarian system, in that free idea must be obliterated to advance the necessities and objectives of the Party. Winston and Julia's destruction happens because they accept they are uncommon. Their capture and torment, be that as it may, breaks this soul. Indeed, through this extreme loss of individual idea, we witness Orwell's admonition against grasping any adaptation of authoritarian principle. Orwell also describes life being uniform and deliberate. Nobody can stick out, and nobody can be remarkable. To have a free idea verges on being villainous. Hence, composing, for example, Winston does in his journal has been prohibited. Individuals are just allowed to think what the Party instructs them to think, which prompts is what Syme describes as “duckspeak.” By depicting Independence and Individuality as something that is unethical and taboo, it leaves us to address what our reality would resemble in the event where we wouldn’t have Individuality and it was illicit to do regular things, for example, composing and in any event, thinking incorrectly. Nonetheless, even though there are many things that are disapproved of, Winston still has the insubordinate mentality and proceeds to write in his diary which gives him a feeling of distinction inside himself.
The Stanford Prison Experiment investigates a tremendous scope of human experiences, yet the most unmistakable one is that of authority and power. Much like Orwell's 1984, there are figures in power and control (prison guards) which controlled the less fortunate (detainees). The film is an exceptional and realistic film that delineates exactly how merciless someone who believes they have a large amount of power can be. The experiment/films main idea comprises of volunteer understudies accepting jobs of detainees and gatekeepers, going off the rails. The 'protects' transformed rapidly into horrendous twisted people, utilizing their newly discovered capacity to torment and mishandle their charges, while many 'detainees' began to show indications of a total mental breakdown. The principle thought of the film is to extend the possibility that when customary individuals are given no limits, exactly how far they will go with their abrupt position in power, they even alluded to the prisoners as numbers not individuals.. The frightening thing about this film is that on the off chance that we paid attention to its exercises, we would reevaluate something beyond our jail framework. We would reexamine the entire arrangement of government. The significant aftereffects of the investigation can be outlined as: a considerable lot of the ordinary, sound counterfeit detainees endured such serious passionate pressure responses that they had to be discharged within a few days, a large portion of different detainees acted like zombies absolutely complying with the belittling requests of the watchmen; the trouble of the detainees was brought about by their feeling of frailty incited by the gatekeepers who started acting in brutal, dehumanizing and even cruel ways. The examination was ended rashly because it was spiraling out of power in the degree of corrupting activities being executed by the watchmen against the detainees - every one of whom had been typical, solid, conventional youthful undergrads exactly seven days prior. That is the thing that makes the human experience of authority and power very mind boggling, it can change someone's entire attitude and when the power is removed, we are left with a covetous, customary individual.
To compare both pieces, we understand that both are frightfully similar in methods for their controlling nature and detainee progress. The regular citizens in 1984 are for the most part leveled out by the figure in control, Big Brother, except for Winston of course who acts quite rebellious towards some of the conventions put into place by the government, while the detainees in The Stanford Prison Experiment are constrained by various figures in control and there is just a single prisoner who faces this group in control and must be assessed so as to be discharged from a 'reenactment'. Something that George Orwell conveys successfully in 1984 is the technique of Symbolism. There are many examples of symbolism in the novel, but a very prominent one is that of the telescreens. The telescreens symbolize how extremist government manhandles innovation for its very own finishes as opposed to misusing its information to improve human progress. The inescapable telescreens are the book's most noticeable image of the Party's consistent observing of its subjects. In their double capacity to blast steady promulgation and watch residents. A case of symbolism in The Stanford Prison Experiment is calling and naming the detainees as numbers and not individuals, and when requested to be called by their name, the watchmen carry on in a vicious and cruel manner, for instance, making them live in their own defecation and mishandling them in crazy manners.