Illegal Immigration: Should it be Legal?

Trump has strong opinions on illegal immigration, should Australia follow… or not?

There has been a recent spark in the public interest of the subject of illegal immigration, most attribute it to the said radical views of the President of the US: Donald J. Trump. There is a lot of controversy especially on his proposal to build a giant wall along the US-Mexico border to “keep out the illegal aliens”. Who allegedly “cost the Americans upwards of $200 billion per year”. This makes us wonder, what is illegal immigration, what are some views on it and what is its impact on a country.

Some questions which might be asked could include: ‘Is all immigration good?’, ‘Should there be restrictions on immigration?’ and ‘Should there be no immigration?’ all of which will need a great deal of insight to form an expert opinion. And for an expert opinion, experts need to be asked. “We're all human beings, we're all mammals, we're all rocks, plants, rivers” – Shane MacGowan

Shane MacGowan, an English-born Irish vocalist said that, “People are talking about immigration, emigration and the rest of the f***ing thing. It's all f***ing crap. We're all human beings, we're all mammals, we're all rocks, plants, rivers. F***ing borders are just such a pain in the f***ing a**e.” Obviously being very vocal about the issue shows his opinion to be suggesting that he thinks that countries shouldn’t have borders as he claims they just cause problems. George Lincoln Rockwell

George Lincoln Rockwell an American neo-Nazi who also had definite views at an interview about Alex Haley said, “A leopard doesn't change his spots just because you bring him in from the jungle and try to housebreak him and turn him into a pet. He may learn to sheathe his claws in order to beg a few scraps off the dinner table, and you may teach him to be a beast of burden, but it doesn't pay to forget that he'll always be what he was born: a wild animal.” His strong opinion says to everyone that he is totally against immigration of any kind for at least people coming from jungles to America, he also states that, “Evolution shows that in the long run, if the superior mixes with the inferior, the product is halfway between, and inferior to what you started with in the original superior group - in other words, mongrelized.” Hinting fervently that races should not mix, enforcing his opinion that people should not immigrate.

Contrary to that Reni Eddo-Lodge (British journalist and author) acknowledges, in her book ‘Why I'm No Longer Talking to White People About Race’ about her personal experience, that “Being constantly looked at like an alien in the country you were born in requires true tolerance.” And that the problem that is within her country is caused by immigration’s policies in Britain. Some might argue against her pointing out that the title of her book rules out white people and not helping the separation. “(Mass immigration is a) threat to the character of the country.” – Jared Taylor

More moderate Jared Taylor (American editor) explains in depth in his own book ‘White Identity: Racial Consciousness in the 21st Century’ explains his views on immigration, “Prosperous non-white nations such as Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea… would quickly be filled with foreigners.” “… if those countries opened their borders… “ He goes on to give different examples of if different countries did let in many people it would not be the same as is can’t with different. Taylor then follows up with (Israel) mentioning, “In 2010, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved tough measures to deport illegal immigrants, calling them a “threat to the character of the country.” Reinstating that the country cannot be the same with different people. Taylor reinforces the statement about Israel with Japan demonstrating that it does not have as large problems with race as it has, “… no Civil Rights Commission or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. It has no Equal Housing Act or Voting Rights Act. No one worries about drawing up voting districts to make sure minorities are elected.” Just to name a few that are showcased in the book. This goes to express thoroughly his belief on how much immigration western countries should allow. Some individuals do call his sentiments racist and the words in this book can give off that type of feel. “Street movements began to talk of all arrivals into Europe as ‘rapefugees’.” – Douglas Murray

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

Place Order

Cool-headed Douglas Murray (British author) finds examples and experiences in his own life that could support either worldview and tends to balance them in his book ‘The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam’, he recounts his experience, “In the wake of Cologne and other similar attacks one could hear the language deteriorate around the fringes. Street movements began to talk of all arrivals into Europe as ‘rapefugees’. In Paris I met an elected official who referred to all migrants as ‘refu-jihadists’.” He describes is feeling towards this by continuing with, “These were unamusing as well as insulting terms for anybody who knew first hand that some at least of the people who had come were fleeing rape or escaping jihad.” This proves he indeed has empathy for the immigrants. In the same book he warns that, “A continent which imports the world's peoples will also import the world's problems.” Implying that it would not be good for anyone for a country to have open borders receiving an unknown population of people. “In Paris I met an elected official who referred to all migrants as ‘refu-jihadists’.” – Douglas Murray

The Australian situation with illegal immigration can relate to much with what Murray has said in his book and the immigration could be viewed as too much or too little. According to the ABS (Australia Bureau of Statistics) the majority of illegals in Australia were visa overstays contrary to popular belief, 53 900 estimated as of 30 June 2010 (0.2% of the population). Although it is to be noted that Australia is surrounded by sea, making it much more difficult to cross its border opposite to countries connected by land who are vulnerable to land crossings. With a large portion less for other entrants –13 770 Refugee and Humanitarian entrants per year. On a broader scale is US illegal immigrants in 2016 is estimated to have 10.7 million (3.3% of the population) making it a greater worry to US citizens and legal immigrants as well as illegal. 0.2% of Australia’s population are visa overstays

Immigrants can have a very positive impact on the economy of a country, for example immigrants in America are 15% more likely to work unusual hours than US born workers and also more likely to be employed in dangerous jobs. This can be looked at as positive as it relieves the US born workers from working at times and conditions they would not like to work at. Excluding legal immigrants, immigrants are more likely to work for less making it easier for their boss to progress financially with their business as well as providing better services for the customer and chance to use the money more liberally.

Illegal immigration can be a negative impact on the economy, workers fine with working for less will put other workers out of work and can lower wages of people who needed the previous wage to keep themselves going. Vast amounts of immigration can indicate great negative impacts on a country. A tremendous flow of people can increase of scarcity of resources and the infrastructure becomes overburdened. It also results in a negative impact on the individual, including unemployment and shortage of affordable housing. Mass immigration needs to house much more people which increases environmental degradation in a specific area, using up earth’s resources completely in one area. This gives no chance to the flora and fauna to bear the globalisation burden easily.

A lot of people would argue that it is morally right to let whoever wants to come into the country to do so. There has been many a story about a family with children or just children fleeing from a conflict such as a devastating war or abusive relatives. The family gets to a border of a country that they have heard is much safer and also wealthier, but they are unable to escape their pain because the border security of that country will not let them in as they are trying to enter illegally. This is particularly heart wrenching when the children get separated from their parents.

But people also argue the other way, saying there should be restricted access to a country. Many compared it to home with walls and a lockable door and the reason for having a wall is to stop unwanted visitors, like robbers, kidnappers and even murderers. The owner of the house decides who they will let into the house or not and if they choose to let anyone into their house, they will suffer the consequences. But most people choose the people they want to let in are only their friends and family.

Either way could go, letting everyone into a country or keeping everyone out of a country, or even somewhere in between, like letting only people who are known to be representing what the countries values are.