Justification of Euthanasia: Giving People the Right to Die Peacefully
Euthanasia is the assisted dying of giving people the right to die peacefully in people who are terminally ill or not experiencing their fullest life. euthanasia is all about letting the ill keep their dignity and having a peaceful death and limiting pain and suffering
During the last century, medicine has improved and the acceptance of these diseases and disabilities “it has become normal”. In saying this there are still many sicknesses that can’t be cured but also cause extreme pain to people who have them. Patients with sickness like this should have the choice of euthanasia because life as everyone should agree should be the most amazing gif of all people should be happy. But still, countries of today believe this is immoral or illegal.
In our world today many sicknesses can give intolerable pain mentally or physically. An example of such disease is the locked-in syndrome people who have locked down can’t move any muscles. One of the people how had to deal with this is, Tony Nicklinson, in 2010 was denied his right to be euthanized by the British High Court. As Tony was unable to even move his tongue or eyeballs let lone kill himself and as the quality of his life worsened, Tony starved himself to death and died in 2012. This is not acceptable by any means of any human decency or compassion to one another people’s rights and wishes its tony life and Tony’s body and he was denied that birth is given right. Tony’s family had to deal with him dying with no dignity also in pain. This is just one in an uncountable number of people with a disease like this and in this position
But the people against euthanasia still argue that this is wrong and in just that a cure could come out even the euthanasia 86% of the time shortens the life of the patient by a mouth or a couple of weeks or hours even
Besides, it is cruel and in just to keep people terminally ill alive. And at the same time, there is no proof that diseases such as locked-in syndrome or brain cancer will be cured in the near further
And as much as it is easy to keep people clinically alive someone being kept alive by a machine is not living. Is it not like torture? Assurances and promises that there will be a cure someday do not deny the fact that doctors (and relatives of an ill person) consciously keep a patient in pain and humiliation for an undetermined period. Doing this violates several individuals’ rights and should not be tolerated.
99% of the cases of euthanasia are justified. Some diseases cause severe suffering; sometimes, a patient might try to commit suicide to end this suffering; life for such patients is worse than death. Euthanasia is not killing; its letting people with there dignity—according to the statistics, patients usually ask for euthanasia a maximum of one week before they would die. Also, keeping a person alive against their will and making him or her withstand pain and suffering is not different from torture, and thus should not be allowed: if a patient wants to die, and his or her condition is truly hopeless, relatives, doctors, and the law should not prevent them from doing so.
The care of human life and happiness and not their destruction is the first and only legitimate object of good government. (Thomas Jefferson) In our day-to-day life we often come across terminally-ill patients that are bedridden and are totally dependent on others. It is actually hurts their sentiments. Looking at them one must say death would be a better option for them rather than living such a painful life; which is painful physically as well as psychologically. But if one...
In the world today, there are trials in life that really cross our ethical boundaries. One of the example is medical challenges. Euthanasia is also called mercy killing for someone who is terminally ill or for somebody who is suffering from a disease that is painful and cannot be cured. This act of killing is in a painless way in order for the person to die with diignity. Euthanatos is a Greek word of the term euthanasia which means good...
We all know death is an inevitable part of life. In the olden time, most people died at home but currently the majority of deaths are happening either in a hospital or a nursing home. With recent changes in technology, we can either delay or bring the person back to life. Dr. Schimke indicated, “for almost any life-threatening condition, some form of intervention can now delay the moment of death” (Schimke, 1986). The right to natural death is basically any...
Introduction If you think you have a say in what happens to your body, then you’re wrong. We spend our whole lives making decisions that shape our life and it’s entirely up to us, but when it comes time for us to die, we don’t even get a say in the matter. It should be our right to die when we want and how we want because after all, it is our body and our life. The debate on Euthanasia...
Introduction In the United States, the right to die is a controversial and often emotional topic. There are two main sides to the argument: those who believe that people have the right to end their lives when they are suffering from a terminal illness or are in pain, and those who believe that this is a decision that should be made by the individual’s family or doctor. There are many factors to consider when taking a side on this issue....
Right to Die Which is referred In Gian Kaur’s case, is whether a ‘right to die with dignity as part of a ‘right to live with dignity in the context of article 21? The court observed: A question may arise, in the context of a dying man who is terminally ill or in a PVS THAT HE MAY BE PERMITTED to terminate it by a premature extinction of his life in those circumstances. This category of cases may fall within...
Imagine, you have just been diagnosed with an inoperable brain tumour. The doctor tells you that you have less than six months to live and that your time remaining will be extremely painful and you will likely encounter severe seizures and horrific bouts of daily vomiting in the months before your body finally surrenders to death. Would you wonder if there was a quicker way for the living nightmare to end? Would you want the right to choose the way...
While killing someone in an attempt to defend ‘self’ is acceptable by law, mercy killing is seen as an act that is highly immoral in nature. The motive of euthanasia is to ‘aid-in-dying’ painlessly and thus should be considered positively by lawmakers. Euthanasia should be a natural extension of a patient’s rights allowing him to decide the value of life and death. Continuing life support scheme alongside the patient’s desire is measured as immoral by law as well as medicinal...
Literature Review Some of the theories have been proposed to explain the importance of the moral and ethical standards of human life in the health care system. As indicated by the moral standards of autonomy, the persistent decision is principal in proceeding or withholding his/her treatment and the caretaker who is lawfully answerable for the patient and thinks about his/her desires, may have the moral and lawful right to won’t or demand for pulling back of any treatment or mediations....
01 / 09
Fair Use Policy
EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via firstname.lastname@example.org.
We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.