Modern Segregation in America

The United States has continuously been a diverse but segregated nation. This has developed American politics extremely. Danah Boyd's article, “Why America is Self Segregating”, he briefly explains the unraveling of two historical institutions through social, racial, and class-supported differences of social networks. “Displacing Democracy Economic Segregation in America”, by Amy Widestrom she discusses that less forunate residents are at a disadvantage. She states that “neighborhoods segregated along economic lines create conditions that encourage high levels of political activity, including political and civic mobilization and voting, among wealthier citizens while discouraging and impeding the poor from similar forms of civic engagement.” (Widestrom, 2) John P. Jackson, Jr's book “Social Scientists for Social Justice Making the Case Against Segregation”, Jackson exposes the efforts of social scientists in their struggle to change American legislation and order on race and poverty and confirms that without certain scientists, who produced their expertise to convey on the most important concerns of the time. Throughout history, Americans have had to fight with conflicting views and beliefs, governmental ideas, and experiences to operate as a nation. Many of the organizations that undermine American democracy drive individuals in the United States to confront inequality.

This does not essentially produce understanding or occur in a wholesome analysis. The history of the United States is filled with infinite examples of people dominating and suppressing different individuals based on differences. This is not regarding our past; it is regarding our present. And today’s conflicts over legislation and education are nothing unusual. Ironically, within an environment in which we possess innumerable means to connect, we are also following fragmentation or breaking something big into smaller pieces, polarization, division into two sharply contrasting groups and de-diversification happens in masses. American society is self-segregating, and this is splitting the social framework of the country.

Several individuals within the technology environment believed that the Internet would unite people in miraculous ways, allow for groups to be connected and wounds to mend. Today, these same visionaries perceive it considerably unsettling to follow as the devices that were intended to bring people together are applied by people to exaggerate divisions and threaten human solidarity. These devices were created in a single idea, and that idea has to burst. The predicament is not solely the “filter bubble,” Eli Pariser’s opinion that personalized problem solving methods help put people into separated content streams. However, Facebook uncovers and magnifies trends that have been unraveling in the United States for the last two decades, the idea of self-segregation that is facilitated by technology in multiple complicated ways. Yet, we are going in the opposing direction with severe outcomes.

To understand these outcomes, address two present trend lines and consider the connections going onward. “Displacing Democracy Economic Segregation in America”, by Amy Widestrom,Today in America, Low-income residents are less likely to be politically involved in communities with individuals who produce less income, a trend that is relevant in individual governmental activity. Researching communities in large cities such as, Atlanta, GA, New York City, NY, Kansas City, MO, Saint Louis, MO, and Rochester, NY. Amy Widestrom examines the theory that the 'class gap' which in theory is simply social classes, in federal support is mainly the outcome of individual preferences. 'Displacing Democracy' proves that “communities separated along economic lines produce situations that promote large levels of legislative activity, including legislative and civil mobilization, among more prosperous citizens while controlling and hindering the disadvantaged from comparable forms of civic engagement.” (Widestrom, 3).

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

Place Order

Analyze research, case studies, and meetings, Widestrom shows that community-level sources and characteristics influence political action in unmistakable ways that are not adequately recognized in the current knowledge of American governments and governmental behavior. Also, the roles executed by individual characteristics, increasing financial division in the United States refuse low-income residents the civil and cultural supplies necessary for political militarization and support throughout these communities. Individuals living in poverty ridin communities need the experience, capital or money, and facilities for active civil participation, and this is known by the experience that suburban separation creates an unproductive civil environment incapable of maintaining a vibrant community throughout many decades.

Over time, this produces a balance of legislative authority amoung individuals that is dramatically skewed by individuals with higher incomes but toward whole communities with more financial resources. John P. Jackson, Jr's book “Social Scientists for Social Justice Making the Case Against Segregation”, In one of the twentieth century's monumental Supreme Court cases, Brown v. Board of Education, cultural specialists such as Kenneth Clark helped to influence the Supreme Court Justices of the decrease of the emotional outcomes of racism and discrimination. John P. Jackson, Jr., explores the well-known investigations used in the assistance of Brown, such as Clark’s famous “doll tests,” as well as years of analysis on race which begin the case. In his book Clark states, “Clark gave African American children black and white dolls, identical except for skin color, and asked them to choose the 'nice' doll, the 'bad' doll, and so on.

Clark was 'only one of dozens of expert witnesses' who testified in the four cases that together made up Brown.” (Clark, 4) Kenneth Clark’s important “doll tests” jolted the country in the 1950s when he was apt to illustrate that when provided a choice, Black children favored white dolls to black dolls. Few recognize that these experiments were conducted within the circumstances of the Brown v. Board of Education conferences to display the debilitating psychological impacts of racism and discrimination.

Clark 'stepped over the bounds of proper scientific procedure and into the realm of advocacy,' (Clark, 2) This analysis and others like it had a powerful impact on the Supreme Court justices and were mentioned in the memorable Brown ruling. In many ways, Kenneth Clark and other social experts assisted to reveal the head of Southern segregation.Jackson unveils the efforts of human specialists in their attempt to influence American law and administration on race and hunger and illustrates that without these specialists, who delivered their expertise to carry the most urgent matters of the day, we would not appreciate the legal protections against judgment we may presently take for granted.