The Use of Marijuana: Should Be Legalized or Not?

Despite the prevalence of the use of marijuana in the world, the harmful effects of this substance on the nervous system and its physiological effects can’t be neglected because many of the complications of the use of the substance appear over a long period of time, many societies and individuals may only seek an instant pleasure They are not long-term complications.

Although marijuana is less dependent on cigarettes or opioids, is it only dependent on this important issue? Here, in addition to the dependence of the factors and points to be remarkably expressed. Which involves altering the level of neurotransmitter secretion and reabsorption in the central and peripheral nervous system neurons and other effects on other organs.

The sale and use of marijuana has been legalized in Uruguay, Canada, the Netherlands, and 10 US states, while many researchers have spoken a lot about the devastating effects of this article. What is behind this issue? Marijuana is the most widely used illegal substance in the world, but why is it illegal to be banned when it is consumed so high?

Here, we can have the discussion in the right shape. We can state the opinion of some experts about the use of marijuana and the opposition to the use of marijuana. In Iran, there is no accurate statistics on the use of marijuana, but what is clear is that consumption in our country is rising, perhaps due to poverty, unemployment, high cost, lack of fun or friendship or pleasure. So for these reasons, the person may enter into the use of marijuana

Opinions agree to use

On the years, marijuana has increasingly been prescribed and used for a variety of medical reasons, including pain disorders relief. It was used as a drink at parties or at religious celebrations. Marijuana is far safer than alcohol, which is legal Medical marijuana provides a safe and natural treatment for many types of chronic pain Medical marijuana helps reduce or control symptoms associated with a variety of illnesses, such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, cancer and multiple sclerosis Other prescription drugs on the market – Vicodin, OxyContin and Valium – are far more addictive Marijuana has been used for centuries as a medicinal agent and yielded positive results For every person who supports the legalization of medical marijuana, there is another who strongly opposes it.

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

Place Order

Opinions disagree to use

Cannabis has mental and physical effects in humans, such as creating a high or stoned feeling, a change in perception of memory, make higher mood, and an increase appetite. Onset of effects is after the minutes when smoked, and about 30 to 60 minutes when smoked and drinken. There effect last for between two and six hours or more than. Short-term side effects maybe a decrease in lost of memory, dry of mouth, impairment in motor movement, red iris eyes, and feelings paranoia or anxiety. Long-term side effects may include abuse, decreased mental activity in those who started as under adolescence years, and behavioral problems between children whose mothers used cannabis during the first trimester of pregnancy pregnancy. There is a relation between cannabis user and the risk of sick psychosis, though the cause-and-effect is dispute. Frequent use can impair cognitive ability and working and short term memory. Children would have easier access to a drug that could hurt them Marijuana carries a risk of abuse and addiction its gate of abuse in some area. Could lead to a lower quality of life, as well as health problems and financial issues Is an excuse for drug legalization and recreational use

Results

According to libertarians, adults should have the liberty to pursue their own choices Useful or harmful so long as they do not harm anyone else. Not surprisingly, increased marijuana use after legalization has been accompanied by an increase in the number of emergency cases that department visits and hospitalizations related to acute marijuana intoxication.

Cannabis is a drug of dependence but its dependence risk is less than that of opioids and cocaine and other material There are different opinions about using or not using marijuana The use or rejection of this material depends on the policy of governments, the amount of consumption, the number of regular merchants, the use of other substances, and the dangers of using this substance in the long term and in the short term. The dangers of using marijuana when driving cannot be ignored, visual and auditory illnesses that may be present at home or in the workplace or in the community can be the unwanted risk of release marijuana. Heavy cannabis use contributes to failures of social role in much the same way as alcohol does: increasing the school leaving; depression state; damage mental health, including: psychoses; poor worker performance, increased likelihood of welfare dependence, and unstable and lose of relationships; and poor life satisfaction in live through adulthood. Harms from drug use that affect the user are solely the user’s concern; harms that a user may cause to Several dimensions (such as, car crashes if users drive while intoxicated) or social nuisances (e.g. being kept awake by noise drunks) are matters for criminal and misdeed law, respectively. A rational drug policy for a libertarian would therefore be one that allowed any adult to use the drug if they wished. The restrictions would be limiting this use to those over the age of adult autonomy (18 or 21) and inhibiting use by adults in situations that put others at risk, for example driving a car Or a sensitive job while intoxicated.

Legal moralists and Religious rules, by contrast, believe that (at least some types of) drug use is inherently wrong, for example, because drugs are intoxicating or undermine autonomy, and argue that such wrongful behavior should be criminalized. For legal moralists, a rational drug policy would be one that prohibited the use of the drug and imposed criminal sanctions on those who used it and those who buy and sell this substance should be banned. Any societal costs in enforcing the law are irrelevant from this perspective because legal moralists would argue that laws against drug use or abuse, like laws against murder and theft Betrayal and crime, are morally right, and hence should not be evaluated by considering the costs incurred in enforcing them.

Many people reject both the libertarian and legal moralists’ views. They are at least conditionally prepared to accept that the state may have the right to restrict adult choices if there is good evidence that these choices cause serious harm to individuals and society. Anyone who takes this implicitly utilitarian approach would want to know whether prohibiting drug use prevented these harms, and if so whether this outcome was achieved at an acceptable social and economic cost or not. This approach to policy formulation requires some form of social accounting that examines the costs and benefits of drug use and the enforcement of the prohibition on such use. There are two major problems in undertaking any such accounting: advocates of both liberalization and of a continuation of criminal penalties often have very different views on what these costs and benefits are; and disagree on how these costs and benefits should be weighed against each other.

Given the disadvantages of using and some of the benefits of marijuana, it can be concluded that the use of this substance can have short-term or long-term effects. And maybe some of its disadvantages and advantages are still unclear. Therefore, extensive and unbiased studies should be conducted to find clear results in this regard.