University:
California State University, Northridge
Course:
POLS 155 | American Political Institutions
Academic year:

2024
Views:

442

Pages:

39
Author:

badplekqa0

Chapter 6: The Presidency as an Institution The Presidency and the Founding The framers of the Constitution were ambivalent about executive power. 1. The colonial experience with the king of England and royally appointed governors warned Americans of the dangers of strong executives. 2. The weak executive under the Articles of Confederation highlighted the problems of governing without a potent executive. Led by Alexander Hamilton, Federalists sought to provide for a presidency that was - energetic; - independent of Congress; - endowed with sufficient powers to lead. Although they sought an energetic presidency, their ambivalence toward executive power led the framers of the Constitution to remove the president from direct popular control. - The four-year presidential term was designed to calibrate this leeway and popular control. - The electoral college also stood as an important barrier to popular control of the president. The Constitutional Powers of the Presidency Most of the constitutional provisions concerning the president and executive power are to be found in Article II, which demonstrates the framers’ considerable ambivalence about executive power. Presidential powers combine those expressly stated in the Constitution, delegated powers, and powers inherent to executive leadership. Delegated powers are constitutional powers that are assigned to one governmental agency but are exercised by another agency with the express permission of the first. Inherent powers are powers claimed by a president that are not expressed in the Constitution but are inferred from it. The president’s expressed powers, as defined by Article II, Sections 2 and 3, fall into several categories, including military, diplomatic, judicial, executive, and legislative. Military Powers Article II, Section 2 makes the president “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States.” In addition, the president is the head of intelligence agencies like the CIA, the NSC, the NSA, and the FBI. Diplomatic Powers Article II, Section 3 provides the president the power to “receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers.” In practice, presidents have expanded this diplomatic power to include the ability to recognize certain world governments as legitimate. Increased foreign policy power to make executive agreements and the presidential practice of engaging the U.S. military without formal congressional declarations of war are only two examples of expanding (some argue imperial) presidential powers. In an effort to curb the growth of presidential power, Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in 1973 over President Nixon’s veto. War Powers Act  The War Powers Act requires that the president notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days without an authorization of force or a declaration of war. Despite the War Powers Resolution, presidents have employed military power without Congress’s approval. President George H. W. Bush ordered the Panama invasion in 1989 and President Clinton ordered the bombing in Yugoslavia in 1995, both without congressional authorization. Even when presidents get congressional approval, they nevertheless assert that they do not need such authorization. Judicial Powers Article II, Section 2 provides the president the power to “grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.” a) b) The most important basis of the president’s executive powers is found in Article II, Sections 2 and 3: Section 2 provides the power to appoint executive officers and federal justices and judges. Section 3 stipulates that the president must see that the laws are faithfully executed. Thus, when Congress passes a law, it delegates power to the president to execute that law. Over time, as Congress has created more executive departments and agencies and as the federal government has done more in society, presidential executive authority has grown. Executive orders are In recent years, presidents rules or regulations by increasingly have made policy the president that have through executive orders the effect and formal that often direct executive status of legislation. branch officials and agencies to implement policies in accordance with the president’s policy preferences. 70 V, ct:: I.LI C 60 ct:: 0 I.LI 50 u 40 I.LI X I.LI I- z 30 u LL z 20 u V, 10 ANALYZING THE EVIDENCE During the twentieth century, presidents made increasingly frequent use of executive orders to accomplish their policy goals. What factors explain this development? How have Congress and the courts responded to increased presidential assertiveness? Legislative Powers By giving “to the Congress Information of the State of the Union” and recommending “such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient,” the president plays an important role in shaping the legislative agenda of Congress. With the power of the veto, the president also has an important role in denying congressional action or in bargaining with the legislative branch. If no action is. taken after ten working days while Congress. is in se sion .... I I If mo action is tak n after ten wo king days while· Congr s.s is i' n rece,ss . . Bill dies (pocket veto). llf' bill is aoc:ep.table to the president ... If.a veto is recommended, the b11il goes to . · ove rrid en. Congress fails to override veto. FIGURE 6.1 The Veto Process (bottom) The use of the veto power has changed over time and varies from administration to administration as the president’s relationship to Congress changes. Washington 2 J. Adams 0 Jefferson 0 Madison 7 Monroe J. Q. Adams Jackson 12 Van Buren W. H. Harrison Tyler 10 Polk 3 Taylor 0 Fillmore 0 Pierce Buchanan Lincoln A. Johnson Grant Hayes Garfield Arthur Cleveland (1st) B. Harrison Cleveland (2nd) FIGURE 6.2 Presidential Vetoes (top) 414 McKinley T. Roosevelt Taft Wilson Harding Coolidge Hoover F. D. Roosevelt Truman Eisenhower Kennedy Johnson Nixon Ford Carter Reagan G. H. W. Bush Clinton G. W. Bush FIGURE 6.2 Presidential Vetoes (bottom) 635 Expanding Presidential Power Presidential power expanded greatly from the 19th to the 20th century as the institutional power of the presidency grew and as presidents strengthened their connections to the people. In the 20th century, changing conceptions of the importance of the president led to an increase in presidential power: - The president plays a more direct role in setting the domestic policy agenda - The immediacy of modern war making and America’s role in the world expanded presidential strength. The Organizational Presidency Contemporary presidents sit atop complex and growing White House organizations as well as an ever-expanding executive branch. FIGURE 6.3 The Institutional Presidency, 2007 (top) FIGURE 6.3 The Institutional Presidency, 2007 (bottom) Expanding White House Staff – The White House staff increased from fewer than 50 members in the 1930s to over 500 in contemporary White Houses. – Organizational elaboration within the White House increased specialization and expertise in the presidency. Expanding Executive Branch – Growing executive administration empowers the president as the “chief executive.” – Presidents use appointment powers, executive reorganization, and executive orders to affect policy through executive action. Political Resources of Presidential Power The framers’ ambivalence toward executive power has created a “gray area” in which the strength of the presidency is primarily determined by the individual skills of presidents and the support of the public. In the 20th century, presidents expanded their connections to the people due to: - the advent of popular presidential campaigning - the use of conventions and then primary elections All contemporary presidents seek to leverage their political resources and connections to the people to enhance their influence. Even though the president is not directly elected by the people, the advent of popular campaigning, particularly through the mass media, has given presidents the ability to claim electoral mandates for their policy agendas. As important political leaders, presidents use their connections to important interest groups and social movements like organized labor, the Christian Right, or the NRA to support their programs and initiatives. Political parties and interest groups are also important sources of political influence for the president. For example, just as the president’s use of the veto varies from administration to administration, presidential support in Congress often depends on the number of his fellow partisans in the House and Senate. 100 - Period of divided government 95 - 90 I.LI u ANALYZING THE EVIDENCE Presidential success ebbs and flows, especially with the partisan character of Congress. Compare suc• cess rates when the presi dent and the legislature were of the same party (for example, Clinton's first two years) and when they were not (for example, Clinton's last six years). < 85 z I.LI u 0:: I.LI a. VI I.LI I- 80 75 70 0 65 > ::::> 60 I.LI 55 ...J u. VI VI u 50 u ::::> VI 45 40 35 1956 1960 1964 1968 7972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 ..____� L_ I I o-\ -::-'l, {.f o" <-, -::- ,2; ' II o" �� I I _J L___J �--� L___J �-� �-- «o�◊ ci.x.e,' q:- 'b-" e,'b-°<> � �v �- '<'. (y PRESIDENCY FIGURE 6.4 The Presidential Batting Average: Presidential Success on Congressional Votes Although it is true that all presidents have attempted to persuade and otherwise lead the public, there has been a steady trend toward greater popular presidential leadership since the 1960s. Still, if popular support is key to contemporary presidential influence, it puts presidential leadership in a precarious position since popular support for almost all presidents declines over time. ANALYZING THE EVIDENCE In the presidential performance-rating poll, re spondents are asked, "Do you approve of the way the president is handling his job?" The graphs show the percentage of positive re sponses. Observe that pres idents generally experience broad shifts in popular ap proval. What factors help explain changes in presi dential approval ratings? Does popular approval re ally affect presidential power? How can popular feelings about the president affect the president's con duct and influence? l..7 2 > 0 0:: Q. Q. < w � 1- z w u 0:: w Q. l..7 w z � - I- > z Ow 0:: Q. Q. < u 0:: w Q. uw 80 70 60 50 40 Nixon L. B. Johnson Kennedy 30 20 ,....___.___,___.__...__.___..,__.___.___.__...__..__...____._, 1961 196219631964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 YEAR 80 70 60 50 40 Reagan 30 20 ......._.___.____.__.....__..__,...___.___.___.____.___.__...__..__._____, 1975 19761977 1978 19791980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 YEAR 80 Z � - I> z � � 70 60 50 Q. Q. 40 < 0:: w Q. G. H. W. Bush Clinton G. W. Bush 30 20 ,....___.___,__.....__...___,_____.___,___.__...__.___..,__.___.__......__...____.___.____, 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 19961997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 YEAR FIGURE 6.6 Presidential Performance Ratings

Chapter 6: The Presidency as an Institution

Related Documents

Recommended Documents

Description

Related Documents

Free up your schedule!

Take 5 seconds to unlock