"FIDES" is often (and wrongly) translated 'faith', but it has nothing to do with
the word as used by Christians writing in Latin about the Christian virute (St.
Paul Letter to the Corinthians, chapter 13). For the Romans, FIDES was an
essential element in the character of a man of public affairs, and a necessary
constituent element of all social and political transactions (perhaps = 'good
faith'). FIDES meant 'reliablilty', a sense of trust between two parties if a
relationship between them was to exist. FIDES was always reciprocal and
mutual, and implied both privileges and responsibilities on both sides. In both
public and private life the violation of FIDES was considered a serious matter,
with both legal and religious consequences. FIDES, in fact, was one of the
first of the 'virtues' to be considered an actual divinity at Rome. The Romans
had a saying, "Punica fides" (the reliability of a Carthaginian) which for them
represented the highest degree of treachery: the word of a Carthaginian (like
Hannibal) was not to be trusted, nor could a Carthaginian be relied on to
maintain his political elationships.
VIRTUS
VIRTUS, for the Roman, does not carry the same overtones as the Christian
'virtue'. But like the Greek andreia, VIRTUS has a primary meaning of 'acting
like a man' (vir) [cf. the Renaissance virtù ), and for the Romans this meant
first and foremost 'acting like a brave man in military matters'. virtus was to be
found in the context of 'outstanding deeds' (egregia facinora), and brave
deeds were the accomplishments which brought GLORIA ('a reputation'). This
GLORIA was attached to two ideas: FAMA ('what people think of you') and
dignitas ('one's standing in the community'). The struggle for VIRTUS at Rome
was above all a struggle for public office (honos), since it was through high
office, to which one was elected by the People, that a man could best show hi
smanliness which led to military achievement--which would lead in turn to a
reputation and votes. It was the duty of every aristocrat (and would-be
aristocrat) to maintain the dignitas which his family had already achieved and
to extend it to the greatest possible degree (through higher political office and military victories). This system resulted in a strong built-in impetus in Roman
society to engage in military expansion and conquest at all times.