Week 2 Notes: Strain

Week 2 notes: Strain Fall 2005 1 Reading assignment Twiss and Moores: chapter 15, in particular, pages 292  302. Discussion of specic special types of strain (pure shear, simple shear) begin on page 303. Pages 304  310 deal with progressive strain, and are useful background material for the lab. W. Means (1976) Stress and Strain is a great text, very clear, well written and reads easily. J. Ramsay and M. Huber (1983) The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology, Volume 1: Strain Analysis is amazingly detailed, with many, many examples of detailed strain analysis. It can, however, be "a bit much". 2 Strain I: displacement, strain and terminology Given enough stress, a material responds by deforming. We distinguish: between rigid body deformations and non-rigid body deformations. The rst includes translation and rotations of a body. The second includes distortion and dilation. Other important distinctions are: continuous vs. discontinuous strain and homogenous vs. heterogeneous strain. Whether strain is homogenous or heterogenous is often a function of the scale of observation. Also, when strain in natural systems is analyzed, a common approach is to identify structural domains wherein the strain is continuous and sometimes homogenous. The point of doing so is that we can bring the tools of continuum mechanics  the physics of continuous deformation. 2.1 Measurement of strain 1. Changes in the lengths of lines 2. Changes in angles 3. Changes in areas or volumes Changes in line length: 3 important measures: Elongation e≡ lf − li lf Δl = = −1 li li li 1 Stretch S≡ lf =1+e li Quadratic elongation λ ≡ S 2 = (1 + e)2 So λ = 1 means no change in length; λ < 1 reects shortening and λ > 1 is extension. Changes in angles 1. Consider 2 originally perpendicular lines. The change in angle between those lines is 90 − α = ψ ≡ angular shear 2. Consider a particle on the y-axis. Measure displacement at some distance y from the origin, in the x direction: x = γ ≡ shear strain y Note that: γ = tan ψ Change in volume (or area) The dilation is similar to the denition of elongation: Δ≡ Vf − Vi ΔV = Vi Vi Note that all these measurements take the undeformed state as the point of reference. It is equally feasible to take the length or angles in the deformed state as the reference state. There are no particularly good reasons for doing one or the other, neither is good for large strains. Alternatively, the innitesimal strain is often a very useful concept, corresponding to the strain accrued in a vanishingly small instant of deformation. 3 The strain ellipsoid In a deforming body, material lines will rotate and change shape. We want to be able to characterize the rotation and elongation of any arbitrary line. A circle (sphere in 3D) allows us to keep track of all possible orientations of lines. As it turns out, any homogenous strain turns a circle into an ellipse and a sphere into an ellipsoid. 2 Consider a circle of unit radius, deformed into an ellipse oriented such that the major and minor semi-axes are parallel with the coordinate axes. The elongation, stretch and quadratic elongation of the major semi-axis are given by: lf x − 1 1 Sx = 1 + ex = lf x ex = λx = lf2x √ √ Alternatively, lf x = λx . Similarly, lf z = λz . Since the equa2 2 tion of an ellipse is just xa2 + zb2 = 1, where a and b are the lengths of the semi-axes, the equation of the strain ellipse is just x2 z2 + =1 λx λz In three dimensions: x2 y2 z2 + + =1 λx λz λz More generally, the semi-axes of the strain ellipse (ellipsoid in 3D) are the principal strains, analogous to the principal stresses we saw earlier. The length of the semi-axes (S1 , S2 , S3 ) are the magnitudes of the principal strains. One of the features of the principal strains is that, not only are they orthogonal in the deformed state, but the same lines will be orthogonal in the undeformed state. The strain ellipsoid can have various shapes, corresponding to uniaxial, biaxial or triaxial strain. Circular sections through biaxial strain ellipses will be undistorted; in triaxial strain they will be distorted, though equally shortened or lengthened in all directions. If you're lucky, the rock body you are looking at will contain initially circular or spherical markers. Deformation will turn these into ellipses, whose long and short axes are the principal strain axes. Examples of reasonably nice spherical strain markers are ooids or (perhaps) pebbles in a conglomerate. The spherical cross sections of worm tubes can also be used in this way. Initially elliptical or ellipsoidal markers can also be used to characterize strain, though this is more complicated. 4 Displacement vector elds and strain One approach to analyzing strain is to keep track of particle displacements. The position (x, y ) of a particle before deformation to its position (x � , y � ) can be related by a set of coordinate trans- 3 formation equations of the form: x � = ax + by y � = cx + dy If a, b, c, d are constants, then the strain is homogenous. Two particularly important strain regimes are simple shear and pure shear and their coordinate transformation equations, expressed in matrix notation are: � � � � 1 γ k 0 0 1 0 1/k Deformation is usually not instantaneous: strains accumulate over time. One kind of strain can follow one another. Mathematically, this is equivalent to multiplying the strain matrices. Note that matrix multiplication is not commutative, so, for example, simple shear followed by pure shear does not yield the same nal result as pure shear followed by simple shear. If the orientations of the principal strain axes do not rotate during deformation, then the strain is said to be irrotational. 5 Mohr circles for strain I : Innitesimal strain The innitesimal strain is a useful concept that can be thought of as representing the instantaneous material response to stress. The accumulation of innitesimal strain increments over geological time results in the deformation that the geologist observes and tries to understand in the outcrop  known as the nite strain. For our purposes we can consider "pretty small" strains  say, less than 1%  to be innitesimal. For the purposes of deriving the Mohr circle equations, this case also allows the use of small angle approximations, in particular, γ = ψ . As with stress, we want a Mohr circle construction that allows us to read o (1) the elongation (for innitesimal strain, call it �) and (2) the shear strain (γ that aect any line of any given orientation. The principal strains are denoted �1 , �2 , �3 . A fairly tedious derivation (for details, you might check out Hobbes (1976)) yields: � � � � �1 + �2 �1 − �2 �= + cos 2α 2 2 � � �1 − �2 γ = sin 2α 2 2 Note that this Mohr circle is drawn in � vs. γ/2 coordinates. Examination of the Mohr circle for innitesimal strain yields the following important relations: 1. There are two lines that experience the maximum shear strain, and they are located at 45◦ to the principal strain axes. 2. The maximum shear strain is given by γ/2 ± (�1 − �2 )/2, i.e. γ ± (�1 − �2 ). 3. Any 2 lines perpendicular to one another are 180◦ apart on the Mohr circle, so they suer shear strains equal in magnitude but opposite in sign. 4 6 Mohr circles II: Finite strain As the result of nite strain, lines are lengthened or shortened and the angles between intersecting lines are usually changed. Considering a unit circle deformed into an ellipse whose axes are parallel with the coordinate frame, we can derive relationships that track the elongations and rotations (shear strains) for any line. As you might expect, a Mohr circle construction is the ticket to the big time. The derivations of these are so tedious that even Ramsay and Huber relegate them to an appendix (cf. Ramsay and Huber, appendix D if you can't help yourself... I myself have wasted a greater part of my mortal existence on these than I would really care to admit ....). Two separate constructions are available: one identies lines according to the angles they make with the principal strain directions in the "unstrained state"  this is of somewhat limited use since we rarely know what the orientations of lines used to be. The other deals with the orientations in the strained state. 6.1 Unstrained state reference frame The unstrained reference frame refers back to the pre-deformation orientation of a line P . The line makes an angle θ with the principal strain axes. Upon deformation, it suers an elongation and rotates into a new position P � (in general, we will use primes to distinguish the reference frames) making an angle θ� with the principal strain directions. The elongation and shear strain of an arbitrary line are given by λ= (λ1 + λ2 ) (λ1 − λ2 ) + cos 2θ 2 2 λ1 − λ2 γ= √ sin 2θ 2 λ1 λ2 Note: these√fail to produce a circle (instead, you get a Mohr ) unless λ1 λ2 = 1, i.e. there is no dilation. ellipse 6.2 Strained reference frame Usually, we are confronted with good rocks gone bad, and so the angles we measure are those of lines in the strained state, i.e. we measure θ� , not θ. Conversion between the two reference frames can be done using: sin θ = λ1/2 sin θ� /λ1/2 2 1/2 cos θ = λ1/2 cos θ� /λ1 and pulling a little denitional slight of hand: 1. Dene a new strain parameter γ � = γ/λ. 2. Use the reciprocal quadratic extensions γ1� = 1/γ1 and γ2� = 1/γ2 . The Mohr equations become: λ� = λ�1 + λ�2 λ� − λ�2 − 1 cos 2θ� 2 2 λ� − λ�1 sin 2θ� γ� = 2 2 5