Ionospheric Delay - Propagation

Propagation: Ionospheric delay • Summary – Quick review/introduction to propagating waves – Effects of low density plasma – Additional effects – Treatment of ionospheric delay in GPS processing – Examples of some results 2 Microwave signal propagation • Maxwell’s Equations describe the propagation of electromagnetic waves (e.g. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Wiley, pp. 848, 1975) 4π 1 ∂D ∇ • D = 4 πρ ∇ × H = J+ c ∂t c 1 ∂B ∇ •B = 0 ∇×E+ =0 c ∂t 3 Maxwell’s equations • In Maxwell’s equations: – E = Electric field; ρ=charge density; J=current density – D = Electric displacement D=E+4πP where P is electric polarization from dipole moments of molecules. – Assuming induced polarization is parallel to E then we obtain D=εE, where ε is the dielectric constant of the medium – B=magnetic flux density (magnetic induction) – H=magnetic field;B=µH; µ is the magnetic permeability 4 Maxwell’s equations • General solution to equations is difficult because a propagating field induces currents in conducting materials which effect the propagating field. • Simplest solutions are for non-conducting media with constant permeability and susceptibility and absence of sources. 5 Maxwell’s equations in infinite medium • With the before mentioned assumptions Maxwell’s equations become: 1 ∂B ∇ •E = 0 ∇ ×E + =0 c ∂t µε ∂E =0 ∇ •B = 0 ∇ × B − c ∂t • Each cartesian component of E and B satisfy the wave equation 6 Wave equation • Denoting one component by u we have: 1 ∂ 2u ∇ u− 2 2 =0 v ∂t v= 2 c µε • The solution to the wave equation is: u=e ik.x−iωt E = E 0e ik.x−iωt k= ω v = µε ω c k×E B = µε k wave vector 7 Simplified propagation in ionosphere • For low density plasma, we have free electrons that do not interact with each other. • The equation of motion of one electron in the presence of a harmonic electric field is given by: m[x Ý Ý+ γxÝ+ ω 02 x ] = −eE(x,t) • Where m and e are mass and charge of electron and γ is a damping force. Magnetic forces are neglected. 8 Simplified model of ionosphere • The dipole moment contributed by one electron is p=-ex • If the electrons can be considered free (ω0=0) then the dielectric constant becomes (with f0 as fraction of free electrons): 4 πNf 0e 2 ε(ω ) = ε0 + i mω (γ 0 − iω ) 9 High frequency limit (GPS case) • When the EM wave has a high frequency, the dielectric constant can be written as for NZ electrons per unit volume: ω 2p e(ω ) = 1 − 2 ω 4 πNZe 2 ω = ⇒ plasma frequency m 2 p • For the ionosphere, NZ=104-106 electrons/cm3 and ωp is 6-60 of MHz • The wave-number is k = ω 2 − ω 2p /c 10 Effects of magnetic field • The original equations of motion of the electron neglected the magnetic field. We can include it by modifying the F=Ma equation to: e mÝ xÝ− B 0 × xÝ= −eEe−iωt for B 0 transverse to propagation c e E for E = (e1 ± ie 2 )E x= mω (ω mω B ) e B0 ωB = mc precession frequency 11 Effects of magnetic field • For relatively high frequencies; the previous equations are valid for the component of the magnetic field parallel to the magnetic field • Notice that left and right circular polarizations propagate differently: birefringent • Basis for Faraday rotation of plane polarized waves 12 Refractive indices • Results so far have shown behavior of single frequency waves. • For wave packet (ie., multiple frequencies), different frequencies will propagate a different velocities: Dispersive medium • If the dispersion is small, then the packet maintains its shape by propagates with a velocity given by dω/dk as opposed to individual frequencies that propagate with velocity ω/k 13 Group and Phase velocity • The phase and group velocities are v p = c / µε v g = 1 ω d µε(ω ) ) + µε(ω ) /c ( c dω • If ε is not dependent on ω, then vp=vg • For the ionosphere, we have ε<1 and therefore vp>c. Approximately vp=c-∆v and vg=c+∆v and ∆v depends of ω2 14 Dual Frequency Ionospheric correction • The frequency squared dependence of the phase and group velocities is the basis of the dual frequency ionospheric delay correction R1 = Rc + I1 R2 = Rc + I1 ( f1 / f 2 ) 2 φ1λ1 = Rc − I1 φ 2 λ2 = Rc − I1 ( f1 / f 2 ) 2 • Rc is the ionospheric-corrected range and I1 is ionospheric delay at the L1 frequency 15 Linear combinations • From the previous equations, we have for range, two observations (R1 and R2) and two unknowns Rc and I1 I1 = (R1 − R2 ) /(1 − ( f1 / f 2 ) 2 ) ( f1 / f 2 ) 2 R1 − R2 Rc = ( f1 / f 2 ) 2 − 1 ( f1 / f 2 ) 2 ≈ 1.647 • Notice that the closer the frequencies, the larger the factor is in the denominator of the Rc equation. For GPS frequencies, Rc=2.546R1-1.546R2 16 Approximations • If you derive the dual-frequency expressions there are lots of approximations that could effect results for different (lower) frequencies – Series expansions of square root of ε (f4 dependence) – Neglect of magnetic field (f3). Largest error for GPS could reach several centimeters in extreme cases. – Effects of difference paths traveled by f1 and f2. Depends on structure of plasma, probably f4 dependence. 17 Magnitudes • The factors 2.546 and 1.546 which multiple the L1 and L2 range measurements, mean that the noise in the ionospheric free linear combination is large than for L1 and L2 separately. • If the range noise at L1 and L2 is the same, then the Rc range noise is 3-times larger. • For GPS receivers separated by small distances, the differential position estimates may be worse when dual frequency processing is done. • As a rough rule of thumb; the ionospheric delay is 110 parts per million (ie. 1-10 mm over 1 km) 18 Variations in ionosphere • 11-year Solar cycle 400 350 Sun Spot Number Smoothed + 11yrs Approximate 11 year cycle Sun Spot Number 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 Year 2000 2005 2010 19 Example of JPL in California 1.0 Ionospheric Phase delay (m) 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0 -2.5 -3.0 -8 -6 -4 -2 PST (hrs) 0 2 4 6 20 PRN03 seen across Southern California 0.6 Ionospheric Phase delay (m) 0.4 0.2 0 -0.2 CAT1 CHIL HOLC JPLM -0.4 LBCH PVER USC1 -0.6 -2 -1 0 1 PST (hrs) 2 3 4 21 Effects on position (New York) 500 Kinematic 100 km baseline (mm) 250 0 -250 L1 North L2 North LC North RMS 50 mm L1; 81 mm L2; 10 mm LC (>5 satellites) -500 0.0 500 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.5 (mm) 250 0 -250 L1 East L2 East LC East RMS 42 mm L1; 68 mm L2; 10 mm LC (>5 satellites) -500 0.0 0.5 1.0 Time (hrs) 1.5 22 Equatorial Electrojet (South America) o Site at -18 Latitude (South America) Ionospheric L1 delay (m) 0 -2 North Looking -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 South Looking 0 1 2 3 4 Hours 5 6 7 8 23 Summary • Effects of ionospheric delay are large on GPS (10’s of meters in point positioning); 1-10ppm for differential positioning • Largely eliminated with a dual frequency correction at the expense of additional noise (and multipath) • Residual errors due to neglected terms are small but can reach a few centimeters when ionospheric delay is large. 24