University:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Course:
2.141 | Modeling and Simulation of Dynamic Systems
Academic year:

2020
Views:

134

Pages:

13
Author:

Juliet Carey

EXAMPLE: ELECTROMAGNETIC SOLENOID A common electromechanical actuator for linear (translational) motion is a solenoid. Current in the coil sets up a magnetic field that tends to center the movable armature. On the electrical side the device behaves like an inductor —but the inductance depends on the position of the movable armature. This “position-modulated inductor” is properly represented by a two-port energy-storage element with an electrical port and a mechanical port. On the mechanical side, a force is required to displace the armature from its center position —the device looks like a spring. An inductor may be represented by a gyrator (coupling the electrical and magnetic domains) and a capacitor representing magnetic energy storage. A bond graph for this model is as follows. e le c t r ic a l m a g n e tic m e ch an ica l d o m ain d o m a in d o m a in . e=λ F F . GY C x. i ϕ N EQUIVALENT BEHAVIOR: To find an equivalent model without the magnetic domain bring the magnetic behavior into the electrical domain. a capacitor through a gyrator behaves like an inductor the mechanical side still behaves like a spring. This model can be represented by a (new) multiport element with “mixed” behavior —like an inertia (inductor) on one port —like a capacitor (spring) on the other e le c t r ic a l m e c h a n ic a l d o m ain d o m ain . F e=λ IC x. i This element is often simply called a “multiport IC”. CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS —two needed i = i(λ, x) F = F(λ, x) Electrical constitutive equation—assume electrical linearity λ i = L(x) where L(x) is a position-dependent inductance. Mechanical constitutive equation—find the total stored energy. λ2 E = 2 L(x) Force is the gradient of energy with respect to displacement. ∂E λ 2 ∂L(x ) ∂x F= =− ∂x 2 L(x )2 We need to know the function L(x) relating inductance to armature position. With the armature centered, idealized coil inductance (neglecting fringing effects) is L = N2µrµoA/l where N is number of turns, µr is relative permeability, µo is the permeability of air or vacuum, A is coil cross sectional area and l is coil length. With the armature removed—displaced an infinite distance—idealized coil inductance is L∞ = N2µoA/l In practice µr >> µo so L >> L∞ We expect the inductance to be large with the armature centered and to decline smoothly to a small value as the armature is withdrawn to either side. The precise form of L(x) may be determined in several ways —by experiment —using Finite-Element codes to compute the magnetic field for different armature positions. An approximation: For pedagogic simplicity we will use the following function. L(x) = L e–(x/xc)2 where xc is a characteristic length of the armature and it has been assumed that L∞ ≈ 0 CAUTION! This is not accurate! It has no better justification than that —it is analytically simple —it has approximately the right shape. Mechanical constitutive equation: 2 ∂L(x ) 2x = − 2 Le −( x x c ) ∂x xc λ 2 2x Le − ( x x c ) F= 2 x c2 Le −( x x c )2 2 ( ) 2 λ 2 xe( x x c ) F= Lx c2 2 This equation implies that force grows without bound as armature displacement increases. DOES THIS MAKE SENSE PHYSICALLY? Shouldn’t the force should decline as the armature is removed? CHECK FOR ERRORS: Multiport stores energy, therefore should obey Maxwell’s reciprocity. Partial derivatives: ∂i 2λxe( x x c ) = ∂x Lx c2 2 ∂F 2λxe( x x c ) = ∂λ Lx c2 2 —identical, as required. The answer to this puzzle lies in our implicit assumptions —that displacement and flux linkage are independent input variables. If the flux density could be held constant, the force would grow with separation —but this is unlikely. It requires current to grow without bound as armature displacement increases. For example: include the inevitable resistance of the coil assume a constant voltage input Se ein 1 e c o il i IC F x. R at steady state for fixed x, the current is constant, not voltage. λ̇ steady-state = ecoil,steady-state = ein – icoil,steady-state R = 0 ein icoil,steady-state = R To express force as a function of current, F = F(i, x) we may use the electrical constitutive equation to eliminate flux linkage. i 2 Lxe− ( x x c ) F= x c2 2 In this case, if x < xc —force increases as x is increased if x > xc —force declines rapidly to zero consistent with common experience. NOTES: Behavior (e.g., force-displacement relation) depends on boundary conditions. Force as a function of current and displacement corresponds to differential causality on the inertia side of the multiport. e c o il i IC F x.

Electromagnetic Solenoid

Related Documents

Recommended Documents

Description

Related Documents

Free up your schedule!

Take 5 seconds to unlock