When it is Okay to Break the Law

-When it is okay to break the law? First of all we must always now what does precisely the law is, so basically law commonly refers to a system of rules created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to control behavior, with its precise definition a matter of longstanding debate. it's been variously described as a science and also the art of justice. And it's important to respect the country law’s because the aim of it's to possess a secure country and also protecting liberties and rights. However, as a standard those who doesn't have a background about the country legislation if someone asked us this question logically the solution are going to be no. But if we considered it deeply we are going to notice that there's some situation you are doing not have the other choice and you may be ending up breaking the law without realizing for example; after you are taking a member of your family to the hospital and he or she has an emergency situation that don't handle any delay, so doltishly you'll be driving fast and spending the red signal to avoid wasting his or her life but at the identical time it's considered as breaking the law. Other modern example is uploading the VPN on your phone to possess the access to some specific sites while it's legally prohibited. Furthermore, we are able to also discuss Crito and Antigone stories because each of the have the alternative answer of the most question. Starting with Crito story The Greek philosopher Socrates has been sentenced to death on trumped-up charges (not recognising the gods recognised by the State, inventing new gods, corrupting the youth of Athens), and when Crito (his old friend) came to go to him he offered to him that he can easily free him but Socrates refused his offer and told him that he's prepared to die. Crito had many reasons to convince Socrates but he didn't consider any of them and argues that the laws of Athens are collective and to interrupt one is to interrupt all of them. which is unjust. this is often one in all the explanations of why he refused Crito offer, and from this story it's clearly shows that Socrates think that he cannot break the law whether or not the law itself was unjust. Antigone story shows the alternative opinion, Antigone has been caught within the act of performing funereal rites for her brother how has been killed by her other brother. Creon is furious, and has Antigone brought before him. She remains defiant and says that she is going to not break the laws of the gods just to follow Creon's unjust law. Creon responds that she is going to die for her disobedience to the laws of town. Ismene pleads with Creon to spare her sister's life. Antigone is engaged to Creon's son, Haemon, and also the two of them are pretty much infatuated. But Creon is as unyielding in his allegiance to the rule of law as Antigone is to the unwritten traditional rules of the gods. So he decided to kill her but sadly she committed suicide, and when Haemon saw her died body he couldn’t handle it and he killed his self too ahead of his father. Antigone was the heroine of the story, she did what she think it's right and he or she whether or not it's consider as breaking the law. In conclusion, because it shows from the above examples breaking the law depend upon matters. Sometimes the law itself will be unjust but not everyone has the courage to try and do something about it like what happened in Crito story, but there are some have the courage to try and do something about true which what was showed in Antigone story and the way brave she was. However, in my opinion i believe it isn’t okay to interrupt the law in any time because the most purpose of the laws is to establishing standards, maintaining order, resolving disputes, and protecting liberties and rights which can result in a developed and safe country!