University:
University of Houston
Course:
MATH 1313 | Linear Algebra
Academic year:

2022
Views:

128

Pages:

12
Author:

Sabbelig2u

High correlations between interaction terms .06 .04 0 .02 -.02 -.04 0 1 2 3 Civic Duty 4 5 Figure 1. Average Marginal Effects of Party Differential on Voter Turnout with 95 % Confidence Intervals 6 .04 .03 .02 0 .01 -.01 0 1 2 3 Civic Duty 4 5 Figure 2. Average Marginal Effects of Affinity for Candidate on Voter Turnout with 95 % Confidence Intervals 6 Another Empirical Test  Data: Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study: The Survey of the Presidential and Legislative Elections (TEDS2012)  Dependent variable: Turnout in the 2012 presidential election.  Key independent variables: party differential, civic duty, and affinity for candidate.  Control variables: political efficacy, political interest, electoral concern, strength of party ID, and demographics (i.e., income, education, gender and age). 0 .01 -.01 -.02 -.03 -.04 0 1 2 Civic Duty Figure 3. Average Marginal Effects of Party Differential on Voter Turnout with 95 % Confidence Intervals in Taiwan 3 .06 .04 0 .02 -.02 0 1 2 Civic Duty Figure 4. Average Marginal Effects of Affinity for Candidate on Voter Turnout with 95 % Confidence Intervals in Taiwan 3