English Assignment (In War There Are No Winners)

STRATEGIES AND THEIR APPLICABILITY: ➢ BRAINSTORMING 1. Mass Destruction 2. Use of weapons 3. Economic Loss 4. Misery 5. Armed Conflict 6. Physical Disability 7. Danger 8. Violence and brutality 9. Human rights Violation 10. Malnutrition ➢ QUESTIONING 1. Who are affected by war? Who 2. Who are responsible for creating Conflict? 1. What comes to your mind when you hear the word “war”? What 2. What would you do when war break out in your country? 1. Where are the Flag bearers of Peace when war happens? Where 2. Where the world is heading by having mere thought of war? 1. When Countries are going to solve their conflict through Peace? When 2. When the world is not going to face wars anymore? 1. Why some countries are eager to wage war, while others are not ? Why 2. Why countries indulge in warfare? 1. How the war can be stopped? How 2. How a country can be winner after war when losing its people? ➢ LISTING List 1 List 2 loss of resources Natural resources like land,water,air,trees etc are affected badly by war Ideological conflict Israel Palestine conflict Nuclear war Collapse of civilization Territorial dispute Different States claiming the same land Civil War Kills citizens within one’s own country MILLIONS DEATHS FREE WRITING Nobody need any further clarification to the meaning of war everyone know what war is It is a physical conflict between two or more countries when a war sweep through a continent or country nothing left intact in its wake it bring about widespread famine misery destruction and death. millions of life of the citizen of the opposing countries how can the winners and losers be defined That is quite impossible In a war there are no winner only losers. Losers who could not resolve their conflict and difference by peaceful means losers who lost millions of lifes and resource loser who is losers always losers resort to war because it could not resolve conflicts peacefully winners do not go to arms they solve conflicts diplomatically In any war There will be two opposing side or maybe more But what remain as solid as stone is the fact that life from all sides are lost in the battle taken by the grim reaper who turns a blind eye to any allegiance one may have, regardless of victory or defeat in the end it is humanity as a whole which loses If the winners of wars are not the winner then do it make the losers the winner,. I do not think so They had lost too they have lost their civilians their armies their territories their resources and their pride. the winner also suffer the same fate as the losers in a war both have a large number of casualties and also suffer the same negative repercussions of war such as social upheaval and economic disruptions. Did Michelangelo take a paintbrush to the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel and just go crazy with artistic expression. benefits from a war. Everyone loses. In any war there will be casualties and penalties for both sides, the winners and losers , even if you is the winner it is only superficial The casualty are still there that is a hard fact which no one can ignore What I’ve discovered after several novels and years of writing is that the time you invest in your pre-writing stage will determine how smoothly the writing process goes Only when the day comes at the end of the war when only one side suffer casualties and the negative effected of wars THen we can trully identify between the winner and the the loser WHhen countries win a war it just show that they is good at fighting than their opponents Since both sides had devastated each other In order to support my topic i will explain it with the help of historical example of warssuch as world war 1 world war 2 japan attack pakistan india conflict on kashmir issuee all would very familiar to these brutal occassion which are held in our histories, they bring about widespread famine misery destruction and death The horrors of these brutal wars can clearly be understood from an essay Nagasakiaugust 9 1945 by mIichaito IChimaru in which he has narrated the personal tragic scene of nagasaki after it was hit by an atomic bomb He had a plan. Likewise, you need to sketch out your story before you start adding words This dreadful description of a war stricken city is evident proof of the calamityi and grave tragedies suffered by innocent victims of war. It were enough to prove that war is only a disastrous entity which makes everyone a loser in the end because both enemy engaging in war undergo a great deal of devastation and destruction But after trying different methods, I do believe that pre-writing is beneficial. You need to spend time developing your characters, world, plot, and doing lots (and lots) of research If we take an example of kashmir issue between pakistan and India we will mention the thrii historical wars occurred in 1947 1965 1971 between two countries Both of countries lost their millions of people loved ones neighbours resources BUut could not resolve the kashmir issue. “But I’m an artist! I can’t be constrained by notes and outlines!” It will make keeping your story info organized a breeze. Then how one country can say that it is the winner of that war but only loser because that country which was involved in war lost its countries people resources If one country involves in a war,it loses all its hegemony in all over the world. I conclude my topic by saying that not only fatal wars between countries or NNations result in loss of every innocent life and destruction of every single commodity but the same tragedy occurs in all kinds of wars, conflict.The conflict between different races families people to people also causes immense psychological and mental pain to all members involved. These trivial fights not only destroy the peace of a society or country but can also cause extreme mental torture As a result these apparently trivial arguments lead ultimately to both the moral and mental loss for each member that involveD in any conflict It therefore proves the fact that all kinds of war, be they fatal or trivial, have one aspect in common… all loserRR and NOo victors. All wars are follies very expensive and very mischievous ones In my opinion, there never was a good war or a bad peace. When will mankind be convinced and agree to settle their difficulties by arbitration/ I know when you have an idea for a story you can get impatient with excitement, but don’t put the cart before the horse, so to speak. Be patient and invest your time in planning, and you will be rewarded. At the end NOow I can easily say that in war there are no winners but loSeR Alas, EDITING Nobody need any further clarification to the meaning of war everyone know what war is It is a physical conflict between two or more countries when a war sweep through a continent or country nothing left intact in its wake it bring about widespread famine misery destruction and death. millions of life of the citizen of the opposing countries how can the winners and losers be defined That is quite impossible In a war there are no winner only losers. Losers who could not resolve their conflict and difference by peaceful means losers who lost millions of lifes and resource loser who is losers always losers resort to war because it could not resolve conflicts peacefully winners do not go to arms they solve conflicts diplomatically In any war There will be two opposing side or maybe more But what remain as solid as stone is the fact that life from all sides are lost in the battle taken by the grim reaper who turns a blind eye to any allegiance one may have, regardless of victory or defeat in the end it is humanity as a whole which loses If the winners of wars are not the winner then do it make the losers the winner,. I do not think so They had lost too they have lost their civilians their armies their territories their resources and their pride. the winner also suffer the same fate as the losers in a war both have a large number of casualties and also suffer the same negative repercussions of war such as social upheaval and economic disruptions. Nobody benefits from a war. Everyone loses. In any war there will be casualties and penalties for both sides, the winners and losers , even if you is the winner it is only superficial The casualty are still there that is a hard fact which no one can ignore Only when the day comes at the end of the war when only one side suffer casualties and the negative effected of wars THen we can trully identify between the winner and the the loser WHhen countries win a war it just show that they is good at fighting than their opponents Since both sides had devastated each other In order to support my topic i will explain it with the help of historical example of warssuch as world war 1 world war 2 japan attack pakistan india conflict on kashmir issuee all would very familiar to these brutal occassion which are held in our histories, they bring about widespread famine misery destruction and death The horrors of these brutal wars can clearly be understood from an essay Nagasakiaugust 9 1945 by mIichaito IChimaru in which he has narrated the personal tragic scene of nagasaki after it was hit by an atomic bomb This dreadful description of a war stricken city is evident proof of the calamityi and grave tragedies suffered by innocent victims of war. It were enough to prove that war is only a disastrous entity which makes everyone a loser in the end because both enemy engaging in war undergo a great deal of devastation and destruction If we take an example of kashmir issue between pakistan and India we will mention the thrii historical wars occurred in 1947 1965 1971 between two countries Both of countries lost their millions of people loved ones neighbours resources BUut could not resolve the kashmir issue. Then how one country can say that it is the winner of that war but only loser because that country which was involved in war lost its countries people resources If one country involves in a war,it loses all its hegemony in all over the world. I conclude my topic by saying that not only fatal wars between countries or NNations result in loss of every innocent life and destruction of every single commodity but the same tragedy occurs in all kinds of wars, conflict.The conflict between different races families people to people also cause immense psychological and mental pain to all members involved. These trivial fights not only destroy the peace of a society or country but can also cause extreme mental torture As a result these apparently trivial arguments lead ultimately to both the moral and mental loss for each member that involveD in any conflict It therefore proves the fact that all kinds of war, be they fatal or trivial, have one aspect in common… all loserRR and NOo victors. All wars are follies very expensive and very mischievous ones In my opinion, there never was a good war or a bad peace. When will mankind be convinced and agree to settle their difficulties by arbitration/ At the end NOow I can easily say that in war there are no winners but loSeR Alas. FINAL DRAFT Nobody needs any further clarification to the meaning of war, everyone knows what war is. It is a physical conflict between two or more countries. When a war sweeps through a continent or country, nothing is left intact in its wake. It brings about widespread famine, misery, destruction and death. Millions of lives of the citizens of the opposing countries, how can the winners and losers be defined? That is quite impossible! In a war, there are no winners, only losers. Losers who cannot resolve their conflicts and differences by peaceful means, losers who lost millions of lives and resources losers who are losers always. Losers resort to war because they cannot resolve conflicts peacefully, winners do not go to arms, and they solve conflicts diplomatically. In any war, there will be two opposing sides, or maybe more, but what remains as solid as stone is the fact that lives from all sides are lost in the battle, taken by the grim reaper who turns a blind eye to any allegiance one may have, regardless of victory or defeat. In the end, it is humanity as a whole which loses. If the winners of wars are not the winners, then does it make the losers the winners? I do not think so. They have lost too. They have lost their civilians, their armies, their territories, their resources and their pride. The winners also suffer the same fate as the losers in a war, both have a large number of casualties and also suffer the same negative repercussions of war, such as social upheaval and economic disruptions. Nobody benefits from a war. Everyone loses. In any war, there will be casualties and penalties for both sides, the winners and losers even if you are the winner, it is only superficial. The casualties are still there, that is a hard fact which no one can ignore. Only when the day comes at the end of the war, when only one side suffers casualties and the negative effects of war, then we can truly identify between the winner and loser. When countries win a war, it just shows that they are better at fighting than their opponents. Since both sides have devastated each other’s. In order to support my topic, I will explain it with the help of historical examples of wars such as world war 1, world war 2, japan attack pakistan india conflict on kashmir issue. We all would be very familiar to these brutal occasions which were held in our history. they bring about widespread famine, misery, destruction and death. This dreadful description of a war stricken city is evident proof of the calamities and grave tragedies suffered by innocent victims of war. It is enough to prove that war is only a disastrous entity which makes everyone a loser in the end both enemies engaging in war undergo a great deal of devastation and destruction. If we take an example of kashmir issue between pakistan and India, we will mention the three historical wars occurred in 1947, 1965, 1971 between two countries. Both of countries lost their millions of people, loved ones, neighbours, resources but could not resolve the kashmir issue. Then how one country can say that it is the winner of that war but only loser because that country which was involved in war lost its countries people, resources. If one country involves in a war,it loses all its hegemony in all over the world. I conclude my topic by saying that not only fatal wars between countries or nations result in loss of every innocent life and destruction of every single commodity, but the same tragedy occurs in all kinds of wars, conflict.The conflict between different races, families, people to people also causes immense psychological and mental pain to all members involved. These trivial fights not only destroy the peace of a society or country but can also cause extreme mental torture. As a result, these apparently trivial arguments lead ultimately to both the moral and mental loss for each member that involves in any conflict. It therefore proves the fact that all kinds of war, be they fatal or trivial, have one aspect in common: all losers and no victors. All wars are follies, very expensive and very mischievous ones. In my opinion, there never was a good war or a bad peace. When will mankind be convinced and agree to settle their difficulties by arbitration? At the end, now I can easily say that in war there are no winners but losers. Alas!