Student Copy of SOAP Note Project Rubric

Graded Component s DISTINGUISHED PROFICIENT The student was able to include all of the requirements: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. The student was able to partially include all of the requirements: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. The student was not partially able to include all of the requirements: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, & Plan. The student correctly placed the content in the appropriate category. The student misplaced some of the content into the wrong categories. The student correctly placed the content in the appropriate category. Content (20 points) The student did clear, in-depth research on the condition and included correct information regarding the condition. The student included the medical condition/diagnosis with the definition of the last slide. Creativity (10 points) The assignment was exceptionally clever and unique in showing deep understanding. The student did little basic research on the condition and did not use many details in describing the signs/symptoms. The student included the medical condition/diagnosis with the definition of the last slide. The assignment was thoughtful and uniquely presented. ADEQUATE The student used only information off of the slides provided in class, and did little to no extra research. The student did or did not include the medical condition/diagnosis with the definition on the last slide. The assignment was clever at all times in showing understanding of the material. A few original touches enhance the project to show some understanding of the material. NEEDS IMPROVEMENT The student did not include all of the requirements: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan. The student did not correctly place the information into the appropriate category. The student used no additional research to correctly describe the medical condition. The student did not include the medical condition/diagnosis with the definition on the last slide. The assignment shows little creativity, originality and/or effort in understanding the material. The assignment was neat, clean, and turned in using a Google Slide presentation. Turned in ON TIME to Google Classroom. The assignment was partially neat, clean, and turned in a typed Google Slide format and turned into Google Classroom. Spelling/Gr ammar (5 points) No grammatical or mechanical mistakes in the project. A few grammatical/ mechanical mistakes, which are not distracting. Resources (5 points) The student included a minimum of 3 sources and they were in MLA format. Answers to Other Student’s Projects (10 points) The student wrote down an answer to all other presentations and made an educated guess based on the information presented. Neatness (5 points) Comments: Final Grade: /55 The student included a minimum of 3 sources, but they were not in MLA format. The student wrote down an answer to most other presentations and made an educated guess based on the information presented. The assignment was difficult to follow and did not have a neat flow. The assignment was not neat, clean and was not turned in a typed document file and posted on google classroom. Several grammatical/ mechanical mistakes, which are distracting. Many grammatical or mechanical mistakes throughout the project. Clearly did not proofread. The student did not include at least 3 sources and they were not in MLA format. The student did not list any sources. The student did not answer a majority of the other presentations. The student did not answer any of the other presentations.