English Answer Note #18

Question 1 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION ABOUT THE “Silliman in the Seventies: A Personal Journey (for Carlos Ojeda Aureus) Anthony L. Tan” in a summarized and humanized way. 1. What is the essay all about? Answer: 2. Whose life is discussed in the text? Answer: 3. Where does the narrator come from? Answer: 4. How was the life of the narrator during his stay in Silliman University? Answer: 5. In the essay, what type of language is used? Answer: 6. What have you observed on the use of words by the writer? Answer: 7. Does the writer convey the message of the essay? Why do you say so? Answer: Answer 1. What is the essay all about? Answer: The essay, "Silliman in the Seventies: A Personal Journey (for Carlos Ojeda Aureus)" by Anthony L. Tan, is a nostalgic account of the author's experiences and memories during his time as a student at Silliman University in the 1970s. 2. Whose life is discussed in the text? Answer: The life of the narrator, Anthony L. Tan, is discussed in the text. 3. Where does the narrator come from? Answer: The narrator comes from the province of Cebu in the Philippines. 4. How was the life of the narrator during his stay in Silliman University? Answer: The life of the narrator during his stay in Silliman University was filled with memorable experiences, personal growth, and intellectual development. He formed strong bonds with his fellow students and teachers, and was exposed to diverse perspectives and cultures. 5. In the essay, what type of language is used? Answer: The essay uses a combination of descriptive, personal, and reflective language to evoke a sense of nostalgia and emotion. 6. What have you observed on the use of words by the writer? Answer: The writer uses vivid and sensory language to effectively convey his memories and experiences, making the essay engaging and relatable. 7. Does the writer convey the message of the essay? Why do you say so? Answer: Yes, the writer successfully conveys the message of the essay – to look back on and appreciate the impact of one's formative years on personal development. This is evident through the author's detailed and reflective descriptions of his time in Silliman University. 2. Question 2 Now read the article "We are suffering from an empathy gap, but we can fix it" How does the author establish their own authority? Answer The author of the article "We are suffering from an empathy gap, but we can fix it" establishes their authority through various means. Firstly, the author uses a formal and informative writing style, which indicates their knowledge and understanding of the topic. Additionally, the author uses credible sources, such as research studies and expert opinions, to support their arguments and claims. Moreover, the author's use of personal experiences and real-life examples helps to establish their authority as they are able to provide a relatable and authentic perspective. The author also presents logical and well-structured arguments, which demonstrate their expertise on the subject matter. Furthermore, the article is published in a reputable and scholarly online platform, Psychology Today, which signifies the author's credibility and expertise in the field of psychology. The author also includes their qualifications and experience in the bio section at the end of the article, further solidifying their authority on the topic. Question 3 Now read the article "We are suffering from an empathy gap, but we can fix it" by Jennifer Rubin How does the author establish their own authority? Answer In her article, "We are suffering from an empathy gap, but we can fix it", Jennifer Rubin establishes her authority through a combination of relevant experience, referenced sources, and unbiased analysis. Firstly, Rubin introduces herself as a political commentator and journalist for The Washington Post. This immediately establishes her credibility as a professional in the field of politics and current events. Additionally, she mentions her previous work on the topic of empathy and bias in politics, highlighting her expertise and experience on the subject. Moreover, Rubin supports her arguments with references to academic sources, such as a study by the American Psychological Association on the "empathy gap" in relationships. This not only strengthens her argument, but also shows that she has conducted thorough research and is knowledgeable on the topic. She also acknowledges opposing views and provides counterarguments, demonstrating her neutral and unbiased perspective. This further emphasizes her credibility as an authoritative figure in her field of study. Furthermore, Rubin's use of logical and evidence-based reasoning strengthens her authority as a writer. She presents statistics and examples to back up her claims and uses logical reasoning to connect different aspects of empathy and its role in society. Lastly, the inclusion of her personal experiences and interactions with individuals who lack empathy adds a personal touch to her argument, making it more relatable and further supporting her authority on the topic. Overall, through her professional background, use of credible sources, unbiased analysis, and logical reasoning, Jennifer Rubin effectively establishes her authority as a writer and expert on the topic of empathy and its role in society. Question 4 In the research essay you are writing, your genre is obvious – it’s a research essay and it is a form of academic writing. What do you think is the context in which you will be writing? What do you need to know first before you can answer the above more specifically? How will you determine your audience for writing in this situation? How will you determine the purpose of your research essay (beyond earning a grade or fulfilling a class requirement)? Answer As a high-performing College student, I understand that writing a research essay involves more than just presenting information. It requires a thorough understanding of the context in which the essay will be written, as well as the audience and purpose of the research. To answer these questions, I will first need to gather information and resources from academic sources. According to the Oxford University Press, academic writing is "writing done for scholarly purposes, usually as a result of research or study in an academic field". This means that the context in which I will be writing is within the realm of academia, where the focus is on knowledge, research, and critical thinking. Therefore, my research essay will need to follow the conventions and standards of academic writing, including proper citation and formatting. Before I can answer the above questions more specifically, I will need to have a clear understanding of the topic and research question of my essay. This will require conducting thorough research from credible sources such as scholarly journals, textbooks, and conference proceedings. Additionally, I will need to critically analyze the information gathered to ensure that my essay provides a well-rounded and evidencebased argument. In terms of determining my audience for writing in this situation, I will consider the purpose of my essay and the discipline in which it falls under. For instance, if my research essay is for a psychology class, my audience would primarily consist of my professor and classmates who are familiar with the field of psychology. However, I can also consider a broader audience of experts and professionals in the field who may find my research relevant and valuable. Determining the purpose of my research essay will depend on my initial research question. While the immediate purpose may be to earn a grade or fulfill a class requirement, I must also consider the long-term purpose of my research. This could range from contributing to the existing body of knowledge in the field, providing insights for future research, or even making an impact in real-world applications. Question 5 Refer to the excerpt from "Democracy in America." Then, choose the best answer. Use a dictionary resource for any words you do not understand. When figuring out the meaning of a word, use the context (its surrounding text) to help determine the correct dictionary meaning. Which organizational design does the restated thesis at the end of the essay support? topical problem/solution cause/effect chronological Answer The restated thesis at the end of the excerpt from "Democracy in America" supports a chronological organizational design. This can be seen in the structure of the essay, where the author presents a historical overview of democratic governments and how they have evolved. The restated thesis, "Democracy in America was established through the gradual progress of history rather than by sudden violent upheaval," suggests that the author is presenting the evolution of democracy in America in a chronological order. In an organizational design, the chronological approach is used when presenting events, ideas, or information in a sequential order. This allows the reader to understand the progression and development of a topic. In this case, the author first discusses the origins of democracy in America, then moves on to its establishment and evolution, and finally concludes with a restated thesis that reflects the chronological progression of democracy in America.