Deviant Behavior and Theoretical Approach
In sociology, deviant behavior is a type of behavior or action that violates the social
norms or formally-enacted rules of the society (Gibbs, 2017). Deviance can either be formal or
informal. Formal deviance may include criminal actions such as robbery, assaults, murder, rapes,
and thefts. On the other hand, informal deviance includes rejection of the folkways and mores,
belching loudly, public nose-picking of others, and standing unnecessarily close to someone.
In this regard, the theoretical approach that best explains deviant behavior is conflict
theory. This theory considers both social and economic elements as the major causes of deviance
(Cole, 2017). Unlike functionalists, conflict theorists consider such factors as proof of inequality
within the system. Also, they challenge social disorganization and control models as they argue
that other theories ignore the essential tenets such as racial and socioeconomic issues as well as
oversimplify the social trends. This approach tries to look for answers to the relationships of
gender and race with wealth and crime. This approach also suggests that economic capitalism
leads to crime and deviance (Cole, 2017). It means that when an individual is raised without
resources to have a better life may develop deviant behaviors like prostitution, robbery, thefts or
drugs, etc.
One of the strengths of this theory is the implication of power relationships in
determining, identifying, and handling deviance. It provides an influential view of how an
injustice society nurtures crime and injustices between the privileged and underprivileged groups
in society. However, the theory has some weaknesses too. For instance, it is pointed out that the
law protects everyone, including the wealthy. Additionally, examples of deviant behavior that led
to positive outcomes are the actions of civil rights activists such as Martin Luther King Jr. and
Malcolm X. The two remain figures of deviance in a bid to fight against racial oppression. While
growing up, I was never faced with a high-risk situation as I attended Christian schools, and
discipline was key. However, as I got older, I started rebelling about most of the things I used to
do as a child. Due to peer-group influence, I started doing drugs, although I did not receive any
sanction for trying drugs.