Proficiency Scores Task 3

lOMoARcPSD|23780900 Proficiency scores Students Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 Student 20 Overall Summative Proficiency Score 3.00 2.25 1.50 1.75 1.63 3.25 1.63 2.38 2.88 1.75 1.13 2.25 2.75 3.13 1.38 2.25 2.75 1.75 1.25 3.00 *Note: I attached my original random data set spreadsheet that I was assigned with my submission, along with a separate spreadsheet that I made as I analyzed the data. The name of the sheet is Data Set. Scoring methodology I determined every learner's overall summative proficiency score by evaluating every learner's proficiency scores for the eight assessments and determining the average score for every learner. The average proficiency scores are a representation of the learners' performance for all the assessments. Disaggregated Data Five groups were formed from the twenty students in the class. Subgroup 1 had ten students with an overall summative proficiency score of 2.13. Subgroup 2 had eleven lOMoARcPSD|23780900 students with an overall summative proficiency score of 2.15. Subgroup 3 had thirteen students with an overall summative proficiency score of 2.43. Subgroup 4 had six students with an overall summative proficiency score of 1.54. Subgroup 5 had five students with an overall summative proficiency score of 1.93. I want to clarify that I rounded all subgroups' averages to two decimal places. Pattern of Scores All the twenty learners' proficiency scores trended in a positive direction throughout completing the eight assessments. The scores on assessment eight were higher than on assessment one. Each leaner overall proficiency score average was higher on their initial score on assessment one. Therefore, the data concludes that all the students made progress in their learning of the measurement topic, although some learners made more considerable strides than others. Four students individually completed the overall proficiency score average between three and four. Based on the data, I can conclude that four students can be considered proficient in measurement topics. Seven students individually finished with an overall proficiency score average between two and three. Based on the data, I can conclude that these seven students are developing proficiency in the measurement topic. Nine students individually finished with an overall proficiency score average between zero and two. Based on the data, I can conclude that these nine students can emerge in the measurement topic. As a class, 50% of the learners are considered between proficient and advanced in the measurement topic based on their overall score. The class overall proficiency average was rounded to 2.18. this score would categorize the class as a whole as developing proficiency in the measurement. Outliers lOMoARcPSD|23780900 The glaring outliers were the proficiency scores of students eleven, fifteen, and nineteen. Student eleven, fifteen, and nineteen never made a proficiency score of above two on any assessments. These three learners also had overall average proficiency scores that were less than 1.50. Student eleven scored a 1 or 2 on all the assessments and had an overall proficiency score of 1.13. These three outliers represented 15% of the class. Subgroups According to the disaggregated data in subgroups 1, 2, and 3, I can conclude that the students in this group are between developing proficiency and being proficient in the measurement topic. According to the disaggregated data in subgroups 4 and 5, I can conclude that the students in this group are below emerging in the measurement topic. The students in these groups have the lowest average proficiency score of all the groups and need significant improvement in their learning of the measurement topic. APA Sources *No outside sources were used for this task