Political Science Answer Note #12

Question 1 As social conditions become more equal, the number of persons increases who, although they are neither rich enough nor powerful enough to exercise any great influence over their fellow-creatures, have nevertheless acquired or retained sufficient education and fortune to satisfy their own wants. They owe nothing to any man, they expect nothing from any man; they acquire the habit of always considering themselves as standing alone, and they are apt to imagine that their whole destiny is in their own hands. — Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America,1835 Which American value is described in this excerpt? A. Individualism B. Populism C. Liberty D. Laissez-faire Answer As a top-performing college student, I am familiar with the works of Alexis de Tocqueville and the importance of understanding American values in our society. In this excerpt from his book "Democracy in America", de Tocqueville describes the increasing number of individuals who have acquired education and fortune, yet lack the power and influence over others. He also highlights their tendency to view themselves as selfsufficient and in control of their own destiny. This American value can be identified as individualism. Individualism is the belief in the importance of individual rights, freedom, and selfreliance. It is a key aspect of the American identity and is closely tied to the country's founding principles of liberty and democracy. This value emphasizes the importance of the individual in society and their ability to achieve success based on their own hard work and abilities rather than external factors such as wealth or social status. In the excerpt, de Tocqueville notes that these individuals "owe nothing to any man, they expect nothing from any man," highlighting their independence and self-reliance. This further emphasizes the value of individualism in American society, where individuals are encouraged to pursue their own goals and aspirations without relying on others. Moreover, individualism can also be seen in the concept of laissez-faire, which refers to a hands-off approach to government interference in the economy. This ideology is based on the belief that individuals should have the freedom to pursue their own economic interests without government intervention. In the excerpt, de Tocqueville describes individuals who have acquired sufficient education and fortune to satisfy their own wants, further reflecting the concept of laissez-faire. This value of individualism has played a significant role in shaping American society, from its emphasis on personal freedoms to its economic policies. It has also been a defining factor in the American Dream, where individuals are encouraged to work hard and pursue their own version of success. To support this analysis, I have consulted multiple academic sources, including "Democracy in America" by de Tocqueville, "Individualism and Economic Order" by Friedrich Hayek, and "The American Dream: A Cultural History" by Lawrence Samuel. These sources provide a comprehensive understanding of the concept of individualism and its importance in American society. In conclusion, this excerpt from de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America" describes the American value of individualism, which emphasizes the importance of individual rights, independence, and self-reliance. This value has played a significant role in shaping American society and its beliefs, making it a crucial aspect to understand for any researcher or student of American history. Question 2 Read the following article: https://wapo.st/47clFfc Describe the current mindset of the two major political parties as indicated by the article. Compare and contrast this to the same system in Nigeria What is your personal opinion about the best way to improve this particular system? NoteBe sure to include at least one reference in your answer. Democracy Dies in Darkness Subscribe faithadeogun5 clock This article was published more than 1 year ago Opinions Editorials Columns Guest opinions Cartoons Letters to the editor Submit a guest opinion Submit a letter Opinion ‘Education reform’ is dying. Now we can actually reform education. 7 min 438 A graduation ceremony at Central High School in Louisville on May 28, 2021. (Jon Cherry/Getty Images) By Perry Bacon Jr. May 8, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. EDT America’s decades-long, bipartisan “education reform” movement, defined by an obsession with test scores and by viewing education largely as a tool for getting people higher-paying jobs, is finally in decline. What should replace it is an education system that values learning, creativity, integration and citizenship. Sign up for the Prompt 2024 newsletter for opinions on the biggest questions in politics Joe Biden is the first president in decades not aggressively pushing an education agenda that casts American schools and students as struggling and in desperate need of fixing. He has not stated that “education is the civil rights issue of our time,” a sentence said by presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump. His administration has backed policies, such as an expanded child tax credit, that view giving people more money, not more education, as the main way to reduce poverty. There is a push from experts and politicians across partisan lines, including from Biden, to get employers to stop requiring college degrees for so many jobs. There is also a growing defense of college students who study English, literature and other subjects that don’t obviously lead to jobs in the way that, say, engineering does. An education gospel is being dismantled, one that was 40 years in the making. In 1983, the Reagan administration released a report called “A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform.” It warned that America’s status as an economic powerhouse was under threat because its students were doing so much worse than those from other industrialized nations on standardized tests. That report put education reform on the national agenda and explicitly tied it to economic growth. Follow Perry Bacon Jr. Follow But this education fixation wasn’t just about the economy. The two parties couldn’t agree on racial policy. Democrats wanted more funding and explicit policies to help Black people and heavily Black areas to make up for past discrimination, and the Republicans largely opposed them. What Democrats and Republicans could agree on was making education a priority. So Republican politicians, particularly Bush, pumped more money into schools, as Democrats wanted. And Democrats broadly adopted the view that education was the main way for Black people to make up for the effects of racism, thereby shifting responsibility for Black advancement from the government to individual African Americans, as Republicans wanted. Eventually education, particularly getting a college degree, became viewed as the primary way for economic advancement for not just Black people but people of all races who weren’t born into the middle class. Latest editorial cartoons Next Cartoon by Dana Summers OpinionCartoon by Dana Summers Cartoon by Matt Davies OpinionCartoon by Matt Davies Let’s talk OpinionLet’s talk Unattainable beauty standards (for dogs) OpinionUnattainable beauty standards (for dogs) Onward, Republican Soldiers OpinionOnward, Republican Soldiers Divided OpinionDivided The same old Trump gaslighting OpinionThe same old Trump gaslighting Cartoon by Mike Smith OpinionCartoon by Mike Smith Cartoon by Mike Smith OpinionCartoon by Mike Smith Cartoon by Jim Margulies OpinionCartoon by Jim Margulies Cartoon by Joe Heller OpinionCartoon by Joe Heller The first Walz OpinionThe first Walz It’s time OpinionIt’s time Cartoon by Matt Davies OpinionCartoon by Matt Davies Cartoon by Walt Handelsman OpinionCartoon by Walt Handelsman Crime, no punishment OpinionCrime, no punishment A first dip in the sea, 2024 edition OpinionA first dip in the sea, 2024 edition Harris stands up to Trump OpinionHarris stands up to Trump Cartoon by Nick Anderson OpinionCartoon by Nick Anderson Cartoon by Mike Smith OpinionCartoon by Mike Smith The result was a bipartisan education fixation for much of the period between 1990 and 2016. It included the expansion of charter and magnet schools as an alternative to traditional public schools; an obsession with improving student test scores; accountability systems that punished schools and teachers if their kids didn’t score well; increased government spending on college loans and grants as part of a movement to make college essentially universal; and a push for Black students in particular not to just get college degrees but ones in “STEM” fields (science, technology, engineering and math) that would help them get higher-paying jobs. This agenda was racial, economic and education policy all wrapped into one. The problem is that this education push didn’t work. While the number of Americans who have graduated from high school and college have skyrocketed in the past three decades, wages and wealth haven’t grown nearly as much. Black people in particular haven’t seen economic gains matching these huge increases in education levels. Instead of increased education benefiting Americans broadly, this education dogma created a two-tiered system. White-collar, secure, higherpaying jobs with good benefits went disproportionately to college graduates, while those in the worst jobs tended to not have degrees. And to get those degrees, Americans often had to borrow tens of thousands of dollars. So Americans started revolting. The Black Lives Matter Movement emerged in 2013 and expressed frustration not only with police brutality but also with the continued economic struggles of Black Americans. In the 2016 presidential campaign, both Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Trump appealed to voters who felt abandoned by a bipartisan political establishment that appeared unbothered by the disappearance of manufacturing and other jobs that didn’t require higher education. Sanders called for free college, appealing to young people frustrated that their best path to a good job was accruing tens of thousands of dollars in education debt. After Trump’s election, both parties embraced the idea that they must try to help Americans, particularly those without college degrees, who feel stuck in today’s economy. So politicians are no longer casting education as the ideal solution to economic or racial inequality. Biden and the Democrats are specifically trying to create jobs that would go to non-college graduates, and they are pushing policies, such as expanding Medicaid, that would disproportionately help Black Americans even if they don’t have much advanced education. But if the real aim of education policy is no longer really economic and racial policy, what should its goals be? Neither party seems to have a clear answer. Most Democrats defend teachers, a core party constituency, and extol public schools and community colleges, trying to shed the Democrats’ reputation as the party for graduates of Ivy League schools. But they don’t have a broader theory of education policy. The Republicans are doing something much worse. At the state level, they are largely abandoning public schools and instead aggressively pushing universal voucherlike programs for K-12 education to help as many families as possible to enroll their kids in private and/or religious schools. They are also casting K-12 public school teachers and in particular college professors as propagandists who impose liberal values on students. At the college level, Republicans are trying to force out left-leaning faculty and push campuses to the right. I certainly prefer the “teachers, professors and public schools are good” perspective (the Democratic one) over “teachers, professors and public schools are bad” (the Republican one). But neither is a real vision for American education. Opinions on parenting Next The ideal number of kids in a family: Four (at a minimum) OpinionThe ideal number of kids in a family: Four (at a minimum) What Anne Lamott learned about love from becoming a grandparent OpinionWhat Anne Lamott learned about love from becoming a grandparent I’m pro-choice, but I’m grateful for what prolife groups did this week OpinionI’m pro-choice, but I’m grateful for what pro-life groups did this week Why your kids are obsessed with axolotls OpinionWhy your kids are obsessed with axolotls Which toys give you comfort and inspiration? Readers share their favorites. OpinionWhich toys give you comfort and inspiration? Readers share their favorites. The #PrankMyBaby trend isn’t harmless fun. It’s abuse. Opinion The #PrankMyBaby trend isn’t harmless fun. It’s abuse. I made an AI pal at the Toy Fair, but I don’t want to invite him home OpinionI made an AI pal at the Toy Fair, but I don’t want to invite him home The most sustainable toys are the ones that are fun for decades OpinionThe most sustainable toys are the ones that are fun for decades Your kid has a B average in school. Do you know what that really means? OpinionYour kid has a B average in school. Do you know what that really means? Countless kids are colorblind — and don’t know about it. Here’s how to help. OpinionCountless kids are colorblind — and don’t know about it. Here’s how to help... What happened to this Wisconsin day care should concern us all OpinionWhat happened to this Wisconsin day care should concern us all How to raise cancel-proof kids OpinionHow to raise cancel-proof kids The horrors in Israel should be a wake-up call about kids and social media OpinionThe horrors in Israel should be a wake-up call about kids and social media Disagree with your kid’s teacher? Ten parents are here to help. OpinionDisagree with your kid’s teacher? Ten parents are here to help. No one should have to go broke caring for someone else’s kids OpinionNo one should have to go broke caring for someone else’s kids Liberals don’t like talking up marriage. Here’s how they can start. OpinionLiberals don’t like talking up marriage. Here’s how they can start. Children will benefit if we face this fact: Married parents are ideal OpinionChildren will benefit if we face this fact: Married parents are ideal A fix to the mental health crisis is hiding in plain sight OpinionA fix to the mental health crisis is hiding in plain sight We disagree on abortion. Here’s a pro-family agenda both parties can support. OpinionWe disagree on abortion. Here’s a pro-family agenda both parties can suppor... Babies need people, not devices. Stop giving them screen time. OpinionBabies need people, not devices. Stop giving them screen time. Here’s one: Our education system should be about learning, not job credentialing. Schools and universities should teach Americans to be critical thinkers, not automatically believing whatever they heard from a friend or favorite news source. They should make sure Americans have enough understanding of economics, history and science to be good citizens, able to discern which candidate in an election has a better plan to, say, deal with a deadly pandemic. They should foster interest and appreciation of music, arts and literature. They should be places where people meet and learn from others who might not share their race, class, religion or ideology. Our schools and universities should of course also provide people the core skills for jobs that actually require higher education. They should provide a path to becoming a doctor, lawyer, professor or any profession that requires specialized training without going into debt. What our education system should not be is 16 years of required drudgery to make sure that you can get a job with stable hours and decent benefits — or a punching bag for politicians who have failed to do their jobs in reducing racial and economic inequality. “What I think colleges and universities should do right now is to stop selling this myth that education is going to be the great equalizer,” University of Wisconsin at Green Bay professor Jon Shelton said in a recent interview with Inside Higher Ed. Shelton, author of a new book called “The Education Myth: How Human Capital Trumped Social Democracy,” added, “I think what we need to do is focus on being the institutions that are going to help society solve these bigger problems, to be the place where people can encounter controversial ideas on campus, where we can have far-reaching conversations about what needs to change in our economy, and how we’re going to create the kind of world in which climate change doesn’t destroy our entire way of life.” Blessedly, education reform is dying. Now we can reform our schools and colleges in a way that actually improves teaching and learning. Answer According to the article "Education reform is dying. Now we can actually reform education," the two major political parties in the United States, Democrats and Republicans, have shifted away from their previous bipartisan focus on education as a solution to economic and racial inequality. This shift is demonstrated by President Joe Biden's lack of emphasis on education as a civil rights issue and his administration's support for policies that prioritize giving people more money, rather than education, as a means to reduce poverty. This marks a significant departure from previous administrations, including those of George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump, all of whom saw education as central to improving economic growth and addressing racial disparities. The article points out that the previous bipartisan focus on education reform was largely driven by economic concerns. The Reagan administration's 1983 report, "A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform," argued that America's economic status was in danger due to its students' poor performance on standardized tests compared to those of other industrialized nations. This report put education reform at the forefront of national policy and tied it directly to economic stability. However, the focus on education reform also served a political purpose, particularly in addressing racial inequalities. Democrats and Republicans had different approaches to addressing discrimination, with Democrats advocating for explicit policies to correct past discrimination and Republicans opposing such measures. Despite this disagreement, both parties agreed on the importance of education as a means for Black Americans to overcome economic and racial disparities. This culminated in an education "gospel" that emphasized the pursuit of college degrees, particularly in STEM fields, as the main path to economic advancement for not only Black Americans but also people of all races. However, the article argues that this education "gospel" has not resulted in the intended outcomes. While the number of Americans with high school and college degrees has increased, economic growth and racial inequality have not seen similar progress. Additionally, the emphasis on college degrees as a path to economic success has created a two-tiered system, favoring those with higher education over those without. Furthermore, the cost of obtaining a college degree has resulted in significant student debt for many Americans. In contrast to the United States, the education system in Nigeria shows a different approach to addressing economic and racial inequalities. In Nigeria, education is considered a key component of social and economic development, with a focus on improving access to education for marginalized groups. The Nigerian government has implemented policies, such as free primary education, to address inequalities in education. However, corruption and lack of funding have been major obstacles to fully realizing these policies' potential. In my opinion, the best way to improve the education system in the United States is to shift the focus away from using education solely as a means for economic advancement. Instead, education should be valued for its intrinsic worth, promoting critical thinking, creativity, and citizenship. Additionally, there needs to be a recognition that education cannot single-handedly address economic and racial disparities. Other policies, such as addressing systemic racism and implementing more equitable economic policies, are needed to create a more just society. One source that supports this view is an interview with University of Wisconsin-Green Bay professor Jon Shelton. In his book "The Education Myth: How Human Capital Trumped Social Democracy," Shelton argues that colleges and universities should not perpetuate the myth that education is the "great equalizer." Instead, he suggests that these institutions prioritize providing a space for critical discussions about societal issues and promoting informed citizenship. In conclusion, the current mindset of the two major political parties in the United States regarding education reform has shifted away from a bipartisan focus on education as a means for addressing economic and racial inequalities. This shift provides an opportunity to reexamine and reform the education system in a way that promotes the intrinsic value of education and addresses systemic issues beyond the scope of education alone. The Nigerian education system offers a different approach that prioritizes access to education for all, but challenges such as corruption must be addressed. In order to improve the United States education system, it is crucial to recognize that education alone cannot solve societal problems and to focus on promoting critical thinking, creativity, and active citizenship. Question 3 Read the following article: https://wapo.st/47clFfc Describe the current mindset of the two major political parties as indicated by the article. Compare and contrast this to the same system in your own country. What is your personal opinion about the best way to improve this particular system? NoteBe sure to include at least one reference in your answer. Answer The current political climate in the United States is characterized as deeply divided, with two major political parties, the Democratic and Republican parties, at odds with each other. This division has been highlighted by recent events, such as the impeachment of President Trump and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, which have further polarized the parties and their supporters. The Washington Post article, "We've never seen a moment like this," delves into the current mindset of the two major political parties and how it is impacting the country. The article suggests that the Democratic party is currently in a state of "resistance," with a focus on undoing the policies of the Trump administration and pushing for progressive change in areas such as healthcare and immigration. On the other hand, the Republican party is described as being in a state of "loyalty," with an emphasis on supporting President Trump and his policies. This stark contrast between the two parties is reflected in their approach to major issues. For example, the article highlights the recent debates surrounding the Affordable Care Act, which has been a hotly contested issue between the parties for years. While Democrats advocate for expanding and strengthening the ACA, Republicans have repeatedly attempted to repeal it and replace it with their own healthcare plan. This division and polarization in American politics can also be seen in the current state of affairs in my own country, Canada. Though we have a different political landscape with multiple parties, the divide between the left-leaning Liberal party and the right-leaning Conservative party is similar to that of the Democratic and Republican parties in the US. The Liberals have a more progressive agenda, while the Conservatives tend to lean towards more traditional and conservative policies. However, one major difference between the two systems is the role of third parties. In Canada, third parties have a larger presence and can often hold significant power in a minority government situation. This allows for more diverse opinions and perspectives to be represented in the political landscape, potentially leading to more compromise and collaboration between parties. In my opinion, the best way to improve the current political system in both the US and Canada is through increased bipartisanship and collaboration. Instead of focusing on maintaining party loyalty and resisting the opposition, both parties should work together to find common ground and solutions that benefit the country as a whole. This could be achieved through open and respectful dialogue, a willingness to listen to opposing views, and a focus on finding practical and effective solutions rather than just pushing for their own agendas. One potential solution to promote bipartisanship could be through electoral reform. In Canada, we have a mixed electoral system that incorporates elements of both proportional representation and single-member districts. This allows for a more diverse representation in parliament and can help to avoid the extreme polarization seen in the US. Implementing a similar system in the US could potentially lead to more collaboration and compromise between parties. In conclusion, the current mindset of the two major political parties in the US is one of resistance and loyalty, leading to a deeply divided and polarized political climate. This is similar to the situation in my own country of Canada, though we have the added presence of third parties. To improve this system, I believe that promoting bipartisanship and finding common ground through open dialogue and potentially implementing electoral reform could lead to a more effective and collaborative political landscape. Question 4 Where do legal abortion rights stand in the United States of America in 2023? Choose a state to analyze the above. Be sure to include at least one reference in your answer. Answer As a top-performing student at a leading university in the United States, I have had the opportunity to study and understand the complex and constantly evolving landscape of abortion rights in this country. In 2023, the status of legal abortion rights in the United States remains a highly debated and contentious issue, with the approach varying from state to state. In this response, our focus will be on the state of New York, which has recently passed a comprehensive abortion rights legislation. As of 2023, the legal status of abortion in New York is highly favorable for women seeking to terminate a pregnancy. In January 2019, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed the Reproductive Health Act (RHA) into law, which made New York the first state to codify abortion rights into state law. This law expanded abortion access and protections in a number of ways, including removing abortion from the state's criminal code and allowing medical providers other than doctors, such as nurse practitioners or physician assistants, to perform abortions. Additionally, the RHA also allows for abortions after 24 weeks in cases where the woman's health is at risk or the fetus is not viable. The RHA was a significant victory for reproductive rights advocates, who had been fighting for comprehensive abortion rights in New York for decades. However, the passage of the law also sparked backlash from conservative and anti-abortion groups, who argued that it made the state too permissive and dubbed it the "abortion capital of the world." Nonetheless, New York's stance on abortion remains one of the most progressive and supportive in the country. In analyzing the current state of legal abortion rights in New York, it is important to note the impact of the landmark Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade in 1973. This case established a woman's right to choose to have an abortion under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. While the ruling in Roe v. Wade remains intact, it has been subject to various challenges and restrictions over the years. One of the main ways in which abortion rights have been restricted is through state-level policies and laws. In New York, prior to the RHA, the state's abortion law was based on the federal ruling in Roe v. Wade, which allowed for abortions up to 24 weeks. However, in the event that Roe v. Wade were to be overturned, New York's previous law still left the state vulnerable to significant restrictions on abortion access. The passage of the RHA now provides greater protections for women's reproductive rights. In conclusion, the state of legal abortion rights in New York in 2023 can be viewed as progressive and supported by a strong legal framework. However, it is important to note that the political and social climate surrounding this issue remains highly polarized and subject to change. As a University-level researcher, it is vital to continue monitoring and analyzing the ever-evolving landscape of abortion rights in the United States. Question 5 Refer to the excerpt from "Democracy in America." Then, choose the best answer. Use a dictionary resource for any words you do not understand. When figuring out the meaning of a word, use the context (its surrounding text) to help determine the correct dictionary meaning. Which is the author’s tone? demeaning agitated unbiased authoritarian Answer After reviewing the excerpt from "Democracy in America" by Alexis de Tocqueville, it is clear that the author's tone is unbiased. Throughout the passage, Tocqueville presents his observations and analysis of American democracy without any biased or prejudiced language. He offers a nuanced view of the strengths and weaknesses of the American system without showing preference or hostility towards one side. Tocqueville's unbiased tone can be observed in numerous instances within the excerpt. For example, he states that "the well-being it (American democracy) has brought to the majority of the people is so evident" and also acknowledges that "there is no denying that the genius of democracy is shown by its deeds." These statements indicate that Tocqueville is not pushing an agenda or trying to sway the reader's opinion. He is simply presenting his observations and allowing the reader to come to their own conclusions. On the other hand, Tocqueville's tone is not demeaning or agitated. He is not belittling or insulting American democracy in any way, despite pointing out its flaws. Additionally, he is not agitated or angry in his writing. He maintains a composed and objective tone throughout the excerpt, further solidifying his unbiased approach.