Immigration is embedded in our country’s roots, and the history of immigration in our country is long. In today’s society, immigration has become an ethical dilemma and it has developed decades of debate. It is easy for some people to have an issue with immigrants in America, but there’s a...
Immigration is embedded in our country’s roots, and the history of immigration in our country is long. In today’s society, immigration has become an ethical dilemma and it has developed decades of debate. It is easy for some people to have an issue with immigrants in America, but there’s a part that a lot of people forget about in this world America was formed by immigrants. Immigrants come from every part of the world, there are four types of immigration status that exist: citizens, residents, non-immigrants, and undocumented. The purpose of this paper is to show the ethics of immigration and how immigration isn’t a bad thing.
The Different Groups that
There are two groups that have debates about immigration, there are the people who support it and the people who oppose it, but there isn’t a good way to settle the problem nor do both parties in the government seem to know how to fix the issue of immigration. To understand the current situation of the immigration policy in the United States we need to dig into its history of it, “in 1790, a law was passed to spell out who can be naturalized as a citizen the person had to be a resident for two years and a person with a good moral character. From 1875 to 1917, they limited or banned immigration from many parts of the world, mostly Asia. Then in the early 1920s laws were passed to limit the number of immigrants from southern and eastern Europe to favor immigrants from northern and western Europe and in 1965, congress passed the Immigration and Nationally Act, which radically changed immigration policy” (Vaughn). This year 2020, the trump administration has announced a proposal that would grant immigrants with green cards who meet requirements related to education, age, and English-speaking ability. The administration has previously proposed regulations that would deny immigrants entry to the U.S. or lawful permanent residence if they are likely to use Medicaid, the supplemental Nutrition assistance program, and other forms of public assistance (Pew Research).
Immigration helps America
These people dwell on the fact that immigrants are also human beings and that they are possibly looking to the United States in search for looking somewhere to be safe. The misconceptions of immigrants such as immigration harm the economy, and unauthorized immigration getting worse. Many people believe that immigration has an effect on the U.S. economy, but it if does, the impact is minimal, and the often-overlooked fact is that illegal immigrants are taxpayers. The anti-immigrant lobby tends to ignore the money the immigrants often pay in payroll and sales taxes while counting the money spent on the education of children born in the United States. Most research on the subjects shows that immigration helps the economy. “Unauthorized immigration isn’t actually worse it is decreasing, from 12.2 million in 2005 to 10.5 million in 2017. In the United States, immigration comes with complications with doing demographics, but immigrants help the United States, as immigrants work at high rates and makeup up more than a third of the workforce in some industries.” () Immigrants’ geographic mobility helps locals respond to worker shortages and help out the economy that is slowly getting weakened. Immigrants hold jobs that are important to our economy and communities, the ones that don’t have a college degree make up a sizeable share of the workers in current industries.
In continuation with help in the economy, immigrants help fill gaps in the U.S. economy. Immigrants contribute to native workers’ jobs and wages in sometimes hidden ways. This helps the native-born by filling the gaps that can make their jobs impossible or reduce their productivity and lower their wages. Immigrants also help support the aging in the U.S., they keep our numbers on the rise, with a low birth rate it can lead America into a decline in the labor force, and reduce demand in certain industries such as housing. This is important given that the baby boom generation is going to retirement by 2035 it is predicted that there will be only about 2.4 working-age adults in the U.S. for each person age 65 or older, fewer than in any prior decade on record and down from 4.7 working-age adults in 2016. Without immigrants, there would be fewer working-age adults and workers and they would make up a smaller proportion of the total population.
Consequentialist and non-consequentialist theories have been used to formulate arguments and claims about immigration. People who often think argue in a utilitarian vein, pointing out that open borders would have objectionable consequences. They believe that immigration must be put to a limit or halt to at least protect the nation’s distinctive culture. Americans can argue that borders should be closed for other utilitarian reasons: because it could disrupt the economy, break the welfare system, turn control of the country
The Parties Deciding What to do
The parties have different opinions on immigration, democracy, and republican. Democratic are fighting for immigrants, especially after Donald Trump’s threats and the things he has done since becoming president such as tearing families apart and putting people in cages. Democrats will continue to work towards comprehensive immigration reform that fixes our nation’s broken immigration system, improves border security, prioritizes enforcement to take in criminals, and strengthen our economy. Republican immigration laws and immigration reforms address the needs of national security. The party has always been divided on to exactly what extent immigration laws should be tightened, but as a whole, the party believes that a system needs to be in place to ensure that immigrants who enter this country illegally are not provided with the same benefits that legal citizens are. They believe in warmly welcoming those who enter the country through legal methods while devoting extra resources to keep out those who try to enter via illegal methods, as well as keeping track of those who enter and when they leave. Utilitarians feel that if we solve the problem it will satisfy everyone, but many people still think that if they allow illegal immigrants they will overrule and become the majority, which is not true. The government is having a hard time finding a solution that will satisfy everyone. Others feel like the best solution to immigration would stop immigrants from crossing the U.S. border.
Defending Immigration Rights
two different ways of defending immigration rights. We might defend these rights as ways of protecting against the persistent violation of other rights — rights to be free from poverty or oppression, say. Alternatively, we might defend these rights as rights that are important in themselves, much as we defend the right to free choice of occupation or the right to freedom of religion. If we focus on the facts of international poverty in our defense of immigration rights, we have to face up to the fact that the best response to this poverty may not be a universal right, given to everyone, to go anywhere they want to. A human right to cross borders, for example, would likely entail that rich Americans should have the right to go to Cuba, or Nicaragua, or Haiti, and purchase land on the same terms as the locals. While this might be defensible, it is far from clear that it is the only — or the best — response to the facts of objectionable poverty in these countries. The people who have been subjected to the violence of history, whose countries are neither representative nor rights-protective, might have rights virtue of this to cross borders to escape from poverty. But all this involves the development of particular rights, whereby some people have some rights to cross some borders. We have no reason to think that we can, from these materials, develop a universal right.
The Thing Administration Can Do
Governors can also nominate personnel appointed as a policy advisor supervising the agencies ‘ work monitoring both the conditions in detention centers and the safety, welfare, and experience of those being detained. It will keep the governors updated in near real-time as to progress, investigation directions, and findings. In addition, it can help recognize vulnerabilities or bureaucratic slackness that hinder comprehensive or full inquiries. Coordination from the governor’s office would help enhance coordination between agencies in ways that will help reduce overlap and strengthen collaboration between agencies. A coordinator or czar’s main objective would be to enforce policies to ensure that supervision and oversight continue into the future. In the medium term, this person will be responsible for requiring consistent reporting on the related issues from each agency with authority. The structured reporting will then be used by a coordinator to produce a wider interagency report on the handling of prisoners and the conditions inside detention centers. Such a study will offer in-depth and thorough insight into the condition of those housed in the immigration system of our nation as well as provide an insight into how persons imprisoned for crimes are housed and handled in neighborhoods during their incarceration or imp The solution to America’s immigration crisis will require a huge, organized effort among institutions of the federal government, state and local governments, and private bodies. This will entail assistance from Mexico and Central American countries to sustain conditions so unlivable that those countries ‘ people migrate to the north for economic opportunity, democracy, and protection.
425
