Chapter 3: Central Tendency
1. The purpose of central tendency is to
identify a single score that serves as the best
representative for an entire distribution,
usually a score from the center of the
distribution.
2. No single method for computing a measure
of central tendency works well in all
situations. With three different methods,
however, at least one usually works well
3. The mean is 27/10 = 2.7, the median is 2.5,
and the mode is 2.
4. For this sample, the mean, median, and
mode are all 7.
5. The mean is 40/12 = 3.33, the median is
3.50, and the mode is 4.
6. The mean is 152/20 = 7.6, the median is
7.5, and the mode is 7.
7. a. Median = 2.25
b. Median = 2
8. His median position is 2nd.
9. ΣX = 48.
10. ΣX = 250
11. The original sample has n = 8 and ΣX =
80. The new sample has n = 9 and ΣX = 81.
The new mean is M = 9.
14. The original sample has n = 5 and ΣX = 60.
The new sample has n = 4 and ΣX = 52. The
new mean is M = 13.
15. The new mean is 48/6 = 8. Changing X =
14 to X = 2 subtracts 12 points from ΣX .
16. The new mean is 176/8 = 22. Changing X
= 14 to X = 30 adds 16 points to ΣX .
17. The original sample has n = 7 and ΣX = 35.
The new sample has n = 8 and ΣX = 48. The
new score must be X = 13.
18. The original sample has n = 10 and ΣX =
90. The new sample has n = 9 and ΣX = 72.
The score that was removed must be X = 18.
19. a. The new mean is M = 6.
b. The new mean is (12 + 56)/10 = 6.8.
c. The new mean is (28 + 24)/10 = 5.2.
20. a. The new mean is 90/10 = 9.
b. The new mean is (24 + 96)/12 = 10
c. The new mean is (48 + 48)/12 = 8
21. The combined mean is (56 + 36)/10 = 9.2.
22. The combined mean is (1000 + 50)/25 =
42.
23. With a skewed distribution, the extreme
scores in the tail can displace the mean out
toward the tail. The result is that the mean is
often not a very representative value.
12. The new mean is 147/21 = 7.
13. The new mean is 198/9 = 22.
24. The median is used instead of the mean
when there is a skewed distribution (a few
extreme scores), an open-ended distribution,
undetermined scores, or an ordinal scale. 25. a. median (a few extreme scores would
distort the mean)
b. mode (nominal scale)
c. mean
26. a. Mode = 2
b. Median = 2
c. You cannot find the total number of
fast-food visits (ΣX) for this sample.
27. a.
5 │
│
4 │
┌───┐
│
│
│
3 │
┌───┬───┤
│
│
│
│
│
│
2 │
┌───┐
│
│
│
├───┐
┌───┐
f
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
1 │ ┌───┬───┤
├───┤
│
│
│
├───┤
│
│ │
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
│
└─┴───┴───┴───┴───┴───┴───┴───┴───┴───┴───┴─ X
−2 −1 0
+1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7
Pain level before treatment relative to after treatment
b. The mean difference in pain level is M = 59/20 = 2.95. On average, pain was greater by
an average of 2.95 points before treatment.
c. Yes, the pain level was higher before treatment for nearly all the participants.
28. a. For weekdays M = 0.99 inches and for weekend days is M = 1.67 inches.
b. There does appear to be more rain on weekend days than there is on weekdays.