Solution Manual for Data Mining Chapter 2

Chapter 2 Getting to Know Your Data 2.1 Exercises 1. Give three additional commonly used statistical measures (i.e., not illustrated in this chapter) for the characterization of data dispersion, and discuss how they can be computed efficiently in large databases. Answer: Data dispersion, also known as variance analysis, is the degree to which numeric data tend to spread and can be characterized by such statistical measures as mean deviation, measures of skewness and the coefficient of variation. The mean deviation is defined as the arithmetic mean of the absolute deviations from the means and is calculated as: mean deviation = ∑n i=1 |x − x̄| n (2.1) where, x̄ is the arithmetic mean of the values and n is the total number of values. This value will be greater for distributions with a larger spread. A common measure of skewness is: x̄ − mode s (2.2) which indicates how far (in standard deviations, s) the mean (x̄) is from the mode and whether it is greater or less than the mode. The coefficient of variation is the standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the arithmetic mean and is calculated as: coefficient of variation = s × 100 x̄ (2.3) The variability in groups of observations with widely differing means can be compared using this measure. Note that all of the input values used to calculate these three statistical measures are algebraic measures (Chapter 4). Thus, the value for the entire database can be efficiently calculated by partitioning the database, computing the values for each of the separate partitions, and then merging theses values into an algebraic equation that can be used to calculate the value for the entire database. The measures of dispersion described here were obtained from: Statistical Methods in Research and Production, fourth ed., Edited by Owen L. Davies and Peter L. Goldsmith, Hafner Publishing Company, NY:NY, 1972. 2. Suppose that the data for analysis includes the attribute age. The age values for the data tuples are (in increasing order) 13, 15, 16, 16, 19, 20, 20, 21, 22, 22, 25, 25, 25, 25, 30, 33, 33, 35, 35, 35, 35, 36, 40, 45, 46, 52, 70. (a) What is the mean of the data? What is the median ? (b) What is the mode of the data? Comment on the data’s modality (i.e., bimodal, trimodal, etc.). (c) What is the midrange of the data? (d) Can you find (roughly) the first quartile (Q1) and the third quartile (Q3) of the data? (e) Give the five-number summary of the data. (f) Show a boxplot of the data. (g) How is a quantile-quantile plot different from a quantile plot ? Answer: (a) What is the mean of the data? What is the median? ∑n The (arithmetic) mean of the data is: x̄ = 1n i=1 xi = 809/27 = 30. The median (middle value of the ordered set, as the number of values in the set is odd) of the data is: 25. (b) What is the mode of the data? Comment on the data’s modality (i.e., bimodal, trimodal, etc.). This data set has two values that occur with the same highest frequency and is, therefore, bimodal. The modes (values occurring with the greatest frequency) of the data are 25 and 35. (c) What is the midrange of the data? The midrange (average of the largest and smallest values in the data set) of the data is: (70 + 13)/2 = 41.5 (d) Can you find (roughly) the first quartile (Q1) and the third quartile (Q3) of the data? The first quartile (corresponding to the 25th percentile) of the data is: 20. The third quartile (corresponding to the 75th percentile) of the data is: 35. (e) Give the five-number summary of the data. The five number summary of a distribution consists of the minimum value, first quartile, median value, third quartile, and maximum value. It provides a good summary of the shape of the distribution and for this data is: 13, 20, 25, 35, 70. (f) Show a boxplot of the data. See Figure 2.1. (g) How is a quantile-quantile plot different from a quantile plot? A quantile plot is a graphical method used to show the approximate percentage of values below or equal to the independent variable in a univariate distribution. Thus, it displays quantile information for all the data, where the values measured for the independent variable are plotted against their corresponding quantile. A quantile-quantile plot however, graphs the quantiles of one univariate distribution against the corresponding quantiles of another univariate distribution. Both axes display the range of values measured for their corresponding distribution, and points are plotted that correspond to the quantile values of the two distributions. A line (y = x) can be added to the graph along with points representing where the first, second and third quantiles lie, in order to increase the graph’s informational value. Points that lie above such a line indicate a correspondingly higher value for the distribution plotted on the y-axis, than for the distribution plotted on the x-axis at the same quantile. The opposite effect is true for points lying below this line. 70 60 50 40 Values 30 20 age Figure 2.1: A boxplot of the data in Exercise 2.2. 3. Suppose that the values for a given set of data are grouped into intervals. The intervals and corresponding frequencies are as follows. age 1–5 6–15 16–20 21–50 51–80 81–110 frequency 200 450 300 1500 700 44 Compute an approximate median value for the data. Answer: ∑ L1 = 20, n= 3194, ( f )l = 950, f req median = 1500, width = 30, median = 30.94 years. 4. Suppose a hospital tested the age and body fat data for 18 randomly selected adults with the following result age %fat 23 9.5 23 26.5 27 7.8 27 17.8 39 31.4 41 25.9 47 27.4 49 27.2 50 31.2 age %fat 52 34.6 54 42.5 54 28.8 56 33.4 57 30.2 58 34.1 58 32.9 60 41.2 61 35.7 (a) Calculate the mean, median and standard deviation of age and %fat. (b) Draw the boxplots for age and %fat. (c) Draw a scatter plot and a q-q plot based on these two variables. Answer: (a) Calculate the mean, median and standard deviation of age and %fat. For the variable age the mean is 46.44, the median is 51, and the standard deviation is 12.85. For the variable %fat the mean is 28.78, the median is 30.7, and the standard deviation is 8.99. (b) Draw the boxplots for age and %fat. See Figure 2.2. 60 40 55 35 50 30 Values Values 45 40 25 20 35 15 30 10 25 1 age 1 %fat Figure 2.2: A boxplot of the variables age and %fat in Exercise 2.4. (c) Draw a scatter plot and a q-q plot based on these two variables. See Figure 2.3. qq plot 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 20 25 30 35 40 age scatter plot 45 fat fat 45 45 50 55 60 65 5 20 25 30 35 40 age 45 50 55 60 65 Figure 2.3: A q-q plot and a scatter plot of the variables age and %fat in Exercise 2.4. 5. Briefly outline how to compute the dissimilarity between objects described by the following: (a) Nominal attributes (b) Asymmetric binary attributes (c) Numeric attributes (d) Term-frequency vectors Answer: (a) Nominal attributes A categorical variable is a generalization of the binary variable in that it can take on more than two states. The dissimilarity between two objects i and j can be computed based on the ratio of mismatches: d(i, j) = p−m , p (2.4) where m is the number of matches (i.e., the number of variables for which i and j are in the same state), and p is the total number of variables. Alternatively, we can use a large number of binary variables by creating a new binary variable for each of the M nominal states. For an object with a given state value, the binary variable representing that state is set to 1, while the remaining binary variables are set to 0. (b) Asymmetric binary attributes If all binary variables have the same weight, we have the contingency Table 2.1. object i 1 0 sum object j 1 0 q r s t q+s r+t sum q+r s+t p Table 2.1: A contingency table for binary variables. In computing the dissimilarity between asymmetric binary variables, the number of negative matches, t, is considered unimportant and thus is ignored in the computation, that is, d(i, j) = r+s . q+r+s (2.5) (c) Numeric attributes Use Euclidean distance, Manhattan distance, or supremum distance. Euclidean distance is defined as √ d(i, j) = (xi1 − xj1 )2 + (xi2 − xj2 )2 + · · · + (xin − xjn )2 . (2.6) where i = (xi1 , xi2 , . . . , xin ), and j = (xj1 , xj2 , . . . , xjn ), are two n-dimensional data objects. The Manhattan (or city block) distance, is defined as d(i, j) = |xi1 − xj1 | + |xi2 − xj2 | + · · · + |xin − xjn |. (2.7) The supremum distance is  d(i, j) = lim  h→∞ p ∑ f =1 |xif − xjf |  1h h p = max |xif − xjf |. f (2.8) (d) Term-frequency vectors To measure the distance between complex objects represented by vectors, it is often easier to abandon traditional metric distance computation and introduce a nonmetric similarity function. For example, the similarity between two vectors, x and y, can be defined as a cosine measure, as follows: s(x, y) = xt · y ||x||||y|| (2.9) 1 t where x is a transposition of vector x, ||x|| is the Euclidean norm of vector x, ||y|| is the Euclidean norm of vector y, and s is essentially the cosine of the angle between vectors x and y . 6. Given two objects represented by the tuples (22, 1, 42, 10) and (20, 0, 36, 8): (a) Compute the Euclidean distance between the two objects. (b) Compute the Manhattan distance between the two objects. (c) Compute the Minkowski distance between the two objects, using h = 3. (d) Compute the supremum distance between the two objects. Answer: (a) Compute the Euclidean distance between the two objects. The Euclidean distance is computed using Equation (2.6). √ √ Therefore, we have (22 − 20)2 + (1 − 0)2 + (42 − 36)2 + (10 − 8)2 = 45 = 6.7082. (b) Compute the Manhattan distance between the two objects. The Manhattan distance is computed using Equation (2.7). Therefore, we have |22 − 20| + |1 − 0| + |42 − 36| + |10 − 8| = 11. (c) Compute the Minkowski distance between the two objects, using h = 3. The Minkowski disance is √ d(i, j) = h |xi1 − xj1 |h + |xi2 − xj2 |h + · + |xip − xjp |h (2.10) where h is a real number such that √ h ≥ 1. √ Therefore, with h = 3, we have 3 |22 − 20|3 + |1 − 0|3 + |42 − 36|3 + |10 − 8|3 = 3 233 = 6.1534. (d) Compute the supremum distance between the two objects. The supremum distance is computed using Equation (2.8). Therefore, we have a supremum distance of 6. 7. The median is one of the most important holistic measures in data analysis. Propose several methods for median approximation. Analyze their respective complexity under different parameter settings and decide to what extent the real value can be approximated. Moreover, suggest a heuristic strategy to balance between accuracy and complexity and then apply it to all methods you have given. Answer: This question can be dealt with either theoretically or empirically, but doing some experiments to get the result is perhaps more interesting. We can give students some data sets sampled from different distributions, e.g., uniform, Gaussian (both two are symmetric) and exponential, gamma (both two are skewed). For example, if we use Equation 1 The Euclidean normal of vector x = (x , x , . . . , x ) is defined as 1 2 n the vector. √ x12 + x22 + . . . + x2n . Conceptually, it is the length of (2.11) to do approximation as proposed in the chapter, the most straightforward way is to divide all data into k equal length intervals. median = L1 + ( ∑ N/2 − ( f req )l )width, f reqmedian (2.11) where L1 is the lower boundary of the median interval, N is the number of values in the entire data set, ∑ ( f req)l is the sum of the frequencies of all of the intervals that are lower than the median interval, f reqmedian is the frequency of the median interval, and width is the width of the median interval. Obviously, the error incurred will be decreased as k becomes larger and larger; however, the time used in the whole procedure will also increase. Let’s analyze this kind of relationship more formally. It seems the product of error made and time used is a good optimality measure. From this point, we can do many tests for each type of distributions (so that the result won’t be dominated by randomness) and find the k giving the best trade-off. In practice, this parameter value can be chosen to improve system performance. There are also some other approaches to approximate the median, students can propose them, analyze the best trade-off point, and compare the results among different approaches. A possible way is as following: Hierarchically divide the whole data set into intervals: at first, divide it into k regions, find the region in which the median resides; then secondly, divide this particular region into k subregions, find the sub-region in which the median resides; . . . . We will iteratively doing this, until the width of the sub-region reaches a predefined threshold, and then the median approximation formula as above stated is applied. By doing this, we can confine the median to a smaller area without globally partitioning all data into shorter intervals, which is expensive (the cost is proportional to the number of intervals). 8. It is important to define or select similarity measures in data analysis. However, there is no commonlyaccepted subjective similarity measure. Results can vary depending on the similarity measures used. Nonetheless, seemingly different similarity measures may be equivalent after some transformation. Suppose we have the following two-dimensional data set: x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 A1 1.5 2 1.6 1.2 1.5 A2 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.0 (a) Consider the data as two-dimensional data points. Given a new data point, x = (1.4, 1.6) as a query, rank the database points based on similarity with the query using Euclidean distance, Manhattan distance, supremum distance, and cosine similarity. (b) Normalize the data set to make the norm of each data point equal to 1. Use Euclidean distance on the transformed data to rank the data points. Answer: (a) Use Equation (2.6) to compute the Euclidean distance, Equation (2.7) to compute the Manhattan distance, Equation (2.8) to compute the supremum distance, and Equation (2.9) to compute the cosine similarity between the input data point and each of the data points in the data set. Doing so yields the following table Euclidean dist. Manhattan dist. supremum dist. cosine sim. x1 0.1414 0.2 0.1 0.99999 x2 0.6708 0.9 0.6 0.99575 x3 0.2828 0.4 0.2 0.99997 x4 0.2236 0.3 0.2 0.99903 x5 0.6083 0.7 0.6 0.96536 These values produce the following rankings of the data points based on similarity: Euclidean distance: x1 , x4 , x3 , x5 , x2 Manhattan distance: x1 , x4 , x3 , x5 , x2 Supremum distance: x1 , x4 , x3 , x5 , x2 Cosine similarity: x1 , x3 , x4 , x2 , x5 (b) The normalized query is (0.65850, 0.75258). The normalized data set is given by the following table x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 A1 0.66162 0.72500 0.66436 0.62470 0.83205 A2 0.74984 0.68875 0.74741 0.78087 0.55470 Recomputing the Euclidean distances as before yields x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 Euclidean dist. 0.00415 0.09217 0.00781 0.04409 0.26320 which results in the final ranking of the transformed data points: x1 , x3 , x4 , x2 , x5 2.2 Supplementary Exercises 1. Briefly outline how to compute the dissimilarity between objects described by ratio-scaled variables. Answer: Three methods include: • Treat ratio-scaled variables as interval-scaled variables, so that the Minkowski, Manhattan, or Euclidean distance can be used to compute the dissimilarity. • Apply a logarithmic transformation to a ratio-scaled variable f having value xif for object i by using the formula yif = log(xif ). The yif values can be treated as interval-valued, • Treat xif as continuous ordinal data, and treat their ranks as interval-scaled variables.