Standards Base Assessment - Assignment

Task 3: Analyzing Assessment Data A. 1. Student Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5 Student 6 Student 7 Student 8 Student 9 Student 10 Student 11 Student 12 Student 13 Student 14 Student 15 Student 16 Student 17 Student 18 Student 19 Student 20 3,5 2,5 4,5 3,5 3,5 1,5 5 2,5 5 3,5 4,5 5 2,5 1,2,5 5 1,5 3,5 4,5 3,4 5 Overall Summative Proficiency Score 1.38 2.88 1.63 1.5 2.38 3.13 2.0 2.88 2.75 .88 2.25 2.13 1.88 3.25 1.75 2.25 .63 1.88 2.75 2.63 2. I determined every learner’s overall summative proficiency score by evaluating every learner’s proficiency scores for the assessments taken and found the average score for every student. The average proficiency scores are an expression of the learner’s performance for all the assessments. 3. Five groups were formed from the twenty students in this class. Subgroup 1 had three students with an overall summative proficiency score of 2.88. Subgroup 2 had four students with an overall summative proficiency score of 2.72. Subgroup 3 has six students in it with an overall summative score of 1.59. Subgroup 4 has a total of four students and a summative proficiency score of 2.13. The 5th Subgroup has a total of 19 students and a summative score of 2.11. I have attached a copy of the tables made of each subgroup to calculate these. B. 1. All of the students progressed throughout all eight assessments, the scores on assessment eight were higher than on assessment one. Every student’s overall summative proficiency score was higher than the score on their initial assessment. This means that the data collected shows that all the students made progress while learning this topic, although some students made more progress than others. Only two students individually finished with an overall proficiency score between three and four. Based on this data I can conclude that these two students are good enough to be considered proficient in these measurement topics. Ten students scored between a two and a three and with this data can be considered developing proficiency in this measurement topic. Eight students scored below a 2.0 meaning that these learners are still emerging in knowledge and need more time to learn. As a class, 60% of the learners scored above a 2.0 and are considered developing and proficient. The overall class proficiency average can be rounded to 2.14 which would put their overall score as a developing proficiency in this measurement. 2. Two outliers are Student 10 and Student 17. Both of these students scored below a 1.0 as their final proficiency score. These two together are 7% of the total class. Neither student scored above a 2 and both took until the 8th assessment to score this 2.0. 3. After looking at the data, subgroups 1 and 2 are both very close to reaching proficiency with scores at 2.88 and 2.72 respectively. According to the disaggregated data Subgroups 4 and 5 I can conclude that they are well below the developing proficiency line and need more practice to improve their knowledge. Finally group 3 I can conclude fall below emerging in the measurement topics. The students in this group have the lowest average proficiency score of all the other groups and need significant help on improving their learning in this measurement topic.