Name ______________________________________
In section 11.2 of the text, addition of hydrogen halides to alkenes is discussed. There are two
light blue boxes. One says "Markovnikov's rule" — in 1870, the mechanistic basis for reactivity
was not understood, so applying this rule was the only way to predict the course of the addition
of HX to an alkene. The problem is that the molecules never learned this rule, and today we
know how to think like a molecule, i.e. to predict the course of reactions based on mechanistic
ideas. The other box says "Mechanism-based rule". While the author clearly favors making
predictions based on the mechanism, that point isn't made strongly enough, and having both blue
boxes there almost makes it seem like we can pick whichever "rule" we like best. Baaaah. (Or
as they said in 1870, "balderdash.") That the course of these reactions is governed by
carbocation stability is not a "rule", it's a mechanistic principle.
1 In the reaction of each alkene below with H–X, (a) first draw the one most stable carbocation
intermediate that can be formed by protonation of the π-bond — use what you already know
about carbocations (no "rules" needed) — then (b) draw the product formed by addition of the
nucleophilic halide ion. Include stereochemistry.
H–Br
H–Cl
Ph
2 Same as #1, but take a careful look at the carbocation intermediate — hmmm.... would that
perhaps do something other than just hang out waiting for the nucleophile? (What would
Markovnikov's rule say about this?)
H–I Lecture outline
The most common/useful reactions of alkenes and alkynes are additions to a π-bond.
1. a. Electrophilic addition of H–X (X = Cl, Br, I)
H
C
C
+
HX
X
C
C
This reaction is regiospecific — reaction with an unsymmetrically substituted alkene produces
only one of two possible structural isomers
CH3
H2C
C
CH3
CH3
HBr
H2C
CH3
H
C
Br
CH3
only product
H2C
C
Br
H
CH3
none
(Regiochem is said to follow "Markovnikov's rule")
The reaction mechanism accounts for the observed regiochemistry (and more)
Complete the mechanism by adding the intermediate structures and the curved arrows.
HBr
Br
H
Br
1° cation
3° cation
— the rate-limiting first step is an "electrophilic addition", i.e. addition of an H+. The reaction goes via the most stable carbocation only. Because the transition state for the rate
limiting first step resembles the cation, the pathway to the more stable cation has the lower
activation energy.
sketch rxn
coordinate
diagrams
for the two
competing
rxn pathways
The difference in cation stabilities is about _____ kcal/mol
Therefore the difference in Eas is also about _____ kcal/mol.
This means that the route via the more stable 3° cation is about ______ times as fast as the route
via the less stable 1° cation
A few more examples. Let's include stereochemistry.
HCl
CH3
CH2
CH
H–I
CH2
H–I
HBr b. Acid-catalyzed hydration — addition of "H" and "OH" —
Markovnikov regiochem
OH
H+
H2O
Where's the H
that added? Do
you see that H?
Look carefully!
(or "H 3O+")
mech:
This is just the reverse of the acid-catalyzed dehydration — the principle of
microscopic reversibility demands that the mechanistic pathways be
the same — why must this be true?
With the mechanism in mind, draw the products of these reactions
H2SO4
H2O
H+
H2O
c. Alcohols react just like water. Why is this not surprising? Write the mechanism.
H+
R–OH
O–R 2. Electrophilic addition of halogen ("X+")
a. Halogenation — addition of two halogen atoms
X
C
C
+
X—X
C
C
X
X = Cl, Br
(X ! I !G° > 0)
— this rxn is often carried out in CH2Cl2, CCl4, or another inert (non-reactive) solvent
How does this happen? Let's first think about what we would expect if Br2 were to add to an
alkene the same way HBr does, i.e., via a simple carbocation intermediate...
C
C
Br—Br
C
C
Br
Br
C
Br
C
Br
If this mechanism is correct, (1) what stereochemical outcome would you expect in this case?
Br2
(2) What product would you expect in this case?
Cl2 What really happens?
mechanism:
Br
Br
C
Br
–Br
C
C
Br
C
Br2 is polarized
by !-electrons
C
Br
C
C
C
resonance structures
!+
actual
structure:
Br
!
+
C
C
Bromonium
ion
!+
Because the positive charge is delocalized, bromonium ions are relatively stable and have no
tendency to rearrange.
Bromide ion opens up the bromonium ion by a backside SN2 attack, just like we saw for
protonated epoxides.
frontside attack — verboten!
Br
Br
C
Br
C
C
C
Br
backside SN2 attack
Lecture Outline Nov18
of 6
Report
Tell us what’s wrong with it:
Thanks, got it!
We will moderate it soon!
Free up your schedule!
Our EduBirdie Experts Are Here for You 24/7! Just fill out a form and let us know how we can assist you.
Take 5 seconds to unlock
Enter your email below and get instant access to your document