Acid Base Equilibria Lecture Note

Acid-base equilibria Road map of acid-base equilibria On first encounter, the study of acid-base equilibria is a little like a strange land with seemingly confusing trails that make passage difficult. In fact, there is a road map that, once understood, allows us to navigate acid-base equilibria with confident precision and so become masters of its domain. Here is an overview of this road map. Fundamentally, aqueous acid-base equilibria are just a particular example of the ideas and techniques we have already learned in the study of gas phase chemical equilibria. However, there are two aspects that complicate the application of these ideas. First, because the autoionization of water, 2 H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + OH- HaqL, Kw , is always present in aqueous solution, the analysis of aqueous acid-base equilibria must always take into account at least two competing equilibria, the acid or base ionization and the water autoionization. Second, because we will be interested in how acid-base equilibria respond to changes in the system (typically by adding additional base or acid), we need also to be able to separate the chemical reactions that take place when things are combined from the subsequent equilibration of the reaction product. The key idea is to let what are combined react 100% as a limiting reagent problem as a preliminary step done before equilibration. Our overarching goal, then, is to learn to clearly distinguish and to separately master these two aspects—competing equilibria and limiting reagent reactions. Once this is achieved, we will have a framework in which any problem in aqueous acid-base equilibria can be solved in a straightforward way. The approach we take is to distinguish four regimes: 1. pure acid (or base) solution, 2. acid (or base) that has been partially consumed by addition of base (or acid), 3. acid (or base) that has been exactly consumed by addition of base (or acid), 4. acid (or base) that has been consumed by reaction with excess base (or acid). The details will be different depending on whether the acid (or base) initially present is a weak or strong acid (or base), that is, whether its ionization constant is large or small compared with 1. In all cases, the other component will be a strong base (or acid). The first regime is a straightforward equilibrium problem. The second regime involves reaction of the acid and base as a limiting reagent problem, followed by straightforward equilibration of the resulting solution. The third regime is handled differently depending on whether the acid (or base) initially present is a weak or strong acid (or base). The fourth regime, like the second, involves reaction of the acid and base as a limiting reagent problem, but then equilibration of the products is simple since it will always be the excess base (or acid) that is left after the limiting reagent reaction. You will know that you have mastered this road map of acid-base equilibria when you approach such an equilibrium as a two step process: First (always!), determine which regime applies. Then, implement the calculational procedure for that regime to determine the chemical equilibrium. That really is all there is to it. In this way you can come to find that things will seem simple; not easy, but simple. So, our plan is to learn about each of the four different regimes. We'll do this for each one in turn. Then we'll see how to put everything together, to construct a titration curve—the variation of pH throughout the four regimes. Finally, we'll construct a compact summary of the road map. So let's begin, by defining just what acid-base reactions are and how to characterize them. Acid-base reactions We are going to be working with acid-base equilibria in aqueous solution, and we will use the Brønsted-Lowry definitions that an acid is a source of H+ and a base is an acceptor of H+ . à Acid ionization constant Ka A convenient way to write the reaction of an acid HA in water is HAHaqL + H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + A- HaqL. Here water is acting as a base, accepting the H+ ; the result, H3 O+ , called the conjugate acid of H2 O, since H3 O+ can donate H+ to reform H2 O. In a similar way, A- is called the conjugate base of the acid HA, since A- can accept H+ to reform HA. The equilibrium constant is known as the acid ionization constant Ka , H@H3 O+ D ê 1 ML H@A- Dê1 ML ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , Ka = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ H@HAD ê 1 ML where the reference concentration, 1 M, is written explicitly; liquid water does not appear, because its reference concentration is just the liquid water, so its activity is 1. (Strictly, we are assuming that solutes are sufficiently dilute that the concentration of the water is negligibly affected by their presence.) Usually, we will abbreviate Ka as @H3 O+ D @A- D ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , Ka = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @HAD with the understanding that […] stands for the numerical value—without units—of the concentration in mol/L. As usual, Ka is unit-less. An example acid ionization is CH3 COOHHaqL + H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + CH3 COO- HaqL, @H3 O+ D @CH3 COO- D ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . Ka = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @CH3 COOHD If Ka is much greater than 1, the acid is mostly dissociated and so is said to be a strong acid. If Ka is much less than 1, the acid is dissociated only to a small extent and so is said to be a weak acid. à Base ionization constant Kb Similarly, we can write the reaction of a base B in water as H2 OHlL + BHaqL F HB+ HaqL + OH- HaqL. Here water is acting as an acid, donating the H+ ; the result, OH- , is called the conjugate base of H2 O, since OH- can accept H+ to reform H2 O. Analogously, HB+ is called the conjugate acid of the base B, since HB+ can donate H+ to reform B. The equilibrium constant is known as the base ionization constant Kb , @HB+ D @OH- D Kb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ., @BD where we have used the abbreviated form. Here is an example base ionization, H2 OHlL + NH3 HaqL F NH+4 HaqL + OH- HaqL, @NH+4 D @OH- D ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . Kb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @NH3 D If Kb is much greater than 1, the base reacts nearly completely with water and so is said to be a strong base. If Kb is much less than 1, the base reacts hardly at all with water and so is said to be a weak base. à Water autoionization constant Kw In this analysis of acid and base ionization we see that water in one case plays the role of a base and the other plays the role of an acid. Indeed, the role that water plays in an aqueous equilibrium can be used as another definition of acid or base. A consequence of this dual role of water is that its equilibrium with H3 O+ and OH- is the reference standard against which aqueous acidity and basicity are defined. Here is how this works. A general base ionization reaction is H2 OHlL + BHaqL F HB+ HaqL + OH- HaqL, Kb , and the ionization reaction of its conjugate acid is HB+ HaqL + H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + BHaqL, Ka . The sum of these two reactions is 2 H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + OH- HaqL, Kw . This equation is called the autoionization of water and its equilibrium constant is known as the water autoionization constant Kw . At 25°C it is equal to Kw = @H3 O+ D @OH- D = 1.0 μ 10-14 Now, we have seen that the equilibrium constant of a sum of two reactions is the product of the equilibrium constants of the summed reactions. Therefore, we know that water autoionization constant can be expressed as Kw = Ka Kb . This means we can compute the base ionization constant from the ionization constant of its conjugate acid, Kb = Kw ê Ka = 10-14 ê Ka , where the last equality is for 25°C. It is for this reason that base ionization constants are generally not tabulated. à pH Because Kw is so small, water is ionized only very slightly. We can compute the concentration of H3 O+ and OH- by solving the autoionization equilibrium. initial equilibrium @H3 O+ DêM @OH− DêM 0 x 0 x Initial and equilibrium activities for the autoionization of liquid water. The equilibrium expression is then Kw = 1. μ 10-14 = x2 and so the concentration of H3 O+ and OH- are each 1 μ 10-7 M at 25°C. Now, as we will see in a moment, strong acids can have H3 O+ concentrations of 1 M or more. This means that H3 O+ varies over many powers of 10 (orders of magnitude), and so it is convenient to measure [H3 O+ ] on a logarithmic scale. Also, for weak acids and bases, which is what we will be interested in primarily, concentrations of H3 O+ and OH- are generally much less than 1 M, which means their logarithms are negative, and so it is more convenient to work with the negative logarithms so that we have a positive quantity. For this reason, the notation pAnything is defined as pAnything = -log10 HAnythingL and in particular pH and pOH are defined as pH = -log10 H@H3 O+ D ê 1 ML = -log10 H@H3 O+ DL, pOH = -log10 H@OH- D ê 1 ML = -log10 H@OH- DL, where in each case the second equality is written with understanding that […] stands for the numerical value—without units—of the concentration in mol/L. Show that pure water at 25°C has pH = pOH = 7. To get a feeling for the amounts involved, how many OH- ions are present in 1 liter of pure water at 25°C? How many H2 O molecules are present? The molecules and ions present in water are constantly buffeting one another. On average, how many collisions does a water molecule make before it encounters an hydroxide ion? Since acids produce additional H3 O+ , their pH is always less than 7. Similarly, since bases produce additional OH- , their pOH is always less than 7. We can relate pH and pOH, by calculating pKw . pKw = -log10 HKw L = -log10 H@H3 O+ D @OH- DL = -8log10 H@H3 O+ DL + log10 H@OH- DL< = -log10 H@H3 O+ DL - log10 H@OH- DL = pH + pOH This means that at 25°C pH = 14 - pOH. so that bases have pH greater than 7, at 25°C. Calculate the pH and pOH of the following HCl solutions, assuming the HCl dissociates 100%: 15 M, 10 M, 5 M, 1 M, 0.1 M and 0.01 M. Can pH be less than 0? Calculate the pH and pOH of the following NAOH solutions, assuming the NaOH dissociates 100%: 15 M, 10 M, 5 M, 1 M, 0.1 M and 0.01 M. Can pH be greater than 14? It is important always to be mindful of the temperature being used. The reason is that equilibrium constants in general, and the value of Kw in particular, are different at different temperatures. This means that the pH of pure water will be different at different temperatures. For this reason, saying a solution has pH = 7 does not, by itself, mean the solution is "neutral" (has equal concentrations of H3 O+ and OH- . More generally, the acidic or basic character of a solution is due to the relative concentrations of H3 O+ and OH- , rather than a particular numerical value of pH. Like all equilibrium constants, the autoionization constant of water changes with temperature. At 10°C its value is 0.292 μ 10-14 and at 30°C its value is 1.47 μ 10-14 . Calculate the pH and pOH of water at 10°C and 30°C. Based on your results, does the "acidity" of water depend on temperature? Use the dependence the values of the equilibrium constants in the previous problem to estimate the standard enthalpy change and the standard entropy change of the water autoionization reaction. à Origin of the notation pH Several years ago a student asked where the notation "p" came from. Another student answered that it was from the French word pouvoir (in this sense, capability), referring to the power of ten. I asked a French-speaking colleague about this, and her response was that perhaps it was from the French word puissance (power) instead. Eventually we checked the Oxford English Dictionary, 2e. Here is what it says: "Introduced (in Ger.) as pH, by S. P. L. Sörensen 1909, in Biochem. Zeitschr. XXI. 134, the p repr. G. potenz power and H the hydrogen ion." That is, it is from the German (!) word potenz (power). So, the next question is, can we get a reference tracing an earlier French use? That way we could decide which use takes precedence. Now that we have seen what acid-base reactions are and how to characterize them, let's follow our road map to study these reactions in their four different regimes. Regime 1: pure strong acid (or base) HCl is a strong acid, with Ka = 107 . What is the pH of 10 M HCl? We can begin as usual by setting up the equilibrium. The ionization reaction is HClHaqL + H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + Cl- HaqL. The equilibration analysis is @HClDêM initial equilibrium 10. 10. − 1. x @H3 O+ DêM −7 1. × 10 1. × 10−7 + x @Cl − DêM 0. x Initial and equilibrium activities for the aqueous ionization of 1 M HCl. Now, because Ka is so large, at equilibrium the HCl will be nearly 100% ionized. This means that x is very large. In a case such as this we have learned that it makes sense to use revised initial conditions, starting from 100% ionized acid. @HClDêM initial revised initial equilibrium 10. 0. y @H3 O+ DêM −7 1. × 10 10. 10. − 1. y @Cl − DêM 0. 10. 10. − 1. y Initial, revised initial and equilibrium activities for the aqueous ionization of 1 M HCl. Here we have included the contribution 10-7 M H3 O+ , due to the autoionization of water, but this is negligible compared to the 10 M H3 O+ from the 10 M HCl. The resulting equilibrium expression is H10 - yL2 Ka = 107 = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . y Now, since Ka p 1, most of the HCl is ionized, the change y to achieve equilibrium is small. This means that 10 - y is negligibly different from 10, and so we can approximate the equilibrium constant expression as 102 Ka = 107 º ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . y so that y = 1 μ 10-5 . Confirm this result. Show that the percent of 10. M HCl that is undissociated is 1 μ 10-4 , that is, that 10 M HCl becomes 99.9999 % dissociated. The net result of all of this is that the molarity of H3 O+ is the same as the nominal (that is, ignoring any dissociation) molarity of the HCl. Thus, the pH of 10 M HCl is pH = -log10 H10L = -1 This is a general result for strong acids, so that in such cases we can immediately calculate the pH as -log10 HmolarityL. The pOH is pOH = 14 - pH = 14 - H-1L = 15. This means that at 25°C the concentration of OH- in 10 M HCl is 10-15 M! How many undissociated HCl molecules are present in 1 liter of 10 M HCl at 25°C? How many chloride ions are present? The molecules and ions present in 10 M HCl are constantly buffeting one another. On average, how many collisions does a water molecule make before it encounters an HCl molecule? On average, how many collisions does a chloride ion make before it encounters an hydronium ion? Calculate the pH and pOH of 0.1 M HCl at 25°C. Here is another example. At 25°C a strong acid, HA, has ionization constant Ka = 104 . State whether DG° is greater than zero, zero, or less than zero. Justify your answer. Calculate the concentration of H3 O+ in a 10 M aqueous solution of HA at 25°C. Calculate the pH of a 10 M aqueous solution of HA at 25°C. Calculate the concentration of undissociatedHA in a 10 M aqueous solution of HA at 25°C. Since Ka p 1, this means that if 1 M each of HA, H3 O+ and A- are combined, then spontaneously most of the HA will react with water to form additional H3 O+ and A- . That is, relative to standard states, the acid ionization is spontaneous and so DG° < 0. To answer the other three questions, we need to set up the acid ionization equilibrium. Since Ka p 1, we'll do this by assuming first that all of the acid ionizes. @HADêM initial revised initial equilibrium 10 0 y @H3 O+ DêM −7 1 × 10 10 + 10−7 ≈ 10 10 − y ≈ 10 @A− DêM 0 10 10 − y ≈ 10 This analysis shows that the equilibrium concentration of H3 O+ is 10 M and so the pH is -logH10L = -1. It also shows that the concentration of undissociated HA at equilibrium is the value of y. We get this from the equilibrium constant expression, H10 - yL2 102 102 Ka = 104 = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ º ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ Ø y = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ4ÅÅÅ = 10-2 . y y 10 This means the concentration of undissociated HA is 10-2 M. Regime 1: pure weak acid (or base) We have seen that the hydronium ion concentration in pure water (at 25°C) is 10-7 M. When an acid dissolves in water, it donates additional hydronium ions and so their concentration rises above 10-7 M. Strong acids donate essentially all of their hydrogen to the solution in this way, because they are nearly 100 % dissociated (their Ka is much greater than 1). We showed this explicitly for the example of 10 M HCl. Weak acids, on the other hand, only donate a small portion of their hydrogen ions to the solution. This is because the Ka of a weak acid is much less than 1, and so a weak acid is mostly undissociated. This means that, while the hydronium ion concentration of a weak acid is greater than 10-7 M, it is much less than that of an equivalent amount of strong acid. à Pure weak acid example Here is how to calculate the hydronium ion concentration of a weak acid. As example, let's work with 1.712 M acetic acid, which we'll write simply as HA. The acid ionization is HAHaqL + H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + A- HaqL and Ka = 1.76 μ 10-5 . We begin by assuming that initially no dissociation occurs, so that @HAD = ca = 1.712 M and @A- D = cb = 0. The initial @H3 O+ D = 10-7 , due to the autoionization of water. Because cb is 0, the reaction quotient is Q = 0, which is less than Ka . This means that initially we have too much reactants, not enough products. Therefore, at equilibrium we must decrease the undissociated acid concentration to ca - x, and so increase the conjugate base concentration from 0 to x, and increase the hydronium ion concentration from its value in pure water to 10-7 + x. The amount of dissociation, x, is determined by solving the equilibrium expression H10-7 + xL x H10-7 + xL x Ka = 1.76 μ 10-5 = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . ca - x 1.712 - x We can simplify this equation by making two approximations. First, because Ka is much larger than the autoionization constant of water, Kw , we know that the hydronium ion concentration x contributed by the acid dissociation is greater than 10-7 . This in turn means that x is not negligible compared to 10-7 . We will assume, in fact, that x is so much greater than 10-7 that we can ignore 10-7 relative to x, 10-7 + x º x. Second, because Ka is much less than 1, HA dissociates only to a small extent. This means x is small compared to the initial concentration of the acid, ca . We will assume, in fact, that x is so much smaller than ca that we can ignore x relative to ca , ca - x º ca . Notice that in one case we are neglecting something compared to x, and in the other case we are neglecting x compared to something! With these two approximations, the equilibrium expression becomes x2 H10-7 + xL x Ka = 1.76 μ 10-5 = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , ca ca - x which we can solve by taking the square root to get x= è!!!!!!!!!!! ca Ka . Use the values of Ka and ca to show that x = 5.49 μ 10-3 . This result shows that both of our approximations are justified: 5.49 μ 10-3 is indeed large compared to 10-7 , but 5.49 μ 10-3 is also small compared with 1.712. Always be sure to check to see that this is so. Show that the corresponding pH is 2.260. How many undissociated acetic acid molecules are present in 1 liter of 1.712 M acetic acid at 25°C? How many acetate ions are present? On average, how many collisions does an acetate ion make before it encounters a hydronium ion? Calculate the pH of 0.100 M acetic acid at 25°C. Besure to include the correct number of siginifcant figures in your answer. Compare the ratio of acetate ions to undissociated acetic acid at 25°C that are present in a 1.712 M solution and in a 0.100 M solution. Should the ratios be different? If the ratios differ, could you have predicted which of the ratios would be larger without doing any computations? à Pure weak base example The same kind of analysis works for a weak base. Now the ionization reaction is H2 OHlL + BHaqL F HB+ HaqL + OH- HaqL and the equilibrium expression is xH10-7 + xL Kb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ cb - x Since (we assume) Kb is greater than Kw , the hydroxide concentration, 10-7 + x, is greater than 10-7 , and so x is not negligible compare to 10-7 . As before, we assume that x is in fact so much larger than 10-7 then we can ignore the 10-7 . But also, since (we assume) the base is weak, so that Kb is less than 1, it reacts with water only to a small extent, and so x is small compared to cb . The result is that the equilibrium expression becomes x2 xH10-7 + xL Kb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ º ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ cb cb - x which we can solve by taking the square root to get x= è!!!!!!!!!!! cb Kb . For example, the Kb of NH3 is 1.8 μ 10-5 . We get this value from the Ka of the conjugate acid, NH+4 , which is 5.6 μ 10-10 . Show that Kb = 1.8 μ 10-5 . Show that a 0.112 M solution of NH3 has hydroxide ion molarity x = 1.41 μ 10-3 . As before, this value of x shows that the approximations are justified. Show that the pH is 11.15. Regime 3: Neutralized weak acid (or base): hydrolysis If we know the volume and molarity of a weak acid (or base), we can compute how many moles of the acid (or base) we have. If we add an amount of a strong base (or acid) that has the same number of moles, then we will exactly neutralize the weak acid (or base). The resulting solution will contain the conjugate base of the acid and the conjugate acid of the base. For example, if we neutralize acetic acid with sodium hydroxide, we will end up with a solution of acetate ions (the conjugate base of the acetic acid), water, (the conjugate acid of the hydroxide), and sodium ions—a solution of the salt sodium acetate. The surprising thing is that the pH is such solutions is not 7. Here is why. Because the acid HA is weak, its conjugate base, A- , is much more likely to be found attached to H+ , as HA, than as unattached A- . That is, the equilibrium H2 OHlL + A- HaqL F HAHaqL + OH- HaqL rests heavily on the side of products. A consequence of this attachment process is an increase in the concentration of OH- and so a decrease in the concentration of H3 O+ (since their concentrations are inversely related through the water autoionization equilibrium). The result is that solutions of salts of weak acids are basic. In an analogous way we can see that solutions of salts of weak bases are acidic. The conjugate acid, BH+ , of the weak base, is more likely to exist as the unattached base, B. That is, the equilibrium BH+ HaqL + H2 OHlL V H3 O+ HaqL + BHaqL strongly favors products. This donation of the proton to the water makes the solution acidic. The reaction of the conjugate base (acid) of a weak acid (base) with water is called hydrolysis, because the effect is to break apart water. We can calculate the pH due to the hydrolysis by solving the hydrolysis equilibrium expression. The equilibrium constant is related to the equilibrium constant of the weak acid (base) as Kb = Kw ê Ka HKa = Kw ê Kb L. For example, let's calculate the pH of 1.000 M ammonium chloride, formed by neutralization of ammonia (a weak base) by hydrochloric acid (a strong acid). The Kb of ammonia is 1.8 μ 10-5 , and so the Ka of the conjugate acid NH+4 is 5.6 μ 10-10 . Note that because Kw is so small, usually the hydrolysis equilibrium constant is quite small. Here is the table of initial and equilibrium concentrations. initial equilibrium @NH+ 4 DêM @H3 O+ DêM @NH3 DêM 1. 1. − 1. x 1. × 10−7 1. × 10−7 + x 0. x + Initial and equilibrium activities for the hydrolysis of 1.000 M NH . 4 Now, we can approximate x as large compared to 10-7 , since the resulting solution will be acidic, and we can approximate x as small compared to 1.000, since the equilibrium constant is so small. This leads to x2 Hx + 10-7 L x Ka = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ º ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ca ca - x and so xº è!!!!!!!!!!! ca Ka This evaluates to x = 2.4 μ 10-5 . Calculate the pH of 1.000 M ammonium chloride at 25°C. In a similar way you can calculate that solutions of the salt of a weak acid will be basic. Calculate the pH of a 1.000 M solution of sodium acetate at 25°C. Note that sodium acetate when dissolved in water dissociates into sodium ions and acetate ions, and that acetate is the conjugate base of the weak acid acetic acid. Explain quantitatively why we do not need to worry about hydrolysis of the salts of strong acid neutralized by a strong base. à When hydrolysis is important: Weak can be strong! We have learned that aqueous solutions of salts of weak acids are basic, and that aqueous solutions of salts of weak bases are acidic. The reason these solutions have pH different from that of pure water is because the salts hydrolyze water. The hydrolysis equations are H2 OHlL + A- HaqL F HAHaqL + OH- HaqL, pH > 7 HbasicL BH+ HaqL + H2 OHlL V H3 O+ HaqL + BHaqL. pH < 7 HacidicL The question is, why do such salts hydrolyze water?. The answer, as we have seen, is because HA is preferred over A- , since HA is a weak acid, and because B is preferred over BH+ , since B is a weak base; therefore the equilibrium point of the hydrolysis equations is far to the product (HA and B) side. Now, here is another way to look at these results. Let's consider three different acids, HCl HKa = 107 ), H2 O (viewed as an acid), and a weak acid HA with Ka = 10-5 . The hydrolysis reactions and equilibrium constants of the corresponding conjugate bases are H2 OHlL + Cl- HaqL F HClHaqL + OH- HaqL, Kb = Kw ê 107 = 10-21 , H2 OHlL + H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + OH- HaqL, Kb = Kw = 10-14 , H2 OHlL + A- HaqL F HAHaqL + OH- HaqL, Kb = Kw 10-5 = 10-9 . The first thing to notice is that each of the conjugate bases is quite weak in the absolute sense, that is, in each case Kb ` 1. The second thing to notice, however, in that in a relative sense, the conjugate base of the strong acid is a weaker base than water, Kb HHClL ` Kw , and so a lesser source of OH- , while the conjugate base of the weak acid is a stronger base than water, Kb HA- L p Kw and so a greater source of OH- . This analysis shows that we can ignore hydrolysis by the conjugate base of a strong acid, in the sense that this hydrolysis has negligible effect on OH- concentration compared to the autoionization of water. On the other hand, we cannot ignore hydrolysis by the conjugate base of a weak acid, in the sense that this hydrolysis results in OH- concentration that dwarfs that due to the autoionization of water. Construct the analogous comparison to water of the strength of hydrolysis of the conjugate acids of the strong base NaOH and a weak base B, with Kb = Kw ê 10-5 . Sometimes hydrolysis is explained by saying that the conjugate base, A- , of a weak acid is a strong base. What is meant is strong relative to water, since A- has greater affinity for H+ than does H2 O. Similarly the conjugate acid, BH+ , of a weak base is said to be a strong acid; what is meant is that BH+ has less affinity for H+ than does H2 O. As our analysis shows, however, the conjugate base of a weak acid is not strong in an absolute sense, that is, its Kb is not large compared to 1; however, its Kb is large compared to Kw . Similarly, the conjugate acid of a weak base is not strong in the sense that its Ka is not large compared to 1; but its Ka is large compared to Kw . The key idea is that in hydrolysis, it is the acid or base strength relative to water, not the absolute strength, that matters. Only in this sense do weak acids have strong conjugate bases, and do weak bases have strong conjugate acids. The shift in perspective from absolute to relative acid or base strength is important in other contexts too, for example, in organic chemistry where processes occur in solvents in which no water at all is present. But that is for another course. Regime 2: Partially neutralized weak acid (or base): buffer If we add base to a weak acid, but the moles of base added are not sufficient to consume all of the acid originally present, then after the acid and base have reacted, some unreacted acid will remain. The acid that has been consumed by the added base will have been converted into the conjugate base of the acid. This means that after the reaction between the acid originally present and the base that is added there will be present unreacted weak acid and conjugate base of the weak acid. Such a solution of a weak acid and its salt is known as a buffer because it has the almost magical property that if you add a strong acid or base to it, the pH changes hardly at all! We say the solution buffers the effect of added acid or base. To see how this works, let's say we have a weak acid buffer, say a solution of acetic acid (HA) and sodium acetate (which comes apart in solution into Na+ and A- ). If a strong acid is added, the hydronium ions are consumed by attachment to the conjugate base, H3 O+ HaqL + A- HaqL F HAHaqL + H2 OHlL. Because HA is a weak acid, this equilibrium heavily favors products, as we have seen in our treatment of hydrolysis. If instead a strong base is added, the OH- reacts with the weak acid, HAHaqL + OH- HaqL V H2 OHlL + A- HaqL. Because water is a much weaker acid than HA (or, equivalently, because OH- is a much stronger base—H+ acceptor—than A- ), this equilibrium heavily favors products. The net result is that both added H3 O+ and OH- are consumed by reaction with the buffer, and so the pH changes only by a small amount. à Calculation of buffer action We can see quantitatively how buffers work, by computing the pH of an acetic acid-sodium acetate solution. The acid ionization constant of acetic acid is 1.76 μ 10-5 . The sodium acetate dissociates essentially completely to give acetate ions, the conjugate base of acetic acid. Let's take the total volume of the solution to be 1.000 L and the label concentration (that is, not taking into account any equilibration) of the acetic acid to be ca = 1.000 M, and of its conjugate base to be cb = 1.000 M. Here is the table of initial and equilibrium concentrations of the acid ionization equilibrium. initial equilibrium @HADêM @H3 O+ DêM @A− DêM ca −x + ca 1. × 10−7 1. × 10−7 + x cb x + cb Initial and equilibrium activities for buffer composed of 1.000 M acetic acid and 1.000 M sodium acetate. The chemical equation is HAHaqL + H2 OHlL F H3 O+ HaqL + A- HaqL and so the equilibrium expression is H10-7 + xL Hcb + xL Ka = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . ca - x As usual, we will approximate x as large compared to 10-7 . Since HA is a here a weak acid, it contributes only a small additional amount of conjugate base (acetate ions in this case), and this means x is negligible compared to ca and cb . The equilibrium expression then becomes x cb Ka º ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ca and so the equilibrium hydronium concentration is given by x º Ka ca ê cb . This evaluates to x = 1.76 μ 10-5 . This is indeed small comparted with ca and cb , and is indeed large compare with 10-7 , so our approximations are justified. Calculate the pH of this buffer solution. Answer: 4.754. Calculate the pH for ca = 0.900 M and cb = 1.100 M. Answer: 4.842. à Adding strong acid to a weak-acid buffer Now, let's add 100 mL of 1.000 M HCl to the buffer solution. What will be the pH of the resulting solution? To answer this question we must proceed in two steps. 1. Limiting-reagent stoichiometry: First, let what is added (HCl) react 100%, as a limiting reagent problem, with what it is added to. This will change the concentrations of HA and A- . We need to do this calculation in moles (a limiting reagent problem), and then use the total volume to convert the resulting moles into concentrations (molarities). 2. Re-equilibration: Second, use the changed concentrations of HA and A- to compute the new equilibrium. Step 1: Limiting-reagent stoichiometry We have added 0.100 L × 1.000 M = 0.100 mol HCl. This reacts with the A- to form HA as HClHaqL + A- HaqL Ø HAHaqL + Cl- HaqL. initial final mol 0.1 0 HCl mol 1 0.9 A− mol 1 1.1 HA Initial and final moles for reaction of HCl with a mixture of acetic acid and sodium acetate. Note that the limitng reagent reaction is not written as an equilibrium, since we assume 100% reaction at this stage. This assumption makes sense because HA is a much weaker acid than HCl, or, equivalently, A- is a much stronger base (proton acceptor) than Cl- . In this step we ignore the HA–A- equilibrium. We can do this because we will take into account the equilibration of the HA and A- in the second step. Show that the result is that the concentration of HA and A- are now ca = 1.000 M and cb = 0.818 M. Note that we have taken into account the changed volume resulting from the addition of the HCl solution. It is essential to always do this. Step 2: Re-equilibration The concentrations we have computed as a result of the limiting reagent analysis are initial concentrations as far as the HA-A equilibrium is concerned, since in the limiting-reagent reaction we have ignored the weak acid dissociation equilibrium. We can recalculate the equilibrium concentration of H3 O+ with these new concentrations. Show that the result is x = 2.15 μ 10-5 and that the corresponding pH is 4.667. Compare this to what the pH would be if we added 100 mL of 0.100 M HCl to 1.000 L of pure water. The H3 O+ concentration then would be just the moles of HCl added (since HCl dissociates nearly 100%) divided by the total volume. Show that this H3 O+ concentration is 0.00909 M, and so that the pH would be 2.041. Adding 100 mL of 0.100 M HCl to the 1.000 L of buffer changes the pH from 4.754 to 4.667, whereas dding 100 mL of 0.100 M HCl to 1.000 L of pure water changes the pH from 7 to 2.041. à Adding strong base to a weak-acid buffer Now, let's add 100 mL of 1.000 M NaOH to the buffer solution. What will be the pH of the resulting solution? As before we must proceed in two steps. Step 1: Limiting-reagent stoichiometry We have added 0.100 L × 1.000 M = 0.100 mol NaOH. This reacts with the HA to form A- as HAHaqL + NaOHHaqL Ø H2 OHlL + A- HaqL + Na+ HaqL initial final mol HA 1 0.9 mol NaOH 0.1 0 mol 1 1.1 A− mol 0 0.1 Na+ Initial and final moles for reaction of NaOH with a mixture of acetic acid and sodium acetate. Again, this is not written as an equilibrium, since we assume 100% reaction. Show that the result is that the concentrations of HA and A- are now ca = 0.818 M and cb = 1.000 M. Step 2: Re-equilibration We can recalculate the equilibrium concentration of H3 O+ with these new concentrations. Show that the result is x = 1.44 μ 10-5 and so that the pH is 4.842. Compare this to what the pH would be if we added 100 mL of 0.100 M NaOH to 1.000 L of pure water. The OH- concentration would be just the moles of NaOH added (since NaOH dissociates 100 %) divided by the total volume. Show that the hydroxide ion concentration would be 0.0909 M, and so that the pOH and pH would be 1.041 and 12.959. The buffer pH has changed from 4.754 to 4.842, whereas in the absence of the buffer the pH change would be from 7 to 12.959. à Comparison to unbuffered solution Here is a summary of results compared with pure water. pure water weak−acid buffer pure solution 7 4.754 add strong acid 1.041 4.667 add strong base 12.959 4.842 Effect on pH of added base to 1 L of pure water and to 1 L of a 1.000 M/1.000 M acetic acid/sodium acetate buffer at 25°C. We see that the buffer nearly completely eliminates the effect of added acid and base. à Henderson-Hasselbalch equation We have seen that the equilibrium expression for a weak-acid buffer is H10-7 + xL Hcb + xL Ka = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ca - x We have also seen that we can approximate this expression in two ways. 1. When Ka p Kw , then the H3 O+ from the water autoionization (10-7 ) is negligible compared to that from the acid ionization (x). This means that 10-7 + x is approximately just x. 2. When Ka ` 1 (as it is for a weak acid), then the amount of acid that ionizes (x) is small compared to the acid and conjugate base originally present (ca and cb ). This means that ca - x is approximately ca and cb + x is approximately cb . With these approximations, the equilibrium expression becomes x cb Ka = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ca where x is the (numerical value of) the equilibrium molarity of H3 O+ . Solving for [H3 O+ ], we get @H3 O+ D cb ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = x = Ka ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . M ca Now, we can use this relation to get an expression for pH, by taking the negative logarithm (base 10) of both sides, cb cb -log10 H@H3 O+ D ê ML = -log10 JKa ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ N = -log10 HKa L + log10 J ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ N. ca ca We can rewrite this result compactly as cb pH = pKa + log10 J ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ N. ca This is known as the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, for the pH of a weak-acid buffer. Under what conditions will the pH computed from the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation be correct? Answer: 1 p Ka p Kw . I do not ever use this formula myself, since I always develop the formulas I need as part of the solution to each problem. However, if you are doing many different calculations with buffers, and the necessary conditions hold, then the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation is very useful. Regime 4: Excess base (or acid) If we add base to a weak acid, and the moles of base added are in excess of the acid originally present, then after the acid and base have reacted, all of the acid will have been consumed and some unreacted base will remain. This means that after the reaction between the acid originally present and the base that is added there will be present unreacted strong base and the conjugate base of the weak acid. For example, say we add 1.2 L of 1.000 M sodium hydroxide to 1.0 L of 1.000 M acetic acid. HAHaqL + NaOHHaqL Ø H2 OHlL + A- HaqL + Na+ HaqL initial final mol HA 1 0 mol NaOH 1.2 0.2 mol 0 1 A− mol Na+ 0 1 Initial and final activities for reaction of NaOWith a mixture of acetic acid and sodium acetate. After the reaction what remains is two bases: the unreacted added base, sodium hydroxide, and the conjugate base, acetate, formed in the reaction with the acid. Because the sodium hydroxide is 100% dissociated, its contribution to the OH- concentration is equal to the number of moles of sodium hydroxide, divided by the total volume. Show that the OH- concentration is 0.09 M. Because acetate is a weak base, its contribution to the OH- concentration, through the hydrolysis H2 OHlL + A- HaqL F HAHaqL + OH- HaqL, is much smaller and so can be neglected. Show that the contribution to the OH- concentration due to hydrolysis (in pure water) by the acetate is 1.61 μ 10-5 mol/L, and so indeed negligible compared to the contribution to the OH- concentration due to the unreacted sodium hydroxide. The net result is that when excess strong base is present, there is no need to solve an equilibrium. Rather, the OH- is just the moles of unreacted strong base divided by the total volume. Practice with regimes The key to finding our way in acid-base equilibrium problems is to know what regime applies. This is because once we know the regime, we know which equilibrium expressions to use. For each of the following circumstances, determine which of the four regimes applies and then evaluate the pH. Assume 1 L of each solution are combined. 1 M ammonia and 0.5 M HCl. Answer: 9.25. 1 M sodium acetate and 1 M acetic acid. Answer: 4.76. 1 M sodium acetate and 1 M HCl. Answer: 2.53. 1 M HCl and 1 M acetic acid. Answer 0.301. 1 M HCl , 1 M acetic acid, and 1 M sodium acetate. Answer: 2.47. 1 M sodium hydroxide and 1 M sodium acetate. Answer: 13.70. 1 M HCl and 0.5 M ammonia. Answer: 0.602. 1 M HCl and 1 M ammonia. Answer: 4.78. The way to solve these problems is to, as a first step, let any acids and bases react together 100 % as a limiting reagent problem. It is crucial to do this step completely ignoring all weak acid and weak base equilibria (including hydrolysis). The reason to ignore these equilibria is that, they can be properly treated only as a second step, that is, only once we know which regime we are dealing with. As example, consider a mixture of NaOH and ammonium chloride. Since ammonium, NH+4 (from the dissociation of the ammonium chloride) is a weak acid, we need to consider as a first step the limiting reagent reaction NH+4 HaqL + NaOHHaqL V H2 OHlL + NH3 HaqL + Na+ HaqL There are three possibilities. If there are more moles of NH+4 than of NaOH, then after the reaction we have a combination of unreacted NH+4 and some NH3 , that is, a weak base and its conjugate acid (regime 2). If there are equal moles of NH+4 and of NaOH, then after the reaction all of the NH+4 and NaOH are consumed and we have just pure weak base, NH3 (regime 1). Finally, if there are more moles of NaOH than of NH+4 , then not all of the NaOH is consumed and so we have an excess strong base problem (regime 4). Putting it all together: titration In titration of acids and bases we measure the change in pH as we add base (or acid) of a known concentration to a given volume of an acid (or base) of known concentration. Neutralization occurs at the equivalence point, when the moles of base (or acid) added exactly equals the moles of acid (or base) originally present. There are four regimes that need to be treated differently: 1. The pH of the original acid (or base). 2. The pH when the acid (or base) has been only partial neutralized. 3. The pH at the equivalence point. 4. The pH when excess base (or acid) has been added, that is, after the equivalence point. In computing the pH for different points in regimes 2, 3 and 4 it is important to always carry out the limiting reagent part of the analysis starting with the original amounts present, rather than the amounts determined at the previous titration point. There are two reasons to do this. First, the limiting reagent step can be done all at once rather than having to adjust its results by taking into account concentrations from a previous step. Second, in this way we avoid accumulation of small errors due to approximations made in calculating the concentrations at previous steps. à Strong acid/strong base titration Here is how to calculate pH in the different regimes of titration of a strong acid with a strong base. Let's titrate 100.0 mL of 0.100 M HCl with 0.120 M NaOH. The equivalence point is when moles of acid = Ma Va = moles of base = Mb Vb The equivalence volume, the volume of base needed to just react with all of the acid originally present is therefore given by Ma Vequivalence = Va ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . Mb Show that for our case this evaluates to 83.3 mL Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved Chapter 8, Acid-base equilibria 223 When this volume of base has been added, the acid will have been exactly neutralized. If less than this volume of base is added, the solution will contain unreacted acid. If more than this volume of base is added the solution will contain excess base. Regime 1: pH of pure acid Because HCl is a strong acid, it is essentially 100% dissociated, and so its pH is just the negative logarithm of (the numerical value of) its molarity, pH ã -logH0.100L = 1.000. Regime 2: pH of partially neutralized acid Since the equivalence point occurs when 83.3 mL of base is added, if only 40.0 mL (say) of base is added, then the acid will only be partially neutralized. We need to treat the partial neutralization as a limiting reagent problem, using moles (not molarity). initial final mol HCl 0.01 0.0052 mol NaOH 0.0048 0 − mol Cl 0 0.0048 mol Na+ 0 0.0048 Initial and final moles for reaction of 40.00 mL of 0.120 M NaOH with 100.0 mL of 0.100 M HCl. Verify that the values given in this table are correct. What would the values be if instead 50 mL of 0.120 M NaOH had been added? Since we have added less than the equivalence volume of base, unreacted acid remains. Show that the concentration of the unreacted acid is now 0.037 M. This molarity is less than the original acid molarity because the volume of the solution has increased. Once we know the molarity of the unreacted acid we can compute the new pH. Show that the new pH is 1.430. Regime 3: pH of exactly neutralized acid When 83.3 mL of NaOH is added, the HCl will have been completely converted to water and NaCl. Since neither Na+ nor Cl- hydrolyzes water (because NaOH is a strong base and HCl is a strong acid), the pH at the equivalence point is 7. Regime 4: pH of excess base What will the pH be if we add more that the equivalence volume of base, say 100.0 mL? We are adding 0.1000 L × 0.120 M = 0.0120 moles of NaOH. Again, we need to treat the reaction of the base and acid as a limiting reagent problem, using moles (not molarity). initial final mol HCl 0.01 0 mol NaOH 0.012 0.002 − mol Cl 0 0.01 mol Na+ 0 0.01 Initial and final moles for reaction of 100.00 mL of 0.120 M NaOH with 100.0 mL of 0.100 M HCl. Now the acid is the limiting reagent; not all of the base has reacted; some is left over. Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved 224 Notes on General Chemistry, 2e Show that the concentration of the unreacted base is 0.010 M. To determine the pH, we first compute the pOH of the excess base, using its molarity since it is 100% dissociated, and then use this to calculate the pH. Show in this way that the pH is 12.000. Calculation of titration curve Here is a Mathematica function to calculate the pH during the titration of volume Va of a strong acid of molarity Ma by a strong base of molarity Mb . pHstrong@Ma_, Va_, Mb_, Vb_D := BlockA9 Kw = 10 ^ −14, Ma Vequiv = Va Mb =, −LogA10, WhichA Vb ê L E E 0 H∗ pure weak acid ∗L, , mol ê L i Va Ma − Vb Mb z y L , Vb ê L < Vequiv ê LH∗ buffer ∗L, j j z Va + Vb k { mol è!!!!!!!!! Vb ê L Vequiv ê L H∗ hydrolysis ∗L, Kw , Va + Vb mol Vb ê L > Vequiv ê L H∗ excess base ∗L, Kw Vb Mb − Va Ma L Ma E This function calculates the pH using [H3 O+ ] calculated appropriately depending on whether the added base volume corresponds to regime 1 HVb = 0), 2 H0 < Vb < Vequiv ), 3 HVb = Vequiv L or 4 HVb > Vequiv L. The expression for [H3 O+ ] for regime 4, Vb > Vequiv , is written compactly using @OH- D i Kw mol ê L zy pH = 14 - pOH = -log10 HKw L + log10 J ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ N = -log10 jj ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ - ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ z. mol ê L k @OH D { The Mathematica function calculates the H3 O+ activity (numerical value of its molarity) beyond the equivalence point, Vb = Vequiv , using the formula Kw Hmol ê LL HVa + Vb L ê HVb Mb - Va Ma L. Derive this formula. Here are the values Ka , Ma , Va and Vb , Ma = 0.100 mol ê L; Va = 0.100 L; Mb = 0.120 mol ê L; Show that the equivalence volume is 83.3 mL. Here are the corresponding pH values for the various volumes of base added. Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved Chapter 8, Acid-base equilibria mL 0.000 15.000 30.000 45.000 60.000 75.000 83.333 90.000 105.000 225 pH 1.000 1.147 1.308 1.499 1.757 2.243 7.000 11.624 12.103 pH of 100.0 mL of 0.100 M HCl HKa = 1 μ 107 ) versus mL of added 0.120 M NaOH. Here is a graph of pH versus the total volume of base added. pH 12 10 8 6 4 2 20 40 60 80 100 Vb HmLL Titration of 100.0 mL of 0.100 M HCl HKa = 1 μ 107 ) with 0.120 M NaOH. pH is plotted versus mL of base added. The points mark the pH values for the specific volumes. à Weak acid/strong base titration Here is how to calculate pH in the different regimes of titration of a weak acid with a strong base. Titrate 100.0 mL of 0.100 M acetic acid (Ka = 1.76 μ 10-5 ) with 0.120 M NaOH. Do this by calculating the pH for 0, 15.0, 45.0, 60.0, 75.0, 90.0, 105 and 120 mL of NaOH added. Also calculate the equivalence volume and the pH at the equivalence point. If you can, plot your results as pH versus mL of base added. Here are some hints for solving this problem. è For no volume added, we have a pure weak acid problem. è For volumes of base less than the equivalence volume, we have to do buffer calculations. è At the equivalence point, we have a hydrolysis problem. è For volumes beyond the equivalence point, we have just a strong base problem. Let's summarize how to treat each of these cases. Equivalence volume The equivalence volume is the volume of base that contains the same number of moles of base as there are moles of acid originally present. Since mol acid = Va Ma = mol base = Vequiv Mb Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved 226 Notes on General Chemistry, 2e the equivalence volume is given by Ma Vequiv = Va ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ Mb Pure weak acid The equilibrium expression for a pure weak acid of concentration Ma is x2 Ka = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , Ma @H3 O+ D è!!!!!!!!!!!!! ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = Ma Ka . x = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ mol ê L Here we have approximated x as large compared with 10-7 and small compared with Ma . Partial neutralization of weak acid by strong base If volume Vb of a strong base of concentration Mb is added to volume Va of a weak acid of concentration Ma , Vb Mb moles of base will react with the acid. The result will be the conversion of Vb Mb moles of acid into and equal number of moles of conjugate base, and Va Ma - Vb Mb moles of acid will remain, Therefore, the concentration of the acid is reduced from Ma to Va Ma - Vb Mb ca = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ Va + Vb and the concentration of conjugate base—originally zero—is now Vb Mb cb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ Va + Vb These are the starting concentrations that we use to determine the final equilibrium between the weak acid and its conjugate base, using the equilibrium expression. cb Ka = x ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , ca @H3 O+ D ca Va Ma - Vb Mb ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = Ka ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = Ka ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . x = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ mol ê L cb Va Mb Here we have approximated x as large compared with 10-7 and small compared with both ca and cb . Notice that in the ratio of concentrations, ca ê cb , the total volume divides out. Exact neutralization of weak acid by strong base When there is exact neutralization, then all of the strong base is exactly consumed and all of the weak acid is converted to its conjugate base. The concentration of the conjugate base produced is Va Ma cb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . Va + Vb The equilibrium concentration x of OH- satisfies Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved Chapter 8, Acid-base equilibria 227 Kw x2 Kb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , Ka cb @OH- D è!!!!!!!!!!! è!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! x = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = cb Kb = cb Kw ê Ka . mol ê L Here we have approximated x as large compared with 10-7 and small compared with cb . Excess strong base When excess base is added, then all of the acid is converted to Va Ma moles of conjugate base, and Vb Mb - Va Ma moles of base remain. We can ignore the OH- produced by hydrolysis of the conjugate base, since it is much smaller that the OH- due to the excess base; the concentration OHis just the concentration of the excess base is Vb Mb - Va Ma ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @OH- D = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ Va + Vb We ignore the contribution to the OH- concentration due to the hydrolysis of water by the conjugate base of the weak acid. Why is this justified? Calculation of pH Here is a Mathematica function to calculate the pH during the titration of volume Va of a weak acid of molarity Ma and ionization constant Ka by a strong base of molarity Mb . pHweak@Ka_, Ma_, Va_, Mb_, Vb_D := BlockA9 Kw = 10−14 , Vequiv = Va =, Ma Mb −LogA10, WhichA Vb ê L Ma %%%%%%%%% Ka , 0 H∗ pure weak acid ∗L, $%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% mol ê L Vb ê L < Vequiv ê LH∗ buffer ∗L, Ka Va Ma − Vb Mb Vb Mb , Va + Vb %%%%%%%% mol%%%% Vequiv ê L H∗ hydrolysis ∗L, $%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Ka Kw , Va Ma L Va + Vb mol Vb ê L > Vequiv ê L H∗ excess base ∗L, Kw Vb Mb − Va Ma L Vb ê L E E E This function calculates the pH using [H3 O+ ] calculated appropriately depending on whether the added base volume corresponds to regime 1 HVb = 0), 2 H0 < Vb < Vequiv ), 3 HVb = Vequiv L or 4 HVb > Vequiv L. The expressions for [H3 O+ ] for regime 3, V = Vequiv , and regime 4, Vb > Vequiv , are written compactly using @OH- D i Kw mol ê L zy pH = 14 - pOH = -log10 HKw L + log10 J ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ N = -log10 jj ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ - ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ z. mol ê L k @OH D { Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved 228 Notes on General Chemistry, 2e The Mathematica function calculates the H3 O+ activity (numerical value of its molality) at the equivalence point, Vb = Vequiv , using the formula è!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ka Kw Hmol ê LL HVa + Vb L ê HVa Ma L . Derive this formula. Results Here are the values Ka , Ma , Va and Vb for the study problem. Ka = 1.76 × 10−5 ; Ma = 0.100 mol ê L; Va = 0.100 L; Mb = 0.120 mol ê L; Show that the equivalence volume is 83.3 mL. Here are the corresponding pH values for the various volumes of base added. mL 0.000 15.000 30.000 45.000 60.000 75.000 83.333 90.000 105.000 pH 2.877 4.096 4.505 4.824 5.165 5.709 8.746 11.624 12.103 pH of 100.0 mL of 0.100 M acetic acid HKa = 1.76 μ 10-5 ) versus mL of added 0.120 M NaOH. Here is a graph of pH versus the total volume of base added. pH 12 10 8 6 4 20 40 60 80 100 Vb HmLL Titration of 100.0 mL of 0.100 M acetic acid HKa = 1.76 μ 10-5 ) with 0.120 M NaOH. pH is plotted versus mL of base added. The points are mark the pH values for the specific volumes. à Strong acid–strong base versus weak acid–strong base titration Here is a comparison of the titration curves for 100.0 mL of 0.100 M HCl and for 100.0 mL of 0.100 M acetic acid with 0.120 M NaOH. Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved Chapter 8, Acid-base equilibria 229 pH 12 10 8 6 4 2 20 40 60 80 100 Vb HmLL Titration of 100.0 mL of 0.100 M acetic acid HKa = 1.76 μ 10-5 , upper curve) and titration of 100.0 mL of 0.100 M HCl HKa = 1 μ 107 , lower curve) with 0.120 M NaOH. pH is plotted versus mL of base added. How do the two curves compare for small amounts of added base? How do the two curves compare for amounts of added base near one-half the equivalence volume? Why are the two curves the same for amounts of added base greater than the equivalence volume? What is the total pH change as the total volume of base added changes from 15 mL to 75 mL for each of the curves? Based on your result, which curve is more effective at maintaining pH within a narrow range? Are you surprised by your result? Is there a circumstance in which a strong acid could act as a good buffer? Sketch on the plot the weak acid curve for Ka increased by a factor of 101.5 and Ka decreased by the same factor. à Limiting-reagent calculations in titrations: Study problems We have seen that the calculation of strong-acid/strong-base titration involves only the stoichiometry of the acid-base reaction. Titrations involving weak acids or weak bases involve, as we have seen, in addition the calculation of the re-equilibration using the new concentrations resulting from the limiting-reagent stoichiometry calculations. Here are two problems that illustrate the crucial importance of first letting what is added react with what is already present as a limiting-reagent problem. Add strong base to a weak acid to give a particular pH The problem is to determine the volume x of Mb = 0.0500 M NaOH to add to Va = 500 mL of Ma = 0.100 M formic acid (Ka = 1.77 μ 10-4 ) to make the pH of the combined solution 3.00. The limiting-reagent reaction in this case is the reaction of the OH- (from the NaOH) with the formic acid (which we write as HA), to give the conjugate base (A- ) of the formic acid, HAHaqL + OH- HaqL Ø H2 OHlL + A- HaqL. Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved 230 Notes on General Chemistry, 2e Because this reaction is assumed to proceed 100%, we do not use a double arrow. The number of moles of A- formed in this way is x Mb , the number of moles of weak acid remaining is Va Ma - x Mb , and so the concentrations are Va Ma - x Mb ca = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , Va + x x Mb cb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . Va + x We use these concentration to do the second step of the problem, namely to determine the equilibrium HAHaqL + H2 OHlL V H3 O+ HaqL + A- HaqL cb Ka = @H3 O+ D ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ca where we approximate the additional ionization y of the acid as small compared to ca and cb . We do not need to make any approximate to [H3 O+ ] = 10-7 + y, because we know from the pH that [H3 O+ ] = 10-3.00 . The equilibrium relation becomes x Mb Ka = 10-pH ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ Va Ma - x Mb which we can solve for the unknown volume x. Show that x = 150 mL. Add strong acid to a weak-acid salt to give a particular pH In this problem we need to find the volume x of Ma = 0.100 M HCl to add to Vb = 400 mL of Mb = 0.0800 M NaCN, so that the pH of the combined solution is 9.58. The limiting-reagent reaction here is HClHaqL + CN- HaqL Ø HCNHaqL + Cl- HaqL and with itwe can determine the initial molarity ca of the HCN (Ka = 4.93 μ 10-10 ) and cb of the CN- , in terms of the unknown volume x Vb Mb - x Ma cb = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , Vb + Va x Ma ca = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . Vb + Va Then we can set up the equilibrium HCNHaqL + H2 OHlL V H3 O+ HaqL + CN- HaqL, use [H3 O+ ] = 10-pH = 10-9.58 and then solve its equilibrium expression for the volume x. The expression is Copyright © 2006 Dan Dill (dan@bu.edu). All rights reserved Chapter 8, Acid-base equilibria 231 Vb Mb - x Ma Ka = 10-pH ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ . x Ma Show that x = 111 mL. à Titration recipes I have collected into a document the various results needed to calculate aqueous acid-base titrations. It is on the Web at http://quantum.bu.edu/notes/GeneralChemistry/titration-recipes.pdf I hope the recipes are helpful. Polyprotic acids Acids such as H2 SO4 and H2 CO3 are called polyprotic acids, because they are able to donate more than one proton in successive ionization equilibria. For example, carbonic acid ionization proceeds as H2 CO3 HaqL + H2 OHlL V H3 O+ + HCO-3 HaqL, Ka1 , and HCO-3 HaqL + H2 OHlL V H3 O+ + CO23 HaqL, Ka2 . Generally, exact calculation of the equilibrium concentration of the acid, and its successively produced conjugate bases is complicated, since each of the ionization equilibria need to be accounted for simultaneously. However, for weak polyprotic acids the first ionization constant is much less than 1, and the second ionization constant is tiny compared with the first. For example, for carbonic acid the ionization constants are Ka1 = 4.3 μ 10-7 , Ka2 = 4.8 μ 10-11 . For such cases, we can treat the first ionization equilibrium as a weak acid with the result that, to a very good approximation, @H2 AD = ca and @H3 O+ D = @HA- D = è!!!!!!!!!!!!! ca Ka1 . Because the second ionization constant is so much smaller than the first, the second ionization does not change appreciably either the concentration of H3 O+ or HA- . That is, the values of these concentrations from the first ionization are used as the equilibrium values in the second ionization. The result is that @A2- D = Ka2 . Show that this expression is correct if Ka1 p Ka2 . For example, for a 0.100 M solution of carbonic acid, we have @H2 AD = ca = 0.100 M, @H3 O+ D = @HA- D = è!!!!!!!!!!!!! ca Ka1 . -11 . Show that @H3 O+ D = @HA- D = 2.1 μ 10-4 and that @CO23 D = 4.8 μ 10 A neat consequence of this treatment of weak polyprotic acids is that it is simple to see how the concentration of the acid and its ionization products depends on pH. The first step is to rearrange the law of mass action for each ionization, as Ka1 @HA- D ÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @H3 O+ D @H2 AD and Ka2 @A2- D ÅÅÅÅ . ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅ = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @H3 O+ D @HA- D Next, we can define the fractional concentrations @H2 AD ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , f0 = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @H2 AD + @HA- D + @A2- D @HA- D ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , f1 = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @H2 AD + @HA- D + @A2- D and @A2- D f3 = ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ , @H2 AD + @HA- D + @A2- D Then, we can use the equilibrium expressions for the successive ionization to relate fractional concentrations to one another as Ka1 Ka1 pH ÅÅÅÅ = f0 ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ f1 = f0 ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ +ÅÅÅÅÅÅ = f0 Ka1 10 + log10 IAH3 O DL @H3 O D 10 and Ka2 ÅÅÅÅ = f1 Ka2 10pH . f2 = f1 ÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅÅ @H3 O+ D Show that these two relations are correct, by using the expressions for f0 , f1 and f2 . But also we know that the sum of the fractional concentrations is 1, f0 + f1 + f2 = 1 Show that this expression is correct. This means we have three equations for the three fractional concentrations, in terms of the acid ionization constants and the pH. Solve the three equations by hand to show that, at pH=7, the fractional concentrations are f1 = 0.19, f2 = 0.81 and f3 = 0.00039. That is, the solution is 19% undissociated acid, 81% first ionization product, and 0.039% second ionization product. At pH = 11 the fractional concentrations are are f1 = 4. μ 10-6 , f2 = 0.17 and f3 = 0.83; the distribution has changed completely, to 0.00040% undissociated acid, 17% first ionization product, and 83% second ionization product. Here is how the distribution changes over the range of pH from 0 to 14. pH 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 f0 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0.96 0.7 0.19 0.023 0.0022 0.00016 4. × 10−6 4.7 × 10−8 4.8 × 10−10 4.8 × 10−12 Fractional amounts of H 2 f1 4.3 × 10−7 4.3 × 10−6 0.000043 0.00043 0.0043 0.041 0.3 0.81 0.97 0.95 0.68 0.17 0.02 0.0021 0.00021 f2 2.1 × 10−17 2.1 × 10−15 2.1 × 10−13 2.1 × 10−11 2.1 × 10−9 2. × 10−7 0.000014 0.00039 0.0047 0.046 0.32 0.83 0.98 1. 1. CO3 , HCO-3 and CO2versus pH at 25°C. 3 and here is a graphical display of the changing fractional concentrations. fi 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 pH 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2Fractional amounts of H CO (curve falls at high pH), HCO (curve peaks at middle pH values) and CO 2 3 3 3 (curve rises at high pH) versus pH at 25°C. In solutions of just the polyprotic acid, the pH is fixed by the equilibrium equations. However, in the presence of buffers, the pH can be held at essentially arbitrary values. In this way the various fractions can be tuned to any desired values. Many biochemical processes depend on the acid fractions being particular values and buffer systems are adapted to maintain these values.