”Ban The Box” Business Legislation Essay

1 RUNNING HEAD;” BAN THE BOX” BUSINESS LEGISLATION ESSAY ”BAN THE BOX” BUSINESS LEGISLATION ESSAY Student Name School Name Course Moral imagination is one of the ethical principles that can aid in placing the "ban the box" law in its proper context. Werhane & Moriarty (2009) assert that the moral imagination principle necessitates the capacity to comprehend another person's predicament from a variety of angles. Managers are more equipped to develop a range of possibilities when using moral imagination to try to resolve a problem or make a commercial decision. Notably, if managers approach a problem through the organizational framework lens, such solutions would not be immediately apparent to them. Managers would need moral imagination to identify and consider the choices before ultimately putting them into practice. If "ban the box" legislation were to pass, managers would not be required to. The "ban the box" law would be the best solution to the ex-offenders high jobless rate. Moral imagination, Kantian justifications, and utilitarian justifications as ethical principles all play a significant role in the legislation's support. Therefore, the law ought to be enacted by all national, local, and international governments. This is because being a convicted felon should not eliminate a person's ability to get employment. Considering such individuals for employment would be advantageous for both them and society as a whole by preventing them from resuming their illegal behavior. 2 RUNNING HEAD;” BAN THE BOX” BUSINESS LEGISLATION ESSAY Moral imagination, however, would oblige the managers to take into account the applicants based on criteria other than their prior criminal activity (Werhane & Moriarty, 2009). For instance, it would be crucial to take into account the applicant's right to employment based on their credentials. It would also be crucial to take into account the likelihood that selecting a candidate would result in their total transformation from their criminal background. A company would also miss the opportunity to hire a worker who would have been a top performer and a valuable asset if it fired someone due to their criminal record. An employer would take into account an ex-convict for employment if all these scenarios and factors were taken into account, as opposed to when the employer merely gives. The “ban the box” legislation can also be contextualized in terms of Kantian arguments. Bowie (2005) stipulates that at times, people would do something to get another thing. People would, for instance, need to work to make a living. According to Kant, these obligations are depending on circumstances and are referred to as hypothetical imperatives. Bowie (2005) also makes the point that some obligations are not dependent on "buts" or "ifs." Such obligations are categorical imperatives, in Kant's view. Furthermore, according to Kant, the categorical imperative is founded on reason. Here are three different ways that Kant has argued against the categorical imperative: People should always respect one another as a goal in themselves and not just as a means to an end. Additionally, people's behavior should reflect their membership in an ideal kingdom where they are. These arguments relate to "ban the box" legislation in the sense that employers ought to treat ex-offenders in the same manner in which they would like to be treated. The inmates should be considered goals rather than just a means to corporate success. 3 RUNNING HEAD;” BAN THE BOX” BUSINESS LEGISLATION ESSAY They ought to be handled with the highest moral decency necessary. In this regard, ex-offenders shouldn't be rejected from jobs based only on their criminal history. As Justice Potter Stewart famously said, "There is a big difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do" (Chaudhary & Soni, 2013). The viewpoint holds that a person should always do what is right, even if their moral intuition tells them otherwise. They shouldn't compromise their morals and act unethically. A formal structure would grant the manager the authority to reject a candidate for a job based on their criminal history. However, the "ban the box" proposal states that this would not be the proper course of action. As much as a company would claim that hiring someone with a criminal record would damage its reputation, the allegation would be difficult to support and establish. Giving qualified ex-offenders a chance to work for the organization and keeping an eye on them as they do their organizational obligations would only be right. This is especially true given that prisoners typically serve their sentences to change from the illegal behaviors and traits they had in the past (Pettus, 2013). Therefore, it would be appropriate for employers to think that they have changed and to provide them with an equal number of work opportunities.