Field Study Evaluation Assignment

FIELD STUDY EVALUATION ASSIGNMENT QUESTION 1. Describe the 3 most potential tourist attractions at your study location.Jawab : Natural Potential: 1. Mountain: The White Crater was formed as a result of the eruption of Mount Patuha, so the White Crater is surrounded by mountains which add to the impression of beautiful natural scenery. 2. Cantigi Plant Forest: Along the road to the crater there are forests with plants that can grow on mountain peaks, namely cantigi, where the trees tower high and can add a shady impression to the crater area.. 3. Crater: A natural lake resulting from the eruption of Mount Patuha with a relatively high sulfur content, forming an attractive white lake due to the sulfur mixing with the soil and producing green water. 2. What is the potential attraction analysis method used, and briefly explain the analysis principle! Answer: Analysis of the potential of tourist attractions used in the Kawah Putih area is by using the Scoring method with indicators from Leopold (1985) where the assessment is done by giving a score to each indicator and each type of attraction in the Kawah Putih Tour. The assessment aspects are in accordance with the descriptions A, B, C, D, E, namely the diversity of attractions, the diversity of natural formations, the level of popularity, accessibility and uniqueness of the attraction. Each aspect is given a number value from 1 to 5, namely very unattractive, unattractive, somewhat attractive, attractive, and very attractive. 3. Describe the 2 landscape hazards that are most at risk in your study location! Answer : 1. The danger based on environmental aspects is forest fires because the plants around the crater are flammable. For example, cantigi trees and andam alang-alang ferns. 2. The danger based on the geological aspect is because the White Crater is located in the Mount Patuha area which is an active volcanic mountain, therefore the geological aspect is a threat to the White Crater tourist area. 4. In relation to no 3, what basis do you use in deciding which landscape hazards are most at risk in your study location? Answer : 1. There have been similar incidents in the past that resulted in fatalities due to human negligence. 2. The location of the tourist area is on the slopes of an active volcano. 5. Explain the percentage area of each land suitability category resulting from the land suitability analysis at your study location! Answer : - Seasonal Plant Area : Class 2 (199,95 ha) - Annual Plant Area : kelas 2 ( 225,87 ha) - Buffer Zone : Class 3 (500,5 ha) dan kelas 4 (215,26 ha) - Protected Function Area : Class 4 (15,80 ha) 6. Related to no. 5, also explain which land category has the largest area, and what are the implications of these results for tourism development at the study location? Answer: Buffer zone. In this area there is land that allows for economic cultivation and does not cause ecological losses. In addition, the buffer zone functions as a boundary between protected areas and cultivation areas such as production forests 7. Explain what components you use in conducting tourism carrying capacity analysis at the study location! And also explain the principle of the carrying capacity analysis formula that you use in the study! Answer: In the analysis of tourism carrying capacity, the effective area of space used for tourism activities for 1 year, turnover factor, constants and demand for tourism activities per year must be considered. This aims to determine whether the carrying capacity has exceeded the calculation of the effective area for tourism obtained from the results of the land suitability analysis. 8. What are the results of the carrying capacity analysis that you obtained at the study location? Explain! Answer : Known: - AR (large area for tourism) = 345,82 ha - A (area requirements per tourist) = 2.725 feet2 - Cd (number of effective days in 1 year) = 365 hari - TF (turn over factor) = 1,5 - Constants = 43.560 Question : D (demand for tourism activities (Man/Year)) = ? Answer : Data on tourist activity demand at the White Crater destination is 3,026,604 tourists each year. 9. Explain the difference between the Carrying Capacity study using the Douglas (2000) formula and Chifuentes (1992) formula! Answer: The study according to Cifuentes (1992) consists of physical carrying capacity, ecological carrying capacity, and real carrying capacity. While Douglas' formula requires a minimum area requirement for tourism activities, an average number of visitors per year, a specific tourism area requirement (907 Feet2), daily usage capacity (within 1 year), Recovery factor and Constant. 10. Describe the level of disaster risk at your study location based on the Hazard, Vulnerability & Capacity components! Answer : ● Hazard : 1. The danger based on environmental aspects is forest fires because plants around the crater are flammable. For example, cantigi trees and andam alang-alang ferns. 2. The danger based on the geological aspect is because the White Crater is located in the Mount Patuha area which is an active volcanic mountain, therefore the geological aspect is a threat to the White Crater tourist area. ● Vulnerability : 1. Natural factors: The existence of a prolonged dry season which results in forest fires. 2. Social factors: Apart from natural factors, there are also human accidents when people in the White Crater area burn incense while on pilgrimage. ● Capacity : In terms of disaster management that occurs in the White Crater, the management is assisted by the local government and local community for the postdisaster recovery process. 11. Explain the disaster mitigation concept that you propose at the study location! Answer: Efforts to minimize disasters are carried out through the development of physical infrastructure and the use of technology. Such as the creation of volcanic activity detection devices, early warning systems to predict volcanic activity..