24.910, Spring 2009 (Stephenson)
SOLUTIONS: Assignment for Week 3 (Feb. 24)
[From Heim & Kratzer] Exercise 2 parts e-h (pp. 39-40)
[Note: I’ve put some items in bold to bring attention to the parts of the expression that
are relevant at each step. You don’t have to do this.]
¾ (e):
[λf . [λx . f(x) = 1 and x is gray] ] ( [λy . y is a cat] )
= [λx . [λy . y is a cat] (x) = 1 and x is gray]
= [λx . x is a cat and x is gray]
¾ (f):
[λf . [λx . f(x)(Ann) = 1] ] ( [λy . [λz . z saw y] ] )
= [λx . [λy . [λz . z saw y] ] (x)(Ann) = 1]
= [λx . [λz . z saw x](Ann) = 1]
= [λx . Ann saw x]
¾ (g):
[λx . [λy . y>3 and y<7] (x) ]
= [λx . x>3 and x<7]
¾ (h):
[λz . [λy . [λx . x>3 and x<7] (y) ] (z) ]
= [λz . [λy . y>3 and y<7] (z) ]
= [λz . z>3 and z<7]
[From von Fintel & Heim] Exercise 1.2 (p. 10)
[Also see the handout from 2/10/09, p. 4]
For the purposes of this solution, I’m going to skip the steps of putting together the
parts of the sentential argument a famous detective lives at 221B Baker St. (let’s call
this S):
¾ Intension of S:
[λw' . a famous detective lives at 221B Baker St. in w']
At this point in the reading we’re working with the most simple lexical entry for in
the world of Sherlock Holmes, where we’ve further stipulated that w9 is the world as
presented in the Sherlock Holmes stories:
¾ [[In the world of Sherlock Holmes]]w = [λp . p(w9)]
Here’s the computation (evaluating at w7):
1 24.910, Spring 2009 (Stephenson)
¾ [[In the world of Sherlock Holmes, a famous detective lives at 221B Baker St]]w7
= [[in the world of Sherlock Holmes]]w7 ( intension of S )
= [[in the world of Sherlock Holmes]]w7 ( [λw' . a famous detective lives at 221B
Baker St. in w'] )
= [λp . p(w9)] ( [λw' . a famous detective lives at 221B Baker St. in w'] )
= [λw' . a famous detective lives at 221B Baker St. in w'] (w9)
= (true iff) a famous detective lives at 221B Baker St. in w9
[From von Fintel & Heim] Exercise 1.3 (page 11)
Keep in mind that we’re using the simple version of the intensional semantics, as
above.
First, let’s give the extension and intension of the two conjuncts:
¾ Extensions:
[[Holmes is quick]]w = 1 iff Holmes is quick in w
[[Watson is slow]]w = 1 iff Watson is slow in w
¾ Intensions:
Intension of Holmes is quick: [λw' . [[Holmes is quick]]w']
= [λw' . Holmes is quick in w']
Intension of Watson is slow: [λw' . [[Watson is slow]]w']
= [λw' . Watson is slow in w']
¾ Now let’s go on to the computation. The first part is the same in both cases:
[[In the world of Sherlock Holmes, Holmes is quick and Watson is slow]]w
= [[in the world of Sherlock Holmes]]w ( λw' . [[Holmes is quick and Watson is
slow]]w' )
= [λp . p(w9)] ( [λw' . [[Holmes is quick and Watson is slow]]w'] )
= [λw' . [[Holmes is quick and Watson is slow]]w'] (w9)
= [[Holmes is quick and Watson is slow]]w9
At this point, we have to do the two computations separately:
¾ With extensional and:
[[and]]w = [λut . [λvt . u = v = 1] ]
[[Holmes is quick and Watson is slow]]w9 = [[and]]w9 ( [[Watson is slow]]w9 )
( [[Holmes is quick]]w9 )
= [λut . [λvt . u = v = 1] ] ( [[Watson is slow]]w9 ) ( [[Holmes is quick]]w9 )
= [λvt . [[Watson is slow]]w9 = v = 1] ( [[Holmes is quick]]w9 )
2 24.910, Spring 2009 (Stephenson)
= (true iff) [[Watson is slow]]w9 = [[Holmes is quick]]w9 = 1]
= (true iff) Watson is slow in w9 and Holmes is quick in w9
¾ With intensional and:
[[and]]w = [λp . [λq . p(w) = q(w) = 1] ]
[[Holmes is quick and Watson is slow]]w9 = [[and]]w9 ( [λw' . [[Watson is slow]]w'])
( [λw' . [[Holmes is quick]]w'] )
= [λp . [λq . p(w9) = q(w9) = 1] ] ( [λw' . [[Watson is slow]]w'])
( [λw' . [[Holmes is quick]]w'] )
= [λq . [λw' . [[Watson is slow]]w'](w9) = q(w9) = 1]
( [λw' . [[Holmes is quick]]w'] )
= [λq . [[Watson is slow]]w9 = q(w9) = 1] ( [λw' . [[Holmes is quick]]w'] )
= (true iff) [[Watson is slow]]w9 = [λw' . [[Holmes is quick]]w'] (w9) = 1]
= (true iff) [[Watson is slow]]w9 = [[Holmes is quick]]w9 = 1
= (true iff) Watson is slow in w9 and Holmes is quick in w9
[From von Fintel & Heim] Exercise 2.1 (page 19)
[Discussed in class – see handout from 2/24/09, pp. 3-4]
3