Relationship_Administrative_Law_QA Question 1: How does the concept of Global Administrative Law (GAL) differ from traditional views of international law? Answer: Global Administrative Law (GAL) diverges from traditional international law by adopting an inductive approach that analyzes existing governance practices, focusing less on their formal legal basis and more on their functionality and impact, including issues of justice and governance legitimacy beyond the nation-state framework. Question 2: Why did early international administrative law, as conceived by Lorenz von Stein, prioritize recording public administration over defining its legal foundations? Answer: Lorenz von Stein aimed to depict the actual practice of public administration rather than focusing on establishing a legal framework because his approach emphasized the realities and evolution of administrative actions across national and international domains, rather than rigid legal formalism. Question 3: What factors contributed to the emergence of transnational regulatory frameworks according to the text? Answer: The emergence was driven by the globalization of issues like financial regulation, labor standards, environmental concerns, and refugee movements, which overwhelmed national systems and necessitated cross-border agreements and regulatory cooperation. Question 4: How does public administration serve as an interdisciplinary field? Answer: Public administration draws from management, law, and political science disciplines, requiring the balancing of conflicting ideals such as efficiency, legality, and democratic responsiveness in government operations. Question 5: What criticisms have been leveled against public administration as an academic field? Answer: Critics argue that public administration has failed to keep pace with theoretical and methodological developments from related disciplines, often prioritizing management efficiency over legal norms or political responsiveness. Question 6: Why is comparative administrative law considered less developed than comparative constitutional law? Answer: Comparative administrative law is less developed due to its technical complexity, national specificity, and historical focus on private rather than public law by early comparative legal scholars, making systematic comparative efforts rarer and more difficult. Question 7: How does the North-South divide affect perceptions of international environmental law? Answer: The divide highlights skepticism toward the neutrality of international law, suggesting it often serves the interests of powerful (Northern) states at the expense of weaker (Southern) states, leading to doubts about its ability to achieve environmental justice.