Assignment 2A: Annotated Bibliography

Assignment 2A: Annotated bibliography XXXXXXX Student ID: XXXXXXXXX Swinburne University Online CRI10002: Fundamentals of Criminology XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX Word count: XXX Source 1 – Book chapter Hines, A. & Douglas, M. (2008). Men’s experiences of female- perpetrated intimate partner violence. In A. Hattery (Ed), Intimate partner violence (pp. 9-19). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated. Evaluation This chapter examines intimate partner violence (IPV) against men by female partners, delving into various abusive behaviours encompassing physical, sexual, psychological, and emotional abuse. It underscores the severity of this issue, addressing prevalence, experiences, and associated mental health outcomes for male victims. The misconceptions and stereotypes held by the public and service providers highlights their impact on men's experiences, advocating for a necessary shift in societal attitudes to ensure adequate support for male IPV victims. The research, sourced national population-based studies, including the seminal National Family Violence Survey (NFVS) in 1975, spanning four countries using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings reveal a substantial global prevalence of male victims of IPV, challenging stereotypes and emphasising the gravity of the issue. Despite advocacy biases, the credibility is reinforced by referencing established surveys, maintaining currency through recent studies. The source proves relevant, useful, appropriate although dated for comprehending IPV against men, offering valuable insights for confronting societal biases and supporting male victims. Source 2 – Peer reviewed study McLindon, E., Humphreys, C., & Hegarty, K. (2018). “It happens to clinicians too”: an Australian prevalence study of intimate partner and family violence against health professionals. BMC Women’s Health, 18(1), 113–113. Evaluation The study investigates the prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV) experienced by health professionals in Australia and it argues that health professionals, despite their role in helping others, can also be victims of IPV. It emphasises the need to recognise and address this issue within the healthcare community. The research involved a prevalence study conducted in Australia. The authors collected data through surveys, aiming to understand the extent of the issue and the findings revealed the prevalence of IPV and shedding light on a critical issue that impacts individuals within the healthcare field. The 2018 study in a peer-reviewed journal, demonstrates currency. Bias is mitigated through the use of empirical data and a focus on prevalence rather than subjective experiences. The article provides valuable insights into a less-explored aspect of IPV, offering a unique perspective on its occurrence within the healthcare profession. Authors took a supportive stance, advocating for acknowledgment and addressing IPV within the healthcare community. Strengths include the empirical approach, highlighting an underrecognised issue and an Australian study. Weaknesses include potential underreporting or limitations in capturing the full scope of the problem and only analysing 471 female victims and not including males. Source 3 – Peer reviewed study Smyth, C., Cullen, P., Breckenridge, J., Cortis, N., & valentine, kylie. (2021). COVID‐19 lockdowns, intimate partner violence and coercive control. The Australian Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 359–373. Evaluation The study explores the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on intimate partner violence (IPV) and coercive control in Australia. It argues that the COVID-19 lockdown measures have contributed to an increase in IPV and coercive control, highlighting the pandemic's impact on domestic violence (DV) dynamics. The research involves an examination of the relationship between the lockdowns and IPV. It includes the analysis of existing data, surveys and interviews to understand patterns and changes during lockdowns. The findings suggest a correlation between the lockdowns and a rise in IPV and coercive control, providing insights into the pandemic's unintended consequences on DV. The 2021 study in a peer-reviewed journal, it maintains currency. Bias might be present due to potential challenges in collecting accurate data on DV during a pandemic. The article is valuable for understanding the complex relationship between COVID-19 restrictions and IPV, contributing to the broader discussion on the pandemic's social impacts. The authors from various disciplines advocate for increased awareness of the impact of lockdowns on DV and the need for support systems. It addresses a critical timely National issue. Weaknesses may include challenges in precisely measuring the extent of IPV during lockdowns and only focussing on female victims. A highly relevant study and provides insights that could inform public health strategies, policy responses, and support mechanisms during future crises.