Free Will

FREE WILL When discussing free will, philosophers see two things: 1. What it means to vote freely 2. What is the moral impact of the decision However, after examining these two concepts further, more questions arise. Philosophers take many different approaches in trying to answer these questions. COMPATIBILITY AND INCOMPATIBILITY People who believe in matching things (also known as soft determines) believe that humans have free will but, this free will is seen as a conformity with determinism (which is cause and effect, and as a philosophical story that nothing happens by chance; Everything that happens is the result of what happened before, and everything about you and everything you do is inevitable.) According to incompatibility, humans can be free agents (and free to choose) if they are free from certain incompatibility. According to determinism and incompatibility, people's personalities and characteristics are determined in ways they cannot control (genetics, education, and the like.). But, if it becomes a mismatch, the existence of this incompatibility does not mean that one cannot freely choose, because the incompatibility of decisive things is determined. The definition of incompatibility is if a person is free to choose what a person can do if he or she complements himself. Picture page 145 But then, if not the determinism that is perceived as a barrier in matchmaking, what is his dexterity? According to fitting, any pressure can be followed by external factors. Therefore, free will is defined as freedom of action. As long as an individual is able to make his own decisions (even if those decisions are predetermined) from an external force (such as a prison), then that person has free will. In addition, some people do not believe in the following. People who believe in incompatibility actually state that determinism does not fit the idea of free will. For example, how can we be free to choose if every decision is made from birth? This does not mean that the mismatch states that freedom of choice exists or does not exist. In fact, incompatibility can be three things: 1. Hard determinism (which denies the existence of free will) 2. Libertarianism metaphysics (which states that free will already exists and denies any incompatibility) 3. Pessimistic incompatibility (which states that there is no free will and that incompatibility is true) The previous photo shows things that can be incompatibilities and inconsistencies: . Semi-compatibility is the idea that determinism is in line with moral responsibility. . A difficult mismatch is the belief that moral responsibility and free will do not fit into determinism. . An illusion is the belief that free will is only an illusion. The incompatibility that denies determinism accepts that an andom event must occur in the world (be it mental, biological. physical, etc.), and thus, there are randomness and accidents. This then creates a chain of unpredictable futures (as opposed to a future destined in determinism). Another form of incompatibility, that of metaphysical libertarianism, appears in four branches of causality: Picture page 146 This picture shows the following options: . That some events are unpredictable from previous events and are undesirable Soft causality is the belief that most events are predetermined. . Although some events are unpredictable, the agent-causal of libertarianism is the belief that a new causal chain can begin that is not determined by past events or natural laws. . The idea that to make independence, a struggle is not necessary. Those who believe incompatibility believe human beings can be free intermediaries (and have free will) when they are free from certain obstacles, and that personality and characteristics are determined in ways that come out of their hands (such as genetics or upbringing), while incompatibility denies that determinism plays a role in free will and accepts that random events and accidents therefore have to occur in the world (whether they are mental, biology, physics, etc.). RESPONSIBILITY When discussing free will, one should also discuss the idea of responsibility; Especially the difference between responsibility and moral responsibility. Responsibility is when a person takes on a task or burden and accepts the associated consequences. For example, if you take responsibility for organizing a conference to work, then you are not only taking responsibility for organizing the event, but you are also taking responsibility for the outcome; Whether it is a success or a failure. This is a responsibility. Moral responsibility, on the other hand, is a responsibility based on the Moral code. Let's say it's on the day of the conference, but there's a big snowstorm and no speakers can make it to the conference. You are responsible for the success or failure of the conference but are you m But why is that? If a person's actions are determined by the event they want to say, then a person's actions are the result of the event and have already happened. It seems that humans do feel responsible for their actions. planned since before birth, Libertarian will ask why eel reels are responsible for their actions. Similarly, if one's actions are completely random. Yet humans feel responsible for their actions. So, if a person is responsible for his acting, this should mean that the responsibility is caused by scmeth One does not need moral responsibility to have responsibility, but one certainly needs responsibility to have moral responsibility. REQUIREMENTS WILL BE FREE The requirements of freedom of choice should ideally satisfy both libertarianism (allowing for the impossibility necessary for freedom to flourish) and determinism (the love of causality necessary for moral acceptance). Here we see how free meet will be. Random needs Randomness, or freedom, freedom-seeking declares the absence of truth and chance. Actions considered. The Randomness Requirement Difficult to predict and not caused by external events; But they come from us. In order for there to be free will, there must also be the possibility of alternatives, and after the action has been taken, which is. Therefore, based on random needs, people create new causal chains and new information is generated. The suspicion that it could be done differently should be present. The determinism Requirement The determinism, or will, states that sufficient determinism (a determinism that has the ability to allow statistical predictability) must be true and that our actions are cPinot directly caused by chance. Furthermore, the persor must also be ensured to be strong, and every action must be determined by two choices of cause and effect The Moral Responsibility Requirement The imperative of moral responsibility is the result of the merger of random needs with the requirements of determinism. Which states that people are more responsible for their actions because there are alternative possibilities. People can do things in different ways coming from us, and our actions are determined by a person's will. The issue of free will is one that affects us all. Are we really free when making decisions? What are the implications of our decision?