Systems Approach to Instructional Design

Systems Approach to Instructional Design The Communication Paradigm conceptualizes and analyzes human communication. Communication, signal encoding, and social context are studied in this field. Communication paradigms include symbolic interaction, intercultural communication, shared meaning, and communication complexity. The Communication Paradigm was influenced by the 1949 Shannon and Weaver model. This paradigm emphasizes technological communication, such as sending and receiving messages via multiple channels. This model describes communication as sending information from a sender to a receiver across a channel that is sensitive to interference and information loss. The technique stresses good encoding, fast delivery, and precise comprehension. However, the Communication Paradigm goes beyond Shannon and Weaver's technological model to describe communication as a complicated social phenomena. This paradigm stresses that communication involves message generation, encoding, transmission, receipt, decryption, and feedback. Communication involves understanding, meaning, and symbolically connecting with others. The Communication Paradigm includes symbolic touch. George Herbert Mead and Charles H. Cooley's idea stresses symbols and meaning in human communication. Words, body language, and facial expressions are used to communicate in this view. Symbols help humans communicate. This mechanism underpins interpersonal and institutional communication. Context matters in the Communication Paradigm. This paradigm understands that communication is integrally linked to its social, cultural, and historical environment. Societal conventions, values, and roles affect communication. Culture's communication, attitudes, and behaviors make up its context. "Historical context" refers to social changes and advancements that might affect communication. The Intercultural Communication Perspective is crucial and important to the Communication Paradigm. Today's globalized world demands cross-cultural communication. This paradigm acknowledges cultural variations in communication and stresses detecting and respecting them throughout the communication process. Intercultural communication entails knowing other cultures' conventions, values, languages, and communicative behaviors. Awareness of these differences may improve communication and prevent cultural conflict. The Communication Paradigm defines effective communication as sharing a meaning. A shared meaning occurs when two persons understand and interpret the same message. The sender and receiver must be able to decipher and understand a message to reach a consensus. To convey information, goals, and emotions, sender and receiver must have a shared meaning. The Communication Paradigm acknowledges that human communication is complicated. The sender, message, route, recipient, and context interact and impact each other. Language, clarity, trust, openness, and power relations may affect this complexity. Understanding the complexity of communication may lead to better understanding, fewer misunderstandings, and stronger relationships. The Communication Paradigm offers a comprehensive method for researching and measuring human communication. This paradigm addresses communication models, symbolic interaction, communication context, intercultural communication, shared meaning, and communication complexity to explain how people and society send, receive, and interpret messages.