Summary: Federal Trade Commission Act and Consumer Protection Laws
(Part 2)
1. Communication Standards Under the FDCPA
Lawyers Representing Consumers: The FDCPA assumes that lawyers are
generally knowledgeable about debt collection laws. However, the act
requires that the same written notice (e.g., information about the debt) be
sent to a lawyer representing a consumer as would be sent directly to the
consumer.
Deception and Misrepresentation Standards:
o For Lawyers: Deceptive practices that would not mislead a
competent lawyer are generally not actionable. However, false factual
statements, such as misrepresenting the unpaid balance, are actionable
regardless of the recipient’s sophistication.
o For Consumers: The FDCPA adopts the "unsophisticated consumer"
standard, focusing on whether a statement could mislead a person of
limited education or commercial experience.
o Special Cases: When targeting vulnerable consumer groups (e.g.,
non-English speakers), courts assess communications from the
perspective of the most vulnerable members of that group.
2. Settlement Offers
Potential Misleading Practices: Settlement offers often use urgent
language, such as “limited-time offer,” which may mislead unsophisticated
consumers into thinking they have no future opportunities to settle.
Safe Harbor Language: To address concerns of deception, debt collectors
can include statements such as, “We are not obligated to renew this offer,”
which acknowledges the possibility of future offers while avoiding
deception.
Use of Consumer Surveys: Evidence such as professionally conducted
surveys is necessary to establish whether communications are likely to
mislead a significant number of recipients.
3. Case Summaries
Lauer Case: A debt collector failed to provide the required notice to either
the lawyer or consumer. Threatening to dispose of items with sentimental
value was potentially coercive and could violate FDCPA provisions. The
district court's dismissal was reversed.
Captain Case: A debt collector's settlement letter included a potentially
deceptive statement about a $15 daily penalty, which could violate state law.
Dismissal of this claim was reversed.
Evory and Jackson Cases: Both involved settlement offers directly sent to
consumers. The courts emphasized that while such offers are not deceptive
per se, liability depends on evidence of consumer deception. The district
court's ruling in Evory was reversed; Jackson's dismissal was upheld due to
insufficient evidence.
4. Consumer Product Safety Regulation
Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA): Established the Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC), which regulates consumer product
safety through:
1. Issuing safety standards and warnings.
2. Banning hazardous products.
3. Pursuing legal actions to mitigate imminent dangers.
4. Addressing substantial product hazards reported to the agency.
2008 Amendments: In response to toy safety concerns, Congress increased
the CPSC’s budget, mandated studies on chemical hazards in children's
products, and enacted regulations to address safety issues, including bans on
hazardous all-terrain vehicles (ATVs).
5. Case Example: International Harvester
Issue: For 17 years, International Harvester failed to adequately warn
consumers about the risks of "fuel geysering" from its gasoline-powered
tractors, leading to severe injuries and one death.
FTC Action: The FTC found the lack of warnings "unfair" under the FTC
Act because the injuries outweighed the costs of providing effective
warnings.
Ethical Debate: Balancing human safety against economic costs raises
moral concerns:
o Some argue human life is invaluable and should not be weighed
against economic benefits.
o Others justify cost-benefit analyses to ensure feasible solutions
without imposing disproportionate burdens on businesses. 6. Advertising and Deceptive Practices
Listerine Case: The FTC required Warner-Lambert to issue corrective
advertising for false claims that Listerine could prevent or treat colds and
sore throats.
Part 11- Regulation of Business, Chapter 48: The Federal Trade Commission Act and Consumer Protection Laws, Note 7
of 3
Report
Tell us what’s wrong with it:
Thanks, got it!
We will moderate it soon!
Free up your schedule!
Our EduBirdie Experts Are Here for You 24/7! Just fill out a form and let us know how we can assist you.
Take 5 seconds to unlock
Enter your email below and get instant access to your document