Key Issues and Analysis in Sarah Saunders' Hybrid Vehicle Purchase:
1. Right to Inspect Before Payment:
o Issue: Sarah was denied the chance to inspect the vehicle before
paying in full, contrary to UCC provisions that typically allow buyers
the right to inspect goods before finalizing payment.
o Analysis: The UCC §2–513 generally provides buyers the right to
inspect goods upon delivery before paying. Refusal by the dealer's
agent (the truck driver) to allow inspection likely violated Sarah’s
rights under the UCC.
2. Rejection for Nonconforming Goods:
o Issue: The car had visible scratches and missing features such as the
CD player Sarah requested, making it nonconforming to their
contract.
o Analysis: Under UCC §2–601, buyers can reject goods if they fail to
conform to the contract terms. Sarah could have rightfully rejected the
vehicle due to the defects and missing options, requiring the dealer to
provide a replacement that met her specifications.
3. Returning the Vehicle for a Defective Engine:
o Issue: The vehicle had persistent mechanical issues, including a
tendency to stall, which were not resolved after multiple repair
attempts.
o Analysis: Under UCC §2–608, Sarah can revoke acceptance if a
defect substantially impairs the value of the goods and if it wasn’t
discovered at the time of acceptance. Since the dealer failed to fix the
problem despite multiple attempts, Sarah may argue her right to return
the vehicle and either demand a replacement or refund.
4. Ethical Implications of Delivering a Defective Vehicle:
o Issue: If the dealer knew about the scratches, missing features, and
mechanical issues, delivering the vehicle without disclosure may
breach ethical standards of good faith and fair dealing.
o Analysis: The UCC §1–203 requires all parties to act in good faith.
Concealing known issues contravenes this duty, potentially
undermining trust and ethical standards, especially when selling to
consumers who rely on seller expertise and honest disclosure.
Legal Framework for Sales Contract Performance
Good Faith (UCC §1–203): Both parties must perform honestly and in
accordance with reasonable commercial standards.
Course of Dealing & Usage of Trade (UCC §1–205): The history of
transactions and trade customs can clarify contract terms but do not override
explicit contract terms.
Inspection Rights (UCC §2–513): Buyers generally have the right to
inspect goods before payment unless explicitly waived.
Acceptance and Revocation (UCC §§2–601 and 2–608): Buyers can reject
nonconforming goods or, after acceptance, revoke it if the defects
substantially impair value.
Modification and Waiver (UCC §2–209): Contracts can be modified
without consideration if agreed to by both parties, and waivers can be
retracted with reasonable notice unless reliance on the waiver makes it
unjust.
In summary, Sarah’s situation highlights rights regarding inspection, rejection,
revocation, and ethical dealings in sales contracts. The UCC provides various
protective measures for buyers facing nonconforming goods or breach of good
faith, which Sarah could potentially leverage to seek a resolution.
Part 4- Sales, Chapter 21: Performance of Sales Contracts, Doc 1
of 2
Report
Tell us what’s wrong with it:
Thanks, got it!
We will moderate it soon!
Free up your schedule!
Our EduBirdie Experts Are Here for You 24/7! Just fill out a form and let us know how we can assist you.
Take 5 seconds to unlock
Enter your email below and get instant access to your document