University:
Saginaw Valley State University
Course:
KINE 234 | EBP in Healthcare
Academic year:

2023
Views:

244

Pages:

2
Author:

Sabrina Berry

Study Examining the Effects of Training on PFPS in Collegiate Female Soccer Players Outcome Exposure Yes (+) PFPS No (-) PFPS Total Intervention group Exposed group (McConnell Taping & Exercise) 10 91 101 Control Group Non-exposed group (Exercise only) 35 66 101 Total 45 157 202 1. What is TOTAL population size? 202 2. What is the injury risk for the intervention group? 9% 3. Injury risk for the control group? 35% 4. Given the data in 2 x 2 - what is the relative risk (RR) for developing PFPS collegiate female soccer players? 25.7% 5. Based on question 4, we could say, “The relative risk indicates the female collegiate soccer players who participated in the intervention group (McConnell Taping & Exercise) have a increased reduction in injury risk compared to those in the control group.” 6. Calculate the ARR from the information (2 x 2 table) above. 26% 7. Based on the information in question 6, we could say, “The ARR indicates there is an increased reduction in the number of PFPS injuries per 100 female collegiate soccer players who receive intervention. 8. Calculate the RRR from the information (2 x 2 table) above. 0.743 9. The relative risk reduction (RRR) indicates the experimental group has a 71% less chance of experiencing PFPS than the control group. 10.What is the variable assessed with the formula = probability of exposure with the condition ÷ probability of exposure without the condition? 0.286 11.Calculate the odds ratio from the information (2 x 2 table) above. 0.286

Training Effects on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome in Soccer Players

Related Documents

Description

Related Documents

Free up your schedule!

Take 5 seconds to unlock