The American eagle has landed in the Philippines. In the first days, we were not sure if we were there to liberate or occupy the Filipino people. At first, it was considered liberation. The Philippines had been a Spanish colony for numerous centuries. The Americans chased out the Spanish, and the future was regarded as clear. The chief of the Filipino revolutionaries, Emilio Aguinaldo, used to be geared up to march into the Philippine capital with us and declare Filipino independence. But it didn't happen. Now we have to stay. Should this have happened? Are we doing the proper element by using a way of annexing this island country? The answer, my fellow Senators, is a robust 'Yes.' There are three large reasons: the Filipinos are no longer organized for self-government, the Filipinos would be devoured by some different country, and it is God's design.
The first reason the United States used to be proper to annex the Philippines is that the Filipinos are no longer successful in self-rule. Senator Albert Beveridge of Indiana argues the issue well. Yes, he says, authorities must be by using the use of the consent of the governed, alternatively solely when the human beings are mature sufficient to govern themselves. He noted we govern our youngsters without their consent. Like formative years the Filipinos prefer our safety (Doc B). President William McKinley made a comparable point. If the United Štates left the Philippines to themselves the result would be 'anarchy and misrule' (Doc C). McKinley noted it was our duty to instruct and civilize the Philippine people. Beveridge and McKinley have been right. The Philippines needed increased time. After all, the American colonies had been governed with the aid of skill of the British for a hundred and fifty years until now when they had been geared up for independence.
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
The 2nd purpose of annexing the Philippines was that colonizing international locations like England, France, and Germany were ready to pounce if the United States decided to leave. Gentlemen, McKinley used to be right when he said that it would be foolish to turn the Philippines over to our exchange opponents in Asia (Doc C). Senator Beveridge also mentions that Japan used to be 'hungering' for the islands (Doc B). If the Philippines had been no longer outfitted to govern themselves, it would have been unwise to let them fall into the fingers of a US that would deal with them badly. You do not turn your young humans over to the wolves.
Finally, we have been right to maintain the Philippines because it is God's plan. Providence wishes America to grow. First it was once once Louisiana, then Oregon, then California. This growth endured with Alaska and then Hawaii. Now it is the Philippines. Is there a higher religion than Christianity? Is there a greater authority than democracy? It was our show-up future to take the Philippines, and like the cartoon, put it beneath our wing. (Hook) In Beveridge's simple words, 'Wonderfully has God guided us!' (Doc B) America ought to by no means say 'No' to God.
In conclusion, in all challenging matters, there are arguments for annexing the Philippines. The American Anti-Imperialist League used be right to be unhappy about the loss of lifestyles of so many soldiers, both American and Filipino (Doc A). William Jennings Bryan was once right to say that the Bible no longer approves of weapons and struggle (Doc D) But incredible motives are now not acquired except for paying a price. We found that at Valley Forge and Gettysburg. With God on our side, and the future of the islands in our hearts, America is doing the ideal element by way of annexing the Philippines.
Stuck on your essay?
