Authors have different motivations to write either a poem or a novel. Writers display similarities and differences when developing their work. The differences among authors may be established on different grounds, including inspiration to write, challenges when developing content for different works as well as factors contributing to their success. However, authors may also exhibit a number of differences in developing their writing works. The differences can be established while considering the form style of writing, the choice of language, tone of the writing, and the use of literary devices. Authors adopt a unique style of writing as a way of developing unique and distinctive content for their targeted audience. It is a strategy that creates a difference for different pieces of work that an author uses to present different themes.
This essay is a comparison of two writings, “How to Tame a Wild Tongue” by Gloria Anzaldua and “The Joy of Reading and Writing: Superman and Me” by Sherman Alexi. Anzaldua and Alexi show similarities in their writings as the focus on describing their personal life experiences. Both writing adopts a biopic style as the general as authors present chronological events in their lives. A common factor is a focus on the reasons as to why they ended up as writers. In this sense, much emphasis is placed on challenges experienced at a tender age and motivation gained to be writers. Alexi notes, “I learned to read with a Superman comic book.
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
Simple enough, I suppose. I cannot recall which particular Superman comic book I read…” This statement implies the passion for reading that drove Alexi to start writing. Similarly, Anzaldua states, “I remember being caught speaking Spanish at recess…” In both cases, Alexi and Anzaldua speak about their personal experiences. Another significant similarity between the works of Alexi and Anzaldua is the use of the first-person perspective. It is an appropriate style for the two pieces of writing because they give accounts of their own life experiences. The choice of the first-person perspective is necessary for the authors to understand the characters in the writings easily. Even more, a further similarity is observed that the authors are the only characters in the writings. Despite the similarities, Alexia and Anzaldua have also used different styles of writing that creates a distinction between their works. First, Alexi’s and Anzaldua’s writing is based on different settings.
The setting for Alexi writing is California in the late 1990s. It is a writing in which Alexi provides feedback on his earlier life, indicating how he learned to read and write. The work is written at the turn of the century, indicating the intention of Alexi to spread hope to people living in reservations. It is a writing that helps minorities to have hope that their voices can be heard. The minority in this context refers to individuals from a poor background. On the other hand, the setting of Anzaldua’s work is Mexico. Anzaldua explains her experience as an immigrant from Texas. The setting of the book helps readers to learn about social and cultural differences is a common way of life. The second significant difference is the purpose of the writings. The purpose of Alexi’s presents an indication that individuals should not have be affluent to learn. For instance, Alexi gives a personal experience of developing a reading habit by reading comic books.
Alexi notes that reading a superman comic is simple, and anyone can obtain despite the economic status. Anzaldua’s purpose in writing is to imply that individuals should not be ashamed of speaking their native languages. Anzaldua gives a personal experience in speaking Spanish despite the challenge that she faces in Mexico. The other difference emerges from the tone of writing. Alexi uses an inspirational tone as he focuses on the use of positive words. On the other hand, Anzaldua’s tone is passionate and deterministic. Anzaldua explains her experience of showing passion in speaking her native mother tongue in a foreign country. Anzaldua is determined to continue speaking her native language. Another significant difference is the target audience. Alexi’s focuses on a wider audience to address the issue of Indian children being considered an unintelligent. Anzaldua focuses on a narrow audience emphasizing the needs of immigrants to stick to their native languages. Anzaldua and Alexi play significant effects on the development of poetry. First, the description of personal life experiences helps to create an understanding of the plot of poetry. The description of personal experience contributes to the development of the content.
Second, Anzaldua also plays the role of contributing to the development of themes. For instance, the two poetries have different themes despite the authors focusing their content on personal lives. It is critical to note that Anzaldua and Alexi focus on different aspects of personal life hence contributing to the development of diverse themes. Finally, the discussion of personal life experiences helps to help to give a representation of the wider perspective of different phenomenon. Anzaldua’s life experience is a representation of immigrants’ challenges, whereas Alexi’s experience is a representation of challenges that minorities face in society. Work Cited Alexie, S. (1998). Superman and me. Los Angeles Times, 19. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). How to tame a wild tongue (pp. 2947-2955). na.
Stuck on your essay?
