Employee Engagement and Gamification: Discursive Essay

1. Gamification:

Gamification has been around for many years. Around early 1900s companies offered free gifts with multiple purchases. But gamification gained the name near the start of 2000, around 2010. It’s been a growing part of modern business. In 2013 gamification was described as the “hottest business buzzword” (McCormick, 2013). “It’s not just a buzzword; the gamification market is forecast to be worth $5.5 billion annually by 2018, according to Markets and Markets”. Gamification is used in diverse contexts such as retail, health and wellbeing, education. SAP used games for educating its employees on sustainability, Unilever uses it for training, Hays for hiring recruiters and Khan for online education. Organisations can see the outcomes like performance, employee engagement and retention, according to (Aberdeen, 2013). According to the analysts, gamification will be used in 25 percent of redesigned business processes by 2015 (Burke B. , 2012) will grow to more than a $2.8 billion business by 2016, and will have 70 percent of Global 2000 businesses managing at least one “gamified” application or system by 2014 (Inc, 2011). The main goal of gamification is to increase the user’s engagement by using game like features like scoreboards, personalized fast feedback (Flatla, 2011)making the employees feel more ownership and purpose when engaging with tasks (Pavlus, 2010). Gamification is using game elements in the activities that are supposed to raise motivation, but for that to happen, we need to pay attention to the integration of tasks and exercises within the game design (Luis von Ahn, 2008). It also is a way to socially interact with other participants and they naturally respond in social ways and follow social rules like take turn (Fogg, 2002). Routine activities tend to bore employees hence activities combined with games can motivate people effectively (Chrons, 2011). Gamification is now used in education too. According to Gartner Group, gamification will be a key trend that very CIO, IT planner and enterprise architect must be aware of as it relates to business (Group, 2011). It has already been added to Gartner Hype Cycle for 2011 (Group, 2011).

2. Employee Engagement and Gamification:

Employee engagement helps an organisation gain competitive advantage over others. People is one thing that a competitor cannot replicate and is considered as a treasured asset if they are manage and engaged correctly. As per (Baumruk, 2004)employee engagement is the most powerful aspect to measure a company’s vigour. In 1990 (Kahn W. A.) introduced the concept of employee engagement, giving his definition quoted in the introduction, namely, “the harnessing of organization members’ selves to their work roles; in engagement, people employ and express themselves physically, cognitively, and emotionally during role performances”. There are 3 psychological conditions for an employee to be engaged: meaningfulness (work elements), safety (social elements, including management style, process, and organisational norms) and availability (individual distractions).

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

Place an order

Employee engagement brings forth numerous advantages for the firm. Employee engagement is a tool which could be deployed in the organization so that the talent is appropriately deployed and harnessed effectively. It helps in building employee commitment and helps employees perform better in their roles. It leads to focused efforts and better outcomes. It translates into greater innovation, commitment to organisation, positive energy and higher productivity. It also leads to lower attrition levels and absenteeism. Engaged employees love their jobs, believe their employer, company goals and the manner in which they conduct their business (Smartmanager.com, 2012). They exhibit high levels of passion and creativity and they believe they create value and management.

Different people have different needs and desires and the satisfaction level of the motivational factors keeps changing. Therefore it is a challenge for all the HR professionals today to understand their employees as groups and accordingly incorporate the motivational factors as a set or group of rewards for different groups of employees (Singh, 2012).

Modern generation of workers are more focused on the diverse use of their knowledge, skills, creativity and are looking for freedom and independence at work which makes gamification as relevant as ever. (Kamasheva, 2015)

(Schmidt, 2007) defines employee engagement as employees’ “involvement with, commitment to and satisfaction with work.”Accenture’s quiz based “Path to Success” Facebook app tested the aptitude of the users while keeping them engaged in an interesting gameplay. Participants had to roll the dice to land on a tile and they were faced with a trivia question and rewarded for each correct answer while they climbed up the corporate ladder. This helped the company engage their employees and subsequently build a pipeline of talent with the help of the data collected through this game. (Manchanda, 2014)

In a report by Gallup, it was found that over 70 percent of employees are disengaged. This explains the importance inventing innovative engagement strategies (Bradt, 2013).

Moreover, studies have shown that the millennials represent the least engaged workforce (almost two-thirds) who need to be taken care of in order to thrive in a highly competitive economy (Pyle, 2015).

To engage the disengaged employees’ heads, hearts and hands, organisations must adopt these ten C’s of employee engagement: Connect, Career, Clarity, Convey, Congratulate, Contribute, Control, Collaborate, Credibility and Confidence (Seijts, 2006).

SAP, to motivate and engage its massive salesforce, implemented a gamified application “Roadwarrior” which enables the sales reps to compete against each other in a multiple choice type game to become leaders of their own expertise. (Pyle, 2015)

Statistics show that 43% highly engaged employees receive feedback at least once a week as compared to 18% of employees with low engagement (Lyons, 2017). Thus, constant feedback and recognition is also one of the best ways to engage the disengaged employees. This can be successfully achieved through gamification. Telstra Australia has introduced an embedded social recognition system to radically improve its employee engagement levels. Here, social media and smart boards are used to recognise colleagues through a gaming smart board method which saw an increase in the engagement levels over time.

In 2010, a Colorado restaurant implemented a gamification-based employee program with the goal of motivating waiters and waitresses to increase sales of specific menu items. Participating staff were awarded chances to play online “random-point-yielding games when they sold a fresh-squeezed orange juice or a a4-pack of cinnamon rolls”. Points were redeemable by staff for a branded debit card. One case study estimated that the[restaurant] realized an ROI of 66.2 percent due to an increase in sales of the targeted menu items” (SUCCESS: Improving Sales in a Restaurant Environment, 2017)

Maintaining self-efficacy, identity and a sense of worth and belongingness is of vital importance. In this context, self-managed companies use games like DueProps which gives points and recognition for meeting goals. It is available atDueprops.com for a reasonable price of $29 per month for20 users and is suitable for use in various small and medium-sized organizations or selectively even within larger companies (Specialist, 2014).

Gamification may provide ways to engage employees is ways not previously seen. “Games create an emotionally compelling context for the player and build on nostalgia, curiosity, visual appeal and employees’ interest. They connect with the player emotionally and are an invitation into a world that is to be learned” (CIPD, 2012 a).

Utilizing these concepts within the internal organizational environment may enhance engagement by appealing to the employees’ sense of fun (which can take various forms – e.g. see (Lazzaro, 2004)

A simple example of a game-like tool aimed at getting people to further engage in a concept is the use of the profile completeness tool on LinkedIn. Within an organisational business environment it might be about the application of game elements (e.g. points for cross-departmental project teams) to encourage team-working and collaboration assuming those are key business imperatives. Gamification may aid retention of employees through the encouragement of engagement in activity that the employee considers to be meaningful (at least at that particular time). According to (Burke B., 2014b) the key to sustainable gamification is to architect behaviour change “primarily with intrinsic rewards rather than extrinsic rewards - that we are able to sustain momentum by ensuring that, as people engage in a game, the challenge matches the skill level and we are able to provide people with meaningful incentives”.

From a psychological standpoint, engagement inan experience comprises the energy, involvement,and efficacy felt by the individual in the experience (Maslach, 1997)

Employee engagement entails ‘harnessing’ employees to their jobs through their involvement, satisfaction, and enthusiasm for work (Kahn W., 1990).

Engagement can have impactful implications for managers: it can be positively associated with organizational commitment and organizational citizenship, but also negatively associated with intentions to quit (Saks, 2006).

Moreover, increased employee engagement has been linked to increased customer satisfaction (Harter, 2002), which is why it is not surprising that it is in the interest of managers to improve internal behavioral attributes. However, achieving high employee engagement is not easy.

(Freshdesk.) claims that by gamifying the everyday work of helpdesk employees, who are often demotivated and over-stressed, its program results in reduced response times to customer inquiries and the ability to expand beyond its traditional channels of support by motivating employees to keep on task and perform well at their jobs (Finley, 2012). The Freshdesk solution involves transforming customer inquiries (e.g., telephone questions, comments posted on Twitter and Facebook) into virtual tickets that are then randomly assigned to players (i.e., customer service employees). In this way, Freshdesk inspires a real-time, competitive environment via which players compete to improve their performance. Freshdesk shows that employing gamification mechanics, dynamics, and emotions can increase fun, enthusiasm, and excitement at work in customer support centers.

As call centers are notorious for being stressful work environments (Neidermeyer & Tuten, 2004); (Proper, 1998); (Tuten, 2004), and often rely on a‘ sacrificial HR strategy’ (Wallace, 2000) whereby employees are deliberately and frequently replaced in order to maintain enthusiastic customer support, the successful application of gamification in this context is particularly striking.

Indeed, gamification in this context can lead to increases in job satisfaction and improved employee engagement and performance, and ultimately in superior organizational success. Even when teams compete, individual players are involved in competition or cooperation at the team level while also vying for the lead within their team (Bengtsson, 2000). This competition dynamic is highly desirable for managers and organizations, as it improves the individual, team, and ultimately organizational success.

In addition, collecting points simply for collection’s sake would be unlikely to motivate strivers or slayers. The experience failed to elicit desirable dynamics, such as competition or competition, or emotions such as pride or challenge. Without the appropriate dynamics and emotional responses–—which emerge due to gamification mechanics–—players will ‘bounce’ and seek the same response elsewhere (Tsotsis, 2011).

Ultimately, managers must remember that the root of engagement is establishing a connection between the experience and the people involved in the experience (Zichermann, 2011).

I. [bookmark: _Toc536047508]Limitations

(Werbach, 2012) opined that, gamification builds on psychology from management, marketing and other disciplines, with some added concepts from game design. However, he stated that, just like any other management tool, it can be oversold or abused. It needs to be done thoughtfully to have a good chance of success. Gamification must, therefore, not be implemented in a “shallow way, with all the focus on external rewards” and discounting the underlying activity as stated by (Werbach, 2012). He advises managers to be aware of the limitations of gamification and to keep it within a structured design process. “Well-designed gamification can make employees feel more empowered in their tasks, because it gives them a wide range of feedback and a stronger sense of accomplishment.” According to (Mollick, 2014), gamification is not just about fun. It’s about how the company engage enough employees to ensure that the employees want to stay at work. The authors discovered that giving people a choice of theme gave them a feeling of empowerment that helps them embrace the game. The idea is to make gamification cooperative and not imposed.

References

1. Aberdeen, G. (2013). Is it time to gamify your onboarding program? Aberdeen group.
2. Baumruk, R. (2004, January). The role of employee engagement in business success.
3. Bengtsson, M. &. (2000). ‘‘Coopetition’’ in business networks: To cooperate and compete simultaneously. 29(5), 411-426. Industrial Marketing Management.
4. Bradt, G. (2013, June 3). How Salesforce And Deloitte Tackle Employee Engagement With Gamification. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgebradt/2013/07/03/how-salesforce-and-deloitte-tackle-employee-engagement-with-gamification/#495645362ac7
5. Burke, B. (2012, November 5). Gamification 2020: What is the future of Gamification. Gartner Inc.
6. Burke, B. (2014b). Gamify: How Gamification Motivates People to Do Extraordinary Things.
7. Chrons, O. a. (2011, August 8). Digitalkoot: Making Old Archives Accessible Using. San Francisco.
8. CIPD. (2012 a, April). From e-learning to 'gameful' employment. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.: Sustainable Organisation Performance Research program. Retrieved from https://www.cipd.co.uk/toolclicks/learning/training-practice/research/from-elearning-gameful-employ/default.aspx
9. Finley, K. (2012, September 17). Freshdesk wants to make customer service fun with game mechanics. TechCrunch. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/17/freshdesk-wants-tomake-customer-service-fun-with-game-mechanics/
10. Flatla, D. (2011). Calibration Games:Making Calibration Tasks Enjoyable by Adding Motivating Game Elements. Santa Barbara, California: UIST.
11. Fogg, B. J. (2002, December). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change what we think and do. Ubiquity.
12. Freshdesk. (n.d.). Integrated game mechanics: Get the boring out of customer support. Retrieved from http://freshdesk.com/scaling-support/gamification-support-help-desk
13. Group, G. (2011). 'Gartner Says By 2015, More Than 50 Percent of Organizations That Manage Innovation Processes Will Gamify Those Processes.
14. Harter, J. K. (2002). Business-unit level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268—279.
15. Inc, G. (2011, December 20). Innovation Insight. Gamification Adds Fun and Innovation to inspire engagement.
16. Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
17. Kahn, W. A. (n.d.). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at work. 33, 4, 692-724. Academy of Management Journal.
18. Kamasheva, A. V. (2015). Usage of gamification theory for increased motivation of employees. 6(1), 77.
19. Lazzaro, N. (2004, August 8). Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion Without Story. Retrieved from http://www.xeodesign.com/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf
20. Luis von Ahn, L. D. (2008, August). Designing games with a purpose. 51(8), 58-67. New York, New York, USA: Communications of the ACM.
21. Lyons, R. (2017, July 10). Feedback: You Need To Lead It. Retrieved from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/richlyons/2017/07/10/feedback-you-need-to-lead-it/#240437714a35
22. Manchanda, S. (2014, January 20). Understanding Gamification – How Leading Brands Are Using Gamification for Employee Engagement and Hiring. Retrieved from https://www.socialsamosa.com/2014/01/gamification-indian-organizations-examples/
23. Maslach, C. &. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. McCormick, T. (2013). Anthropology of an idea. Gamification: Why everybody from corporate titans to terrorists, wants to make life more like a game, 201, 26-27. Foreign Policy.
25. Mollick, E. R. (2014, September 30). Mandatory Fun: Consent, Gamification and the Impact of Games at Work. The Wharton School Research Paper Series.
26. Neidermeyer, P., & Tuten, T. (2004, January). Performance, satisfaction and turnover in call centers: The effects of stress and optimism. Journal of Business Research, 57(1), 26-34.
27. Pavlus, J. (2010, December). The Game of Life. Scientific American.
28. Proper, E. (1998). Is your call center dysfunctional? Industry Week, 247(14), 16.
29. Pyle, C. (2015, November 16). How gamification can save the disengaged workforce. Retrieved from Entrepreneur: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/252887
30. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
31. Schmidt, S. W. (2007, December). The Relationship between Satisfaction with Workplace Training and Overall Job Satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18(4), 481-498.
32. Seijts, G. H. (2006). What engages employees the most or, the ten C’s of employee engagement. Ivey Business Journal, 70(4), 1-5.
33. Shneiderman, B. (2004, October). Designing for fun: how can we design user interfaces to be more fun? 11(5), 48-50 . New york, New YorK, USA.
34. Singh, S. P. (2012). Gamification: A strategic tool for organizational effectiveness. 1(1), 108-113.
35. Specialist, T. H. (2014, February 10). How HR can use ‘gamification’ to recruit, train and engage employees. Retrieved from inhttp://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/37753/game-on-how-hr-can-use-gamification-to-recruit-trainand-engage-employees
36. SUCCESS: Improving Sales in a Restaurant Environment. (2017, February 21). Retrieved from Snowfly: https://snowfly.com/incentives/case-study-gamification-based-employee-incentives-aimed-at-improving-sales-in-a-restaurant-environment/
37. Tsotsis, A. (2011, June 30). Bing Gordon: Every startup CEO should understand gamification. TechCrunch. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2011/06/30/bing-gordon-everystartup-ceo-should-understand-gamification/
38. Tuten, T. L. (2004). Performance, satisfaction, and turnover in call centers: The effects of stress and optimism. Journal of Business Research., 57(1), 26-34.
39. Wallace, C. M. (2000). The sacrificial HR strategy in call centers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(2), 174—184.
40. Werbach, K. &. (2012, October 30). For the Win: How Game Thinking Can Revolutionize Your Business.
41. Zichermann, G. &. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in Web and mobile apps. San Francisco: O’Reilly Media.