Leadership: A Leadership expert Warren Bennis stated, “Leadership is the capacity to translate vision into reality”. Great leaders possess dazzling social intelligence, a zest for change, and above all they can prioritize their work that truly merits attention (PT). Furthermore, we can also state that Leadership is the process of influencing the behavior, attitudes, activities, and efforts of an individual or a group to achieve a common goal. There are 9 Leadership styles all having specific pros and cons (Week 2, Class Presentation Slide 4-8). The style that I believe suits me best is Autocratic Leadership.
Autocratic Leadership: Kurt Lewin created the autocratic leadership style theory in 1939 while helping business leaders better understand their natural leadership style (SBC). In this style, Leader takes the responsibility for project outcomes as well as for getting things done efficiently and effectively (Week 2, Class Presentation Slide-9). According to economic times, Autocratic leadership is a management style wherein one person controls all the decisions and takes very little input from other group members. Autocratic leaders make choices or decisions based on their own beliefs and do not involve others in their suggestions or advice (ET).
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
Personal Experience: In my past work experience when I worked as Director of Operations for a Flooring Company, I believe my way of getting things done was Autocratic and I found it very effective. After gaining product knowledge for the company, I started to handle a team of 10-15 people which included 3 Supervisor, 2 Sales Associates, and Masons. It was an experience of 10 months where my team completed 15 projects under my leadership. After researching this style I found that the challenges faced by me as a leader had similarities with the disadvantages of autocratic leadership. For instance, there were times when my team would not start work until I arrived at the Project Site because they did not want to be blamed if something went wrong, Hence, creating a system of dependency.
Advantages of Autocratic Leadership Style:
Clear Vision: The autocratic chief is in control, and its pioneer's vision is handed off to representatives. There is no disarray about the bearing of the organization. Its main goal and vision are clear. Not at all like law-based style where the chief requests contributions from the group that could sloppy the vision and question who is in control. (SBC)
Everyone Knows Expectations: In an organization with an autocratic leader the vision is obviously clarified and continually passed on, and workers have clear desires set by the dictatorial pioneer. While this could prompt an unpleasant workplace where individuals are worried that poor execution will prompt rejection, it has leeway. Consider the business group that must hit certain numbers to produce the incomes required to stay with the gainful. Those are objectives that must be met (SBC)
Quick Decision-Making Process: At the point when there is an absolutist initiative built up inside an association, there are fewer dimensions of an organization that must be kept educated of every choice. There is additionally less criticism from different dimensions of the board which must be handled. That is because there is one individual who supervises all courses of action (BG).
Improves Productivity: Since imperious pioneers can move data all through an association rapidly, there are fewer postponements in efficiency. Laborers are less inclined to stop their tasks or request later due dates since they get opportune choices and correspondence from their administration. That has a positive effect on the workplace, which prompts progressively precise work and predictable creation (BG)
Reduces employee stress: Although a despotic pioneer can have a testing identity, most representatives want to work in a domain where there are clear desires set for them. Indeed, even specialists who like to investigate innovative arrangements wouldn't fret a totalitarian head when they can pitch new thoughts or offer an elective choice dependent on their involvement. Toward the day's end, the totalitarian chief resembles the skipper of a ship: each choice is a load on their shoulders, and they are at last in charge of what occurs.
Situations where Autocratic Leadership works best:
Individuals with low inspiration or accomplishment introduction will in general work as meager as could be expected under the circumstances, and when working in a gathering, will in general pass on work to other people. An imperious pioneer who doles out clear and exact obligations guarantees that such specialists work their offer (BBP).
Numerous individuals working in a gathering come up short on the tendency to comprehend the complexities of the venture and feel hesitant to assume liability if things turn out badly. Aggregate or participative basic leadership in such cases will in general postpone advance. A despotic pioneer enabled to settle on choices allot errands and expectations to workers and keep the task on the calendar (BBP).
Autocratic Leadership styles suit most blue-caught laborers, particularly those doing incompetent employments who come up short on the capabilities, aptitudes, or ability to react to any participative initiative styles, or have low inspiration or require accomplishment acknowledgment to perform (BBP).
Disadvantages of the Autocratic Leadership Style:
Leads to Micromanagement: As the pioneer's notoriety is hanging in the balance in each undertaking. Those in this kind of position will in general regulate each little detail of the work being finished. Numerous totalitarian chiefs transform into extreme micromanagers, making it troublesome for laborers to carry out their responsibilities since they're constantly compelled to provide details regarding what they are doing at some random minute. At the point when this occurs, profitability levels will in general decline after some time rather than increment.
It does not offer a sense of professional ownership: Imperious pioneers frequently make this reality realize that they are in control. That implies specialists tend to not take responsibility for what they do because there is no motivator to do so. They neither get faulted if they come up short nor get credit when they succeed. After some time, it prompts a devaluation in worker's commitment (BG).
It creates a system of dependence: Representatives are compelled to depend on the autocratic chief for all their input, guidelines, and work obligations. On the off chance that they confront a choice in the work they are doing, they are nearly compelled to go to the pioneer for counsel on what to do as opposed to settling on the choice all alone. That makes it practically outlandish for pioneers to leave the work environment, as specialists can turn out to be so reliant on their basic leadership capacities that nothing is completed if the pioneer is absent for reasons unknown (BG).
References
- Brandongallie Website(ND): 11 Autocratic Leadership Advantages and Disadvantages, Retrieved January 24, 2019 from https://brandongaille.com/11-autocratic-leadership-advantages-and-disadvantages/
- BBP: When to use Autocratic Leadership, Retrieved January 24, 2019, from https://www.brighthubpm.com/resource-management/75686-examples-of-when-to-use-autocratic-leadership/
- SBC: Retrieved January 24, 2019 from https://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-autocratic-leadership-style-2980.htm
- PT: Leadership, Retrieved January 24, 2019, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/basics/leadership
Stuck on your essay?
