Australia's Gross Domestic Product: Development and Diversity

Gross domestic product (GDP) gauges a nation's financial exhibition over a given period, commonly one year or one quarter. Thus, estimating the economy of the nation is the most significant monetary measure. This paper investigates the development and diversity of Australia's gross domestic product.

Australia’s Growth Decade

As indicated by the report by Aslani et al. (2017), the growth rate of Australia's gross domestic product was 2.8%, with a gross domestic product of US$734.283 million. In 2005, it was predicted that the Australian economy would perform better than expected in 2006, as evidenced by solid financial performance (Aslani et al., 2017). According to forecasters, in 2006 Australia's gross domestic product grew at a rate of 3.8%, with a per capita gross domestic product of US$37,869. The increase in wages per capita for Australians has caused a change in the lifestyles of people living in the economy. The gross domestic product indicated a comparable upward pattern till the year 2008. Till the year 2008, the normal gross domestic product development pace of the Australian economy was comparable to 3.4% (Parker et al., 2016). In any case, in the year 2009 the economy saw worldwide money-related emergency. Because of which, the economy confronted downturn and the development pace of the Australian gross domestic product was diminished to 1.6%. The report by Chime and Hindmoor (2019), expressed that Australian economy demonstrated extraordinary strength to the worldwide money-related emergency, and got one of only a handful hardly any nations that had the option to convey positive development even in the time of emergency (Ringer and Hindmoor, 2019). For the following three years, i.e., from 2010-2013, the normal gross domestic product development pace of the Australian economy was comparable to 2.7%. In the year 2014, the development pace of gross domestic product diminished to 2.3%, and the supreme estimation of gross domestic product additionally decreased when contrasted with the earlier years (Cantore et al., 2017). One of the main reasons of the lull in the development rate was the diminished profitability gains in the economy. The development pace of the economy somewhat expanded to 3.25% in the time of 2016, however dropped again to 2.4% in the year 2017.

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

Place an order

Australia’s Growth Variation

It very well may be broken down from the transient developments in the Australian economy that the economy saw monetary extension beginning from the year 1970s. After this period, the normal gross domestic product development of the Australian economy was proportional to 3.7 percent, which was lower when contrasted with the gross domestic product development pace of the economy in the extension stage. In the year 2005 the Australian economy was encountering a period of current development, when the gross domestic product development pace of the economy was comparable to 2.8% (Robinson et al., 2015). In the year the oil costs were expanding in the economy alongside the expanding request of mechanical products by the Chinese economy. The expansion in the interest of modern merchandise additionally made an upward weight on the product costs in the Australian economy. The expansion in the item costs helped in expanding the terms of exchange of the economy by 30 percent. The expansion in the terms of exchange of the Australian economy further aided in expanding per capita salary of the purchaser which expanded the spending rate in the Australian economy. The improvement in the terms of exchange of the Australian economy led to an expansion in the development pace of economy by 3.8% in the year 2006 (Williams et al., 2017). In 2006, the organizations in the economy demonstrated solid money-related development and demonstrated positive speculation development.

The ideal conditions in the economy expanded the benefit of the associations, which further expanded the asset limit use in the economy. Alongside the corporate development, the Australian economy was additionally seeing a positive development in the offer market, which further quickened the monetary development of Australia. The offer costs expanded at higher rates when contrasted with the earlier years. The positive presentation of the financial markers prompts an expansion in the gross domestic product development pace of the economy by 3.8%. Till the year 2008, the normal gross domestic product development pace of the Australian economy was comparable to 3.4% (Charlton, 2019). It has been said that the development in the gross domestic product pace of the Australian economy was led by the asset segment.

The year 2009 denoted the development of worldwide money-related emergency, which prompted a decline on the planet yield kevel by 1.1 percent. The market analyst express that Australian economy had the option to successfully adapt up to the money-related emergency and had the option to convey positive financial development dissimilar to different economies. The main reason of the positive development of the economy was effective presentation of the monetary arrangement of the economy. The economy saw a ruin in the business rate because of decrease in the yield level was as yet ready to develop superior to the next cutting-edge economies because of its solid money-related market (Charlton, 2019). The financial and money-related strategies in light of the emergency looked by the economy helped the economy in managing the negative effects of the downturn. One of the strategic moves made by the Australian economy because of the emergency was the adaptability in its swapping scale.

Nonetheless, the decrease in the work level and acquiring intensity of the individuals living in the Australian economy prompted sharp diminishing in the offer market and gainfulness of the associations in the market. The money-related foundations likewise saw a sharp lessening in their offer costs, which prompted their breakdown (Pandya and Sisombat, 2017) The negative exhibition of the monetary markers prompted a sharp diminishing in the development pace of the economy. The development pace of the Australian gross domestic product was diminished to 1.6% in the year 2009. In accordance with the expectations, the development pace of the Australian economy somewhat expanded in the final quarter of the monetary year of 2010. Be that as it may, it was foreseen that the development pace of the Australian economy would not have the option to show an upward development rate in the initial barely any months of the year 2011. For the following three years, for example from 2010-2013, the normal gross domestic product development pace of the Australian economy was identical to 2.7%. In this period, the economy was recuperating from the impacts of the worldwide monetary emergency. The local interest in the Australian economy upheld the development pace of the economy in this period. There was an expansion in the fare add up to the Asian nations in this period that aided in expanding the development pace of the Australian economy (Courvisanos et al., 2016). The expansion in the generation limit of coal and iron in these years helped in expanding the Australian fares which further aided in expanding the yield development and work level in the economy. Be that as it may, the Australian economy saw a change in this period. Prior, the assembling business of the Australian business was viewed as biggest industry of the Australian economy (Nelson et al., 2019). Be that as it may, the yield development pace of the assembling business of the Australian economy decreased, and along these lines preceding the emergency the budgetary area of the Australian economy was viewed as the biggest business of the Australian economy.

The development pace of the Australian economy again decreased in the year 2014. The financial analysts express that the Australian economy was experiencing significant change stage in the year 2014. It was said that the economy was in a change stage, in light of the fact that the economy was developing at a moderate pace. In any case, a portion of the significant advancements occurred in the Australian economy that aided in the asset blast in the economy. In this asset blast, the yield creation of the economy expanded, which further aided in the expanding the fares development in the economy. This fares development positively affected the general development of the economy (Charlton, 2019). As indicated by the estimates made by the market analysts it was foreseen that the gross domestic product development rate in the year 2014 will be like the development rate in the earlier year of 2013. In the year 2014, the development pace of gross domestic product decreased to 2.3%, and the total estimation of gross domestic product likewise diminished when contrasted with the earlier year. At that point the gross domestic product development pace of the Australian economy somewhat expanded to 2.8% in the year 2015 (Reid and Coiacetto, 2017). A comparative development rate was seen by the Australian economy in the year 2016. One of the fundamental reasons of the stable monetary development of the economy was the commitment done by the farming division of the economy.

The development in the farming yield helped in giving a lift to the administration area of the economy, that together aided in expanding the pay levels and the buying intensity of the whole economy in general. The expansion in the buying intensity of the families helped in expanding the family unit utilization in the economy in the year 2017, which helped in quickening the gross fixed capital development in the following years (Borio et al., 2017).

The general customer certainty expanded in the economy alongside the well-being of the money-related organizations of the economy. In any case, it was assessed that in this period the pay levels in the economy were low, and thusly the purchasers in the economy saw value pressures.

The value pressures and the low pay development prompted a frail gross domestic product development pace of the Australian economy; the gross domestic product development pace of the Australian economy dropped again to 2.4% in the year 2017 (Pham et al., 2017).

Challenges Australia Faces with Future Growth

One of the main challenges that the Australian economy is managing is that the family unit utilization in the economy has diminished and the sparing proportion per family has expanded. The decrease in the interest levels in the market is adversely affecting the gainfulness of the associations, which further has a negative relationship with the general monetary development of Australia (Dungey et al., 2016). Taking a gander at the present interest levels in the economy the organizations are feeling beneficiary to put resources into the economy, which really decreases the remote direct interests in the economy. In light of this test, the legislature has chosen to pick monetary combination so as to additionally fortify the money-related establishments of the economy. The improvement in the budgetary organizations of the economy will help in expanding the trust of the shoppers in the economy, which will in the long run help in expanding the pace of utilization and use by the clients in the market (Greasley et al., 2017). Another explanation of the low spending of the Australian family units is the low compensation development rates and the low per capita salary of the person. The low per capita pay decreases the buying intensity of the individuals living in the economy prompting delicate household spending in the Australian economy (Reid and Coiacetto, 2017). As indicated by the measurements, the family units have not seen any expansion in their per capita pay throughout the previous three years.

Another test that the Australian economy is managing powerless budgetary framework. It gets significant for the economy to chip away at its nature of money-related administrations and receive compelling prudential oversight. During the worldwide money-related emergency, the Australia economy saw a breakdown of a presumed insurance agency, which demonstrated that there is have to fabricate a solid budgetary administrative framework so as to viably keep up the obligation level of the economy and high venture rate by the business organizations. Careless conduct was seen from the financial structure of the Australian economy, which prompted numerous poor speculations and over the top obtaining in the economy (Fotis et al., 2017). In this way, the frail prudential administrative arrangement of the Australian economy is one of the significant difficulties saw by the Australian economy. Australia needs to reinforce its strategy design and embrace budgetary change process so as to guarantee sufficient obligation levels and proper venture level in the economy (Stanford et al., 2018). The supervisions over the financial activities can be expanded and loaning conduct can be checked so as to build the security of the money-related arrangement of the economy.

Another test that the Australian economy is managing is high extent of matured populace. This demonstrates the working populace is less in the economy so as to fulfill the developing need for wares in the market. Throughout the years, the profitability has additionally diminished in the Australian economy. Hence, so as to repay the accessibility of less working individuals in the economy it gets significant for the Australian economy to embrace innovation so as to expand the efficiency for satisfying the need levels in the market.

Conclusion

The development of the gross domestic product is generally considered as the most important indicator for assessing the country's monetary status. The rate of real change in GDP is called monetary development and is the best indicator of the economy's highs and lows. This paper examines the growth rate of Australia's gross domestic product, primarily considering the various variables that caused the growth rate to fluctuate between 2006 and 2017.

References

1. Aslani, A., Rezaee, M., & Mortazavi, S. M. (2017). Analysis of the Robustness of Australia Economy and Energy Supply/Demand Fluctuation. Present Environment and Sustainable Development, 11(2), 35-48.
2. Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2019). Avoiding the Global Financial Crisis in Australia: A Policy Success? Successful Public Policy, 279.
3. Borio, C., Gambacorta, L., & Hofmann, B. (2017). The Influence of Monetary Policy on Bank Profitability. International Finance, 20(1), 48-63.
4. Cantore, N., Clara, M., Lavopa, A., & Soare, C. (2017). Manufacturing as an Engine of Growth: Which Is the Best Fuel? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 42, 56-66.
5. Charlton, A. (2019). Fiscal Policy in Extraordinary Times: A Perspective from Australia’s Experience in the Global Recession. Economic Analysis and Policy, 64, 83-90.
6. Courvisanos, J., Jain, A., & K. Mardaneh, K. (2016). Economic Resilience of Regions Under Crises: A study of the Australian Economy. Regional Studies, 50(4), 629-643.
7. Dungey, M., Matei, M., Luciani, M., & Veredas, D. (2017). Surfing Through the GFC: Systemic Risk in Australia. Economic Record, 93(300), 1-19.
8. Fotis, P., Karkalakos, S., & Asteriou, D. (2017). The Relationship Between Energy Demand and Real GDP Growth Rate: The Role of Price Asymmetries and Spatial Externalities Within 34 Countries Across the Globe. Energy Economics, 66, 69-84.
9. Greasley, D., McLaughlin, E., Hanley, N., & Oxley, L. (2017). Australia: A Land of Missed Opportunities? Environment and Development Economics, 22(6), 674-698.
10. Nelson, T., McCracken-Hewson, E., Sundstrom, G., & Hawthorne, M. (2019). The Drivers of Energy-Related Financial Hardship in Australia–Understanding the Role of Income, Consumption and Housing. Energy policy, 124, 262-271.
11. Pandya, V., & Sisombat, S. (2017). Impacts of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Australian Economy. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(5), 121-131.
12. Parker, P. D., Jerrim, J., & Anders, J. (2016). What Effect Did the Global Financial Crisis Have Upon Youth Wellbeing? Evidence from Four Australian Cohorts. Developmental psychology, 52(4), 640.
13. Pham, T. D., Nghiem, S., & Dwyer, L. (2017). The Determinants of Chinese Visitors to Australia: A Dynamic Demand Analysis. Tourism Management, 63, 268-276.
14. Reid, S., & Coiacetto, E. (2017). Legislative Policy Environment as Facilitator of Foreign Residential Investment in Australia. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 23(3), 303-320.
15. Robinson, T., Tsiaplias, S., & Nguyen, V. H. (2015). The Australian Economy in 2014–15: An Economy in Transition. Australian Economic Review, 48(1), 1-14.
16. Stanford, J., Hardy, T., & Stewart, A. (2018). Australia We Have a Problem. The Wages Crisis in Australia: What it Is and What to Do About It, 3-20. Urban studies, 53(8), 1542-1558.