In the critical analysis, the formation of the writing will be directed by how I analyzed my country and how throughout the semester made statements on how Peru is a democratic institution and how it has grown over the years in terms of development, the concern of overpopulation with so many Venezuelan migrants going into the country for being an open-door policy for accepting so many migrants, the string of corruption due to bad presidents that were in power in its time but overthrown them. This is the fundamental basis of Peru, but in the Pre-Reflection, the assignment goes into more depth on things for Peru. This includes their religion, how they are dominated in a machismo society, and if there are internal or external conflicts that are taking place in Peru today, Luckily but unfortunately Peru does have some violence and that is an abuse of women and children This abuse goes into detail from physical to mental abuse. These are the analyses I have seen and researched for Peru because when I went to Peru seeing it face to face is more impacting than reading it in an article. Of course, there are some structural readings and intense understandings that you need to do in order to understand further details on why thing these problems are being formed and why people live in these predicaments. In the reading on migration and globalization, the forces driving global migration, and current sociology.
In my reactions toward the film “The Land Between” I saw that these young men want to find a way to escape poverty and live a better life for not just their families, but themselves too. You can see that they are not living a comfortable life and are suffering a lot. To be honest it does look hard to comprehend how fighting for a better life is very hard especially if you do not know what can happen next. From the video, they are living in tents and in a bushy area that is inhabited by dogs and dirt and these young men are just trying their best to make it as much comfortable as they can. This reminds me of the weekly video that we saw in week two on human rights how migration works and how people come and go voluntarily or involuntarily. These men unfortunately left over fear of being in poverty even more, but the hardships of going to jail, being deported, or worse robbed or killed are very real for them and I find this very sad to watch. They are trying so hard but is just so hard for them to prosper from all these setbacks that a lot of countries cannot provide for them in terms of jobs, shelter, and education for the migrants to survive or have a decent understanding of how to move on from this poverty that they are living with.
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
With the complexities of the topic designated in the reflection of the film and the country of my concern, there are similar and contrasting parts of the dynamic of the situation. Now, of course, Peru is not that hard on migrants who want to come into the country and try hard to provide every migrant with a workable solution. For example, in the article ESRI, they tell the story in detail of how corruption and poverty on immigration are a thing and how they are resolving it little by little. Peru is becoming a country of immigrants: of hope and prosperity, rather than a country of emigrants: of fear, poverty, and injustice. Corruption is being punished and the countries urbanizing so the countries' economies can improve to have the unemployment rate down. Peru has a lot of benefits when it comes to migration problems and has its own deputies on what is the difference between Immigration and migration, to begin with. It has been stated that there is a 12.1% increase in foreign visa work that was granted in Peru alone. Meaning that more migrants were entering the country in search of jobs, hoping that Peru would offer them something better. Now here is where you see a huge contrast when it comes to inequality and migrations from the film and my country of choice. Unlike Peru, some other countries do not have the benefit of overthrowing the president if they have done any corruption in the government that could have hurt their country in general. Unfortunately, in the film, you can see these African migrants do not have that opportunity because Morocco depicted in the film is not a friendly migrant country to be with because you can see the government does not supply resources, shelter, or job work for these migrants to begin with. From the article on S. Castles on page 126 on equality it clearly states. Yet the claim of reducing inequality was the main element of political legitimation because it underpinned the principles of ‘open borders’ and level playing field’. Flows across borders - commodities, capital, technology, and labor -were meant to secure the optimal allocation of resources and to ensure that production factors could be obtained at the lowest possible cost. Now you can see that poverty is the key ingredient for migration and can cause a lot of setbacks for them to have a better life in where they want to be. Another fact on migrations from what the reading made me understand the similarities and differences that made me understand in the film and Peru was in the article in Sociological of Migration. He states that Theories of international migration can be broadly classified as macro and micro in their level of analysis. In the part of the State Security and Human Security part on page 127 of the Journal of Intercultural Studies, the author goes into greater detail on how poverty goes into action. The securitization of migration and ethnic minorities is based on a perspective that emphasizes the security of rich northern states and their populations while ignoring the reality that migration and refugee flows are often the result of the fundamental lack of human security in many poorer countries. Such insecurity - which finds its expression in poverty, hunger, violence, and lack of human rights - is not in any way a natural condition but is a result of past practices of colonization and more recent economic and political power structures, which have exacerbated inequality in many places. These two articles helped me understand even further how this can impact an economic side as well.
In conclusion, there has been some outstanding deeper understanding of why migration comes into play in other countries and the hardships they must encounter in that process. Unfortunately, not a lot of countries do not have enough resources to provide accommodation to the migrants that come into that country. This is where poverty and the economy come into play and set a huge setback for the development of that country and the people that live in it.
Stuck on your essay?
