Why Euthanasia Should Not Be Legal

Topics:
Words:
923
Pages:
2
This essay sample was donated by a student to help the academic community. Papers provided by EduBirdie writers usually outdo students' samples.
Updated:
07.01.2025

Cite this essay cite-image

Introduction

Euthanasia, often referred to as "mercy killing," involves the intentional act of ending a person's life to alleviate intractable suffering. This topic has sparked intense ethical, moral, and legal debates worldwide. While the argument for euthanasia centers around the right to die with dignity, a closer examination reveals a myriad of complexities that challenge the notion of legalizing this practice. This essay contends that euthanasia should not be legalized due to potential abuses, the sanctity of life, and the slippery slope that may compromise societal values. By analyzing these concerns, we aim to understand why the legalization of euthanasia could lead to more harm than good, ultimately affecting vulnerable populations and the fundamental principles of medical ethics.

Potential for Abuse and Exploitation

One of the primary arguments against the legalization of euthanasia is the potential for abuse and exploitation of vulnerable individuals. Critics argue that legal euthanasia can lead to situations where individuals who are not truly consenting or are unable to make autonomous decisions are pressured into ending their lives. This concern is particularly pronounced among the elderly, disabled, and mentally ill, who may feel coerced by family members or healthcare providers who view them as burdensome. In countries where euthanasia is legal, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, reports have surfaced of patients being euthanized without explicit consent, raising ethical alarms about the practice.

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
  • Proper editing and formatting
  • Free revision, title page, and bibliography
  • Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
Place an order
document

Furthermore, the legalization of euthanasia could inadvertently lead to a devaluation of life, particularly for those with chronic illnesses or disabilities. As noted by Dr. Herbert Hendin, a prominent psychiatrist and euthanasia opponent, "Legalization could encourage a societal climate where the lives of the disabled are deemed less worthy, potentially leading to subtle forms of coercion." The fear of being perceived as a burden may drive individuals to opt for euthanasia, even when palliative care options are available. This highlights the ethical dilemma of balancing individual autonomy with the potential for societal pressure and exploitation.

Transitioning to the next argument, it is crucial to consider the sanctity of life principle, which forms the cornerstone of many ethical, religious, and philosophical traditions. This principle not only underscores the intrinsic value of human life but also challenges the moral acceptability of euthanasia as a legal practice.

The Sanctity of Life and Ethical Concerns

The sanctity of life is a concept deeply rooted in various religious, ethical, and philosophical traditions, asserting that life is inherently valuable and should be protected. Legalizing euthanasia directly challenges this principle by positing that certain lives are less worth preserving than others, particularly when they involve suffering or diminished quality of life. Many religious doctrines, including Christianity and Islam, oppose euthanasia on the grounds that it violates the divine prerogative over life and death. For instance, the Catechism of the Catholic Church states, "We are stewards, not owners, of the life God has entrusted to us. It is not ours to dispose of."

From an ethical standpoint, the Hippocratic Oath, a foundational element of medical practice, emphasizes the physician's role in preserving life. Euthanasia blurs the line between healing and harming, challenging the ethical duties of healthcare professionals. The American Medical Association (AMA) maintains that "euthanasia is fundamentally incompatible with the physician's role as healer." Legalizing euthanasia could erode trust in the medical profession, as patients may fear that doctors could prioritize ending life over preserving it.

Transitioning to the final argument, the slippery slope phenomenon is a significant concern, suggesting that once euthanasia is legalized, its application could extend beyond the initially intended scope, potentially leading to widespread ethical violations and societal harm.

The Slippery Slope and Societal Impact

The slippery slope argument posits that legalizing euthanasia could lead to unintended expansions of the practice, undermining ethical standards and posing significant risks to society. Critics fear that the criteria for euthanasia could gradually broaden, encompassing individuals who are not terminally ill or who suffer from non-physical ailments, such as depression. This phenomenon has been observed in Belgium, where euthanasia is now available for psychiatric patients, raising concerns about the adequacy of safeguards intended to protect vulnerable individuals.

Moreover, the societal impact of legalizing euthanasia could include a shift in how life and death are perceived. The normalization of euthanasia may lead to a cultural acceptance of death as a solution to suffering, rather than investing in palliative care and mental health resources. This potential shift could undermine efforts to improve end-of-life care and support systems for those with chronic illnesses or disabilities. As noted by ethicist Wesley J. Smith, "Legalized euthanasia sends a message that some lives are not worth living, potentially influencing the attitudes of healthcare providers and society at large."

As we conclude this discussion, it is imperative to reflect on the broader implications of legalizing euthanasia and the importance of preserving ethical standards that safeguard human dignity and the intrinsic value of life.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while the arguments in favor of euthanasia focus on individual autonomy and the right to die with dignity, the potential risks and ethical dilemmas associated with its legalization cannot be overlooked. The potential for abuse, the challenge to the sanctity of life, and the slippery slope phenomenon all present significant concerns that underscore the need for caution in legalizing euthanasia. Instead of embracing euthanasia as a solution to suffering, societies should prioritize enhancing palliative care, supporting vulnerable populations, and upholding ethical standards that respect the intrinsic value of human life. By doing so, we can ensure that the dignity and sanctity of life are preserved, even in the face of terminal illness and suffering.

Make sure you submit a unique essay

Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Cite this paper

Why Euthanasia Should Not Be Legal. (2024, December 27). Edubirdie. Retrieved February 17, 2025, from https://edubirdie.com/examples/why-euthanasia-should-not-be-legal/
“Why Euthanasia Should Not Be Legal.” Edubirdie, 27 Dec. 2024, edubirdie.com/examples/why-euthanasia-should-not-be-legal/
Why Euthanasia Should Not Be Legal. [online]. Available at: <https://edubirdie.com/examples/why-euthanasia-should-not-be-legal/> [Accessed 17 Feb. 2025].
Why Euthanasia Should Not Be Legal [Internet]. Edubirdie. 2024 Dec 27 [cited 2025 Feb 17]. Available from: https://edubirdie.com/examples/why-euthanasia-should-not-be-legal/
copy

Join our 150k of happy users

  • Get original paper written according to your instructions
  • Save time for what matters most
Place an order

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via support@edubirdie.com.

Check it out!
close
search Stuck on your essay?

We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.