The candidate with the most votes wins a riding, and a coalition will be formed by the party to win most ridings. The prime minister is not directly elected; rather, the leader of the winning party will take the top position (Kestler 1). Six rival Parties are all trying to achieve the same common goal, which is to become the next government in power. I live in Sage Creek, Winnipeg, Manitoba, my drive is the Constituency of St. Boniface. The two parties that have caught my attention the most are the Liberals and the Conservatives. I will describe Justin Trudeau, who is a candidate for Prime Minister with the Liberal Party of Canada, who promotes the benefits of working citizens and seeks to raise Canada's minimum wage. In contrast to the child benefits, the working parents need and will through. Below the higher position of Prime Minister, I'm going to talk more about Dan Vandal. Who's got a c. Who will share ideas with his group, but more or less concentrate on his family, as well as helping parents better manage child care and accessibility. Along with a middle-class tax benefit that will further improve the neighborhoods in Manitoba. Andrew Scheer, along with the Conservative Party, is the leader to reform immigration policies and boundaries, and also to remove the carbon tax. As the MP for St. Boniface, Réjeanne Caron will reflect on the public safety of her city, beginning with a tax credit bus incentive that much of Manitoba would enjoy, along with the removal of GST on home energy. Several announcements have been made along the lines of this year's campaign.
The Prime Minister of Canada is the head of the elected government which is normally for a four-year duration. When elected, he/she becomes the principal minister of the country. In this year's federal election, there is an ongoing debate on who will succeed in becoming the next Prime Minister. In the running for this position, we have Andrew Scheer, from the Conservative Party of Canada, and Justin Trudeau, from the Liberal Party of Canada (Tasker 2). Both are very popular political leaders with a lot of experience, however only one can be elected by Canadians. Justin Pierre James Trudeau (Parliamentary member) is a Canadian politician who serves as Canada's 23rd and incumbent leader. Since 2015, he has held this position and has been Liberal Party leader since 2016. Justin Trudeau spent his early years in the media as the child of Pierre Trudeau the popular Canadian prime minister. Growing up as a Canadian icon with his father, Justin learned how to ‘live and breathe’ a Liberal mindedness. Justin has promised many major changes to the government and the environment of Canada in his 2019 plan to win (Harris1).
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
Trudeau’s list of promises to gain voters includes eliminating the fee merchants pay to credit-card companies on every transaction, reducing the cost of federal incorporations, eliminating the federal business advisory services fee, and aiding small businesses by creating a voluntary payroll system to automate records (Lim 3). Trudeau’s campaign includes implementing a pilot project to give up to $50,000 to as many as 2,000 new businesses, to help them start up their companies. He also wants to include giving $250 to entrepreneurs to create a website. The Liberals estimate these above actions would cost the federal treasury $129 million next year, with it increasing to $163 million in 2023-24. Major credit card companies will be affected by this change and, in turn, it can force them to revoke offered reward programs linked to their cards (Bloomberg 4).
As part of their platform, the Liberals are also promising to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 and employment insurance sickness benefits to 26 weeks from 15 weeks. This gives an advantage to all lower-income citizens living paycheck by paycheck. In 2017, t3.4 million Canadians were living below the poverty line, or 9.5 percent of the population, down from 10.6 percent in 2016. An employee who earns $7.20 an hour minimum wage would be below the poverty line. All adults would need to perform minimum wage jobs in a Canadian family to live above the level of poverty (Grabish 2). On the other hand, to be above the level, a single person must earn $12,140 a year, or $5.83 an hour. As a consequence of Trudeau’s plan, employers with tight budgets may have to lay off employees to maintain their budget. Companies may pass on the cost of higher wages to consumers with price increases known as the 'scale effect.' This would lift living costs and establish a need for further rises in minimum wages.
The Liberals do pledge to raise the Canada Child Benefit if re-elected and to tax-free maternal and parental leave benefits. EI premiums were known for pregnancy or maternal income. To apply, during the 52 weeks before filing your statement, you must have earned at least 600 hours of insurable work (Canada 2). In the first few months of parenting a baby, parents usually struggle with sleep deprivation and loss in work hours. Trudeau is promising to increase the child benefit to 15%, which, in turn, would give $1000 to some families with newborn children. This would also grant new measures that will help LGBTQ become eligible for parental leave benefits. For the average family, Trudeau said that this would amount to an extra $7000 claiming the proposed new leave (Gale 7). Although business owners will likely have to fit that bill. Canadians may take advantage of this benefit and put pressure on the Canadian System, knowing that this will be available to all families. It may also cause undue financial stress on the Canadian government, which may encourage parents to stay at home and not join the workforce.
Andrew Scheer is in the running for the Conservative Party, also known as the ‘Tories’. Sheer is a Canadian politician serving as a Member of Parliament for the riding of Regina. Since 2017, he has been president of the Conservative Party and a member of the Official Opposition. Andrew Scheer is proposing some changes to carbon tax and immigration laws, but his most insightful pledge to the Canadian media was to bring change to immigration (Scheer 2). He claims that he would close the gap in the' Free Third Country Treaty' between Canada and the United States. It also offers increased language training, greater consideration of job skills, and a refocusing of the government-sponsored refugee program on survivors of violence vs. arriving, first served. Thanks to the increase in irregular migrants, Canadians have lost confidence in the fairness of the immigration system. Creating an unpredictable rate of immigrants taking advantage of these entries and becoming illegal immigrants (Lum 2). Although this sounds like a great idea and can solve Canada’s immigration system problems, this will cost a fortune for the government to pay, either leading to a tax increase a decrease in tax returns, or other cuts to benefits provided by the Canadian government. Like all advancements in security and technology, it comes with a price, and Canada might not be ready for this money, tax, and security overhaul.
Andrew Scheer has called the Liberals’ carbon tax ineffective and has advised he would repeal it. The Conservative party would leave it to the provinces to decide if they want to put a price on carbon. The average price of gasoline is $1.38, which has increased by 4.4 cents since the carbon tax was imposed. Carbon taxes make fossil fuel prices increase and impose a harsher burden on those living in low-income situations. They will pay a higher percentage of their income for essentials like gas, electricity, and groceries. This will most likely call for a carbon tax rule that reflects each company or individual’s ability to pay (Thompson 4). With the carbon tax causing increases in business overheads, companies will be prompted to find more efficient ways to manufacture their products or deliver their services. The carbon tax’s purpose is to make sure that companies that emit large amounts of carbon dioxide will reduce, and if not eliminate their emissions. According to a 2011 report by the Congressional Budget Office, “A $20 per ton carbon tax would raise nearly $1.2 trillion over the next decade. This means that there would be plenty of opportunities to produce green energy. Green energy will address the need for sustainable and less damaging power sources, and that a growing green movement that would be beneficial to society would be promoted”(LLeviticus6). Andrew Scheer has promised to remove the carbon tax, and better secure Canada’s immigration laws and borders.
The pecking order below the position of Prime Minister is vast. There are many MPs for each Party. In my riding of St. Boniface, six MPs are running, the two I will be focusing are are in the same parties as the prime ministers I researched. Dan Vandal, with the Liberal Party of Canada, and Réjeanne Caron with the Conservative Party of Canada. Rejeanne Caron is a Francophone Metis women. She is an active 25-year veteran of the Winnipeg Police Service. Also as an active community member, Caron currently sits on many boards and committees such as the board of The Bear Clan, and the Winnipeg Safe City Steering Committee in support of the UN Safe Cities global initiative to reduce sexual violence against women and girls. Caron focuses mainly on the security and public safety of her country. The proposed Green Public Transit Tax Credit is a 15 percent credit that would apply to the costs of weekly and monthly transit passes and frequently used electronic fare cards (Caron 4). The Parliamentary Budget Office says that the new credit will cost $229 million in 2020 and around $331 million by 2030. On an average weekday, Winnipeg Transit carries over 168,400 passengers. With this tax credit, many who seek to start using buses will receive a credit for using transit buses. This aids the community, not only by using tax credits saving people money and finding a cheaper and safer alternative than using cars which pollute the environment substantially, compared to busses which can hold a much larger capacity of people. New Canadian tests have revealed that modern diesel cars produce 10 times more toxic air pollution than heavy trucks and buses. However, buses and trucks have larger engines and burn more diesel per kilometer, meaning that cars produce 10 times more pollution. Exhaust and chemical pollution is only one item for Réjeanne Caron’s running for the Conservatives (Jaffe 2).
Another promise that Réjeanne Caron has made to Manitobans is taking the tax off home energy. This will return around 92.78 dollars to all households per year. The average home energy bill in Manitoba costs $111.67 per month. Being taxed on what you already pay for your household is unnecessary. The government is taking money that doesn’t belong to them and should either go back into the pockets of Manitoba Hydro or return it to the customer. One deficiency of the ‘no tax on home energy’ is that Manitoba Hydro will see an increase in the usage of electricity and other sources since the homeowners will be paying less, thinking that they can take advantage of their situation. This may cause more need for assistance and a higher demand for this utility, increasing the need for more jobs in the electrical system and power line workers across Manitoba (Giroux 11).
Dan Vandal, is a Métis politician in Winnipeg, MB. He represented St. Boniface on the Winnipeg City Council from 1995 to 2004 and from 2006 to 2014, and ran unsuccessfully for Mayor of Winnipeg in 2004, coming in second place to Sam Katz. Dan Vandal is another candidate of the Liberal Party of Canada running as an MP for St. Boniface and St. Vital. Vandal and the Liberals promised that the government would create up to 250,000 more spaces for children in before and after-school childcare programs. Child care, otherwise known as daycare, is the care and supervision of a child or multiple children at a time. Almost half (46%) of parents reported using some type of childcare for their children aged 14 years and younger in the past year. Expanding the childcare capacity not only in communities but all over Canada is a ‘life saver’ for some parents who commute across the city to pick up their kids (Tsang 1). The constant denial of applicants and overcrowded care centers are creating a sense of disapproval from the parents now trying to find other ways of getting someone to watch their children. Many parents have had to stay home from work just to be able to drive and pick up their kids from school. Especially if they live far from the school which is now common with the overpopulation of some schools. An increase in available spots for childcare services will open a whole new opportunity for some parents to find a way of relief. Although in some cases the parents who use child care will take advantage and leave their children for longer periods. This places more need for staff and facilities for the child care services to comply with the new requirements (TaxTips 2). Not only have to take more children, but there will also have to be multiple buildings built, or leased, to meet the quota of 250,000 more available spots open for more children. This will put an incredible burden on the taxpayer. The average child day care costs around $211 a week for Manitoba Families. If there were to be advancements and more facilities built this would not only raise the price of care but place a higher standard of requirements the parents must meet to be accepted. In Canada, a family with a child under five with no special needs, no public assistance, and who is in daycare for at least eight hours a week spends an average of $5.31 per hour and $8,320 per year on childcare. This cost cuts a very large chunk of their annual income just for child care. If there were to be more facilities and availability hours, the price would never drop, and constantly rise. This would make it hard for lower and mmiddle-classcitizens to be able to afford childcare services.
Dan Vandal and the Liberals also promise that if re-elected, the Liberal government would make sure middle-class income earners won’t pay taxes on the first $15,000 of earnings. The median annual income in 2019 for a single person living in Canada is $33,000, and that number jumps to $92,700 for families with dual income between two working parents. “With this tax cut, we’ll lift about 40,000 people out of poverty, twice as many as the Conservative plan, and make life more affordable for Canadians.” The plan is expected to cost $2.9 billion in the first year, increasing to $5.6 billion in 2023-24 (Haslet 3).
Canadians will be faced with a big decision this year when it comes to the well-being of Families, Immigrants, Taxes, Daycare, and the Environment moving forward. The candidates all hold important, valuable, and debatable offerings to our citizens. I can’t wait to be able to vote. The right to vote, when I’m 18, will not be taken lightly. I have learned a lot of things about politics that I've never heard of before by reflecting on the data gathered. I will better prepare myself for this task when I can participate and use my ability to decide my future. Understanding why Parties develop their strategies and others creates a sense of transition, so change is good for an ever-growing nation like Canada. Looking at key ideas and pointing out the strategies and commitments of each Party, I realize that it is time for change and that Andrew Scheer and the Conservative Party should have the largest number of seats to secure this year's vote. For the main reasons that he approaches his proposals in a manner of consideration and care.
Stuck on your essay?
