Gerrymandering is the practice of “dividing an area” into “political units” which ultimately helps one political party (Merriam-Webster). However, these divisions are typically unfair and leave one political party at a disadvantage. The philosophy behind gerrymandering is to not give an overwhelming amount of safe seats to the person who is probable to win, but to give the opponent a number of safe seats. While the person who is probable to win will still likely win, the playing field is leveled out (Ingraham). This philosophy is rarely practiced, and instead, Congressional districts are drawn always favoring the person likely to win.
Gerrymandering is also everchanging. Politicians are allowed to select their voters rather than the voters to choose their representatives because of state legislatures being able to redraw state boundaries after every 10 years. In addition to this, computer programs are able to obtain detailed information on a voter’s location and political preferences by “cracking” and “packing” (Short). Cracking refers to “diluting the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts” whereas packing is “concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts” (“Gerrymandering”). Furthermore, the Supreme Court allows this practice ruled by the 1986 court case “Thornburg vs. Gingles.”
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
This court case stopped seven new voting districts that helped minority voters in North Carolina. Instead of giving power to minorities, the ruling created districts where minority voters were concentrated, which supports the packing of voters. Unfortunately, ending gerrymandering or resolving these issues are not simple. There are several ways to prevent the extent of gerrymandering, but each solution lacks aspects that are critical to the voting process, such as recognizing minorities or taking geography into account (Short).
However, if there is a solution to gerrymandering, it could potentially create less extreme partisans and help the amount of diversity in Congress. Gerrymandering also makes elections less competitive and the people in these districts would be more connected to their representative, as there would be less of a cultural divide and would hopefully represent the minorities better as well. This would ensure both populations to be represented more equally than in previous elections and each person would feel as if he or she could make a difference within the federal government.
Did you like this example?
Make sure you submit a unique essay
Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.
Cite this paper
-
APA
-
MLA
-
Harvard
-
Vancouver
General Overview of Gerrymandering: Analytical Essay.
(2022, September 27). Edubirdie. Retrieved December 31, 2024, from https://edubirdie.com/examples/general-overview-of-gerrymandering-analytical-essay/
“General Overview of Gerrymandering: Analytical Essay.” Edubirdie, 27 Sept. 2022, edubirdie.com/examples/general-overview-of-gerrymandering-analytical-essay/
General Overview of Gerrymandering: Analytical Essay. [online].
Available at: <https://edubirdie.com/examples/general-overview-of-gerrymandering-analytical-essay/> [Accessed 31 Dec. 2024].
General Overview of Gerrymandering: Analytical Essay [Internet]. Edubirdie.
2022 Sept 27 [cited 2024 Dec 31].
Available from: https://edubirdie.com/examples/general-overview-of-gerrymandering-analytical-essay/
copy
Stuck on your essay?
