Ag/chitosan coating enhances polyamide RO membranes

Topics:
Words:
2436
Pages:
5
This essay sample was donated by a student to help the academic community. Papers provided by EduBirdie writers usually outdo students' samples.

Cite this essay cite-image

Abstract

Silver/Chitosan nanodispersion (Ag/CS) prepared by gamma ray was used to modify the thin-film composite reverse osmosis (RO) membrane. The silver nitrate solutions were added to the chitosan solution with different concentrations of 5 to 20 (wt/wt %) and exposed to gamma radiation at different irradiation doses. The size of the silver/chitosan nanodispersion is investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The membranes characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscope (SEM) and contact angle measurement. Contact angle measurements showed that the surface hydrophilicity of the modified membranes increased by increasing Ag nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) concentration in prepared mixture. This study showed that the Ag-NPs which prepared with gamma technique enhance the permeability of the polyamide membrane. The water flux of the modified membranes, increased progressively at lower concentrations of nanoparticles (5–10 wt/wt%) and then decreased at 20 wt/wt%. Moreover, the modified membrane showed better antibacterial ability compared with the neat membrane. .

Introduction

Many efforts have been made to tackle the issue of water shortages. The best technique for desalination utilizing RO membrane and the uniform was more affordable whenever contrasted and customary warm desalination forms with high productivity moreover [1]. Membrane technology is considered as an alluring separation approach because of its efficiency and vitality sparing procedure and has been connected in water purification and softening, wastewater recovery, and food processing, etc. [2-4]. Reverse osmosis is currently a very much acknowledged system for water and wastewater treatment, [5] thanks to the improvement of high performance membranes with asymmetric structures, either fundamentally symmetric or as a thin-film composite, where a thin skin layer is supported on a microporous substrate [6]. The formation of thin-film composite (TFC) membranes from various polymeric or monomeric amines by interfacial polymerization has been contemplated widely [7-9]. The modification process of membrane surface has improved the efficiency of water treatment plants [10].

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
  • Proper editing and formatting
  • Free revision, title page, and bibliography
  • Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
Place an order
document

It is known from literatures that the separation performance of the thin-film composite membrane is strongly affected by the membrane surface properties (e.g. chemical structure and hydrophilicity) [11–14]. Therefore, a great deal of research efforts has been devoted to modifying the membrane surface properties so as to improve the membrane properties through surface modifications including physical and chemical treatments [15-19]. Accordingly, various works such as chemical coating, physical blending, plasma treatment, chemical reactions and polymer grafting have been carried out to modify the membranes [20, 21]. Adding inorganic nanoparticles to membrane matrix can enhance the membrane hydrophilicity, strength, permeability and selectivity characteristics [22, 23]

In the experiments, silver/Chitosan nanodispersion (Ag/CS) prepared by gamma ray was modified the TFC membrane. The membrane surface properties in terms of chemical structure, morphological structure and hydrophilicity were characterized by ATR-FTIR analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and contact angle measurement, respectively, to analyze the changes that resulted from the modification. The permeation properties of the neat and modified TFC polyamide reverse osmosis membranes were evaluated through cross-flow permeation tests by investigating the water flux and NaCl rejection.

Experimental section

Materials and reagents

Chitosan (Deacetylation 93%) was purchased from Oxford Lab Chem. Acetic acid, silver nitrate and isopropanol was obtained from El Nasr pharmaceutical, chemical Co. Egypt. A spiral-wound commercial RO membrane element was purchased to use the commercial thin-film composite polyamide (BW60-1892-75) DOW Company.

Preparation of modified membranes

Firstly, the commercial PA RO membrane samples were soaked in de ionized water for a minimum of 10 h, replacing the de ionized water every hour, and then rinsed thoroughly with de-ionized water to remove all preservative materials in the membranes. 400 mg of chitosan was dissolved in 200 mL of acetic acid solution (1 %) to prepared a 0.2 wt.% chitosan solution. Dissolve 40 mg in 100 mL distilled water Stir, slowly add silver nitrate solution into chitosan solution drop by drop and then add 2 ml isopropanol as free radical scavenger for hydroxyl radicals. The mixture is exposed to nitrogen gas for more than 1 h to remove the oxygen; the solution was irradiated under 60Co gamma ray with different irradiation doses. The surface modification of TFC membranes was achieved using the irradiated solutions via the rocker table for 30 min to obtain a uniform thickness layer. After that, the membrane was annealed for 15 min at 70º C. The modified membrane was thoroughly washed with deionized water to remove the residual solution, and then stored in deionized water for use.

Membrane Characterization

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was employed for analysis the surface composition of the neat and modified TFC polyamide RO membranes, respectively. The membrane tested samples for ATR-FTIR analysis were dried at 25℃ under vacuum before characterization. ATR-FTIR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Aratar 370 FTIR spectrometer with a ZnSe crystal as the internal refection element with an angle of incidence of 45°.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) estimations were performed with a JEOL, JEM 100CX, Japan, demonstrate the size of silver inside the prepare solusion. Finely grounded sample was dispersed in 10 ml distilled water followed by sonication to get a solution of metal nanoparticles. Approximately 20–25 µl of this solution was dropped on a 3 mm copper grid, drying at room temperature. The copper grid was thereafter inserted into transmission electron microscope

Surface morphologies of the composite membranes were observed by scanning electron microscopy of the membrane surface was examined with JEOL JSM-5400 scanning electron microscopy (Japan), available at NCRRT.

The hydrophilicity of the membranes was determined by the contact angle measured utilizing a DSA100 contact angle analyzer (KRUSS, Germany). All modified membrane samples and neat membrane were dried to remove the water in the TFC membranes and tested in at least three measurements.

Evaluation of membrane performance

The RO performance of polyamide/chitosan/silver (PA/CS/Ag) membrane was evaluated through estimating both reverse osmosis parameters; permeate flux (L/m2.h) and salt rejection (%). Permeate flux and salt rejection were estimated utilizing cross-flow filtration using different aqueous feed solutions containing different concentrations (ppm) of NaCl with a pH range 7± 0.4 at 25◦C. The permeate flux and salt rejection were evaluated from the cross-flow experiment M20. The permeation flux (J) through a membrane area (A) was calculated as the volume (Q) collected during a time period ∆t [24] from the Eq. (1): J = Q/ A. ∆t (1)

Also, the salt rejection (Rs %) was calculated by measuring the electric conductivity of both feed and permeate solutions using JENWAY Laboratory bench conductivity meter (4510) and calculated as follows using Eq. (2): Rs % = (Cf - Cp /Cf) x 100 (2)

Where Cf and Cp are the concentrations of the feed and permeate water, respectively.

Results and discussion

Characterization of membranes

The neat TFC membrane elucidate peak bands appeared indicating the PA barrier layer onto the PSF support layer. Two peak bands appear around 1597 and 1248 cm−1 for the C=O stretching vibration and C–N group of the amide II on TFC membrane, respectively [25]. The stretching peak at 3341–3473 cm−1 can be assigned to N–H and O–H which overlapped together [26, 27]. After modification the intensify percent of hydroxyl group decreases. The CONH2 absorption band is also observed at near 1650 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum. The shift was observed at 1705 cm−1 in the modified membrane with Ag nanodispersion. This shift may indicate the binding of Ag nanoparticles to N–H bond [28].

SEM is a powerful technique for studying the morphology of the different membranes and also it gives a reasonable image of the change in the surface morphology as a result of modifications. The surface of the neat polyamide membrane appears to slight changes were observed in SEM images between the original and modified membranes at 10 KGy. However, this structure became more porous and denser after modification with the modified solution prepared which exposed to gamma ray 20, 30 and 40 KGy. Those changes indicated that the membrane surface morphology was influenced by modification.

Hydrophilicity of the membranes

Contact angle examination is one among the essential parameters for deciding membrane surface charges and hydrophilic/hydrophobic characters that have excellent influence on membrane both water permeability and condition for fouling. While as contact angle becomes lower this suggests that the membrane surface turns to be more deliquescent because the water particles an excellent tendency to wet the surface layer. This, in turn, raises the membrane water flux [27].

The contact angle (θ) estimations of PA membrane and modified PA reverse osmosis membranes. The PA membrane demonstrates contact angle equals to 53° this indicates week membrane surface wettability with water and moderately hydrophilic properties. After surface modification, the hydrophilicity of modified membrane was enhanced, and it diminished to 36.3° this demonstrated the PA layer which be more polar and hydrophilic because the presence of chitosan and silver nanoparticles

Membrane performance

The main target of modification of the commercial RO membranes is to increase the salt rejection and water flux, which are the most important parameters that the authors work on them and also main reasons behind the intense development in this area.

Effect of AgNO3 concentration

For polyamide RO membrane, the salt rejection was about 84% at salinity 10000 ppm. The percentage increased with the increase of the silver nitrate concentrations, this due to formation of nano particles on membrane surface, which promotes the salt rejection. The salt rejection reached the largest percent at AgNO3 concentration of 10 (wt/wt).The water flux of PA membrane is 42 (l/m2.h). After modified with silver nanoparticles the flux increase reached to 48.5 (l/m2.h).

Effect of applied pressure

Performance of the PA and modified membrane, i.e. the permeation flux of the solution through the membrane and salt rejection, was carried out using a 10000 ppm aqueous NaCl solution as function of the operation pressure. The results of flux increase bit by bit as associate degree operative pressure will increase, and by the additional increase of the operation pressure, water flux will increase dramatically scrutiny with increase in salt rejection. It will process by the means that, permeate is directly reminiscent of the networking pressure and the matter diffusion across the membrane [25, 26].

Effect of irradiation doses

The performance of the modified membrane, i.e. the permeation flux of the solution through the membrane and salt rejection, was carried out using 0.2% chitosan concentration and AgNO3 10 (wt/wt) at 20 bar at different salinity as a function of the radiation doses. Generally, both the flux and the salt rejection increased with increasing dose up to 30 KGy. It was also found that modified membrane exhibited lower fluxes and rejection values at high irradiation doses. The lower flux may be related to the structural compactness of the PA membranes, resulting from the specific interaction between silver and PA matrix.

Fouling properties of membranes

Microorganisms, for example, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus effectively stick to film surfaces and develop as they assimilate supplements, for example, proteins and polysaccharides that accumulate on the membrane surface. The attached microorganisms excrete an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) and, thus, create a biofilm on the membrane surface (Hyoungwoo, et al., 2012). The membrane prompts natural obstruction on the membrane that causes flux decay.

The results show that the PA/CS/Ag modified membrane significantly reduced the number of viable E. coli and S. aureus cells by 90% and 83% respectively, which is higher than that of the commercial polyamide membrane which reduced it by 33% and 25%. Silver nanoparticles showed a high inactivation of bio-fouling on membrane surface [29]. These results can be attributed to a synergetic effect of the NPs materials, which have different approaches to bacterial inactivation.

Conclusions

Modified membranes were prepared by silver nano dispersion. The modified solution was prepared with gamma ray technique at different irradiation doses. The membrane showed a high hydrophilic surface, as the contact angle with water reached (~36.3°). The morphology of modified nanocomposite membrane also examined using FT-IR and SEM. Furthermore, water flux and a salt rejection for the resulted membranes were assessed, where performance of the newly modified membrane gave about 48.2 L m2h as a permeate water flux and a salt rejection of ≥95.5% was obtained for a saline water (10000 ppm of NaCl) at an applied pressure about 20 bars with a 14% increase in salt rejection comparing to the neat TFC membrane.

References

  1. Fritzmann, C., J. Löwenberg, T. Wintgens and T. Melin (2007). 'State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination.' Desalination 216(1-3): 1-76.
  2. R. Malaisamy, R. Mahendran, D. Mohan, M. Rajendran, V. Mohan, Cellulose acetate and sulfonated polysulfone blend ultrafiltration membranes. I. Preparation and characterization, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 86 (2002) 1749–1761.
  3. W. Zhang, G.H. He, P. Gao, G.H. Chen, Development and characterization of composite nanofiltration membranes and their application in concentration of antibiotics, Sep. Purif. Technol. 30 (2003) 27–35.
  4. S. Verissimo, K.V. Peinemann, J. Bordado, New composite hollow fiber membrane for nanofiltration, Desalination 184 (2005) 1–11.
  5. [R.J. Petersen, Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 83 (1993) 81–150.
  6. J. Jegal, S.-G. Min, K.-H. Lee, Factors affecting the interfacial polymerization of polyamide active layers for the formation of polyamide composite membranes, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 86 (2002) 2781–2787.
  7. Y. Zhou, S. Yu, M. Liu, H. Chen, C. Gao, Effect of mixed crosslinking agents on performance of thin-film-composite membranes, Desalination 192 (2006) 182–189.
  8. L. Li, S. Zhang, X. Zhang, G. Zheng, Polyamide thin film composite membranes prepared from 3,4∗,5-biphenyl triacyl chloride,3,3∗,5,5∗-biphenyl tetraacyl chlo- ride and m-phenylenediamine, J. Membr. Sci. 289 (2007) 258–267.
  9. T. Shintani, H. Matsuyama, N. Kurata, T. Ohara, Development of a chlorine- resistant polyamide nanofiltration membrane and its field-test results, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 106 (2007) 4174–4179.
  10. Shu, J. Y., K. Majamaa, S. Coker and T. Knoell (2014). Advancing reverse osmosis membrane performance in a water reuse application. A collaborative approach. AWWA/AMTA 2014 Membrane Technology Conference and Exposition.
  11. E.M. Vrijenhoek, S. Hong, M. Elimelech, Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 115–128.
  12. A.L. Ahman, B.S. Ooi, Properties-performance of thin-film composite membrane: study on trimesoyl chloride content and polymerization time, J. Membr. Sci. 255 (2006) 67–77.
  13. Q. Li, Z. Xu, I. Pinnau, Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by biopolymers in wastewater secondary effluent: role of membrane surface properties and initial permeate flux, J. Membr. Sci. 290 (2007) 173–181.
  14. G.-D. Kang, Y.-M. Cao, Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: a review, Water Res. 46 (2012) 584–600.
  15. H. Choi, J. Park, T. Tak, Y.-N. Kwon, Surface modification of seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) membrane using methyl methacrylate-hydroxy poly(oxyethylene) methacrylate (MMA-HPOEM) comb-polymer and its performance, Desalination 291 (2012) 1–7.
  16. T. Ishigami, K. Amano, A. Fujii, Y. Ohmukai, E. Kamio, T. Maruyama, H. Matsuyama, Fouling reduction of reverse osmosis membrane by surface modification via layer-by-layer assembly, Sep. Purif. Technol. 99 (2012) 1–7.
  17. S. Kasemset, A. Lee, D.J. Miller, B.D. Freeman, M.M. Sharma, Effect of polydopamine deposition conditions on fouling resistance, physical properties, and permeation properties of reverse osmosis membranes in oil/water separation, J. Membr. Sci. 425–426 (2013) 208–216.
  18. K. Akamatsu, T. Furue, F. Han, S. Nakao, Plasma graft polymerization to develop low-fouling membranes grafted with poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate), Sep. Purif. Technol. 102 (2013) 157–162.
Make sure you submit a unique essay

Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Cite this paper

Ag/chitosan coating enhances polyamide RO membranes. (2022, February 21). Edubirdie. Retrieved November 21, 2024, from https://edubirdie.com/examples/improvement-of-polyamide-reverse-osmosis-membranes-by-coating-with-ag-chitosan-nanodispersion-prepared-by-gamma-radiation/
“Ag/chitosan coating enhances polyamide RO membranes.” Edubirdie, 21 Feb. 2022, edubirdie.com/examples/improvement-of-polyamide-reverse-osmosis-membranes-by-coating-with-ag-chitosan-nanodispersion-prepared-by-gamma-radiation/
Ag/chitosan coating enhances polyamide RO membranes. [online]. Available at: <https://edubirdie.com/examples/improvement-of-polyamide-reverse-osmosis-membranes-by-coating-with-ag-chitosan-nanodispersion-prepared-by-gamma-radiation/> [Accessed 21 Nov. 2024].
Ag/chitosan coating enhances polyamide RO membranes [Internet]. Edubirdie. 2022 Feb 21 [cited 2024 Nov 21]. Available from: https://edubirdie.com/examples/improvement-of-polyamide-reverse-osmosis-membranes-by-coating-with-ag-chitosan-nanodispersion-prepared-by-gamma-radiation/
copy

Join our 150k of happy users

  • Get original paper written according to your instructions
  • Save time for what matters most
Place an order

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via support@edubirdie.com.

Check it out!
close
search Stuck on your essay?

We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.