Slavery may have been gathered up as the motivation of the American Civil War, however, the start of the debate started in the hour of the Revolution with a weakened decentralized government under the Articles of Confederation. Later increased momentum as a regional expansion set Americans against one another on discussing whether the new states ought to be slave states or free states, it doubted the intensity of the Federal government regarding state rights and realized instability in the solidarity of the United States as a country. The conflict of the American Civil War started with states’ rights being detached and thrived with the choice on whether slavery should spread westbound or be equally distributed in the Louisiana Purchase an area, however in the remainder of the westbound territory. A conventional struggle has been led by the new way of thinking of “Total War”. Although the expression itself was not coined until the twentieth century; historians of history have recommended that the Civil War had formed into such contention by late 1862. James McPherson has distinguished that phases in the escalation of the war. President Abraham Lincoln thought about the battle as an insignificant local revolt, effectively upheld by just a minority of Southerners, with could be met with a constrained demonstration of power. The inability to crush the rebels in 1861 clarified Lincoln of that idea and the Federal system was reached out to the control of a confederate area. This was to be accomplished without intimidating slavery or some other Southern establishments. Proceeded with Confederate military achievement saw this technique replace in 1862 with an attention on the destruction of radical armed forces. Before long a short time later, Federal techniques were focused on broadening out that destruction to the economic resource that supported the Confederate war application. The South’s defeat meant, for McPherson, expressing enslavement, the interest for unconditional surrender is a vital segment of an approach of Total War. There are also reasons for how the Civil War started. The Civil War started because of the cause of slavery, secession, and Manifest Destiny. There is also another reason that many other individuals are wondering about the Civil War in the North and South Side. The question that should be known is why is the Civil War considered the first modern war? It was considered the first modern war because it was the first war after the industrial revolution, more technologies were invented, and modern weapons were used. It was the war that transformed our country. The Civil War is the first modern war because of many reasons such as the resource, the economy, and the technology of war.
Contrasting both the North and Southside, both sides had certain disadvantages and advantages during the Civil War. On the north side, a few advantages were in Industrialized factories because of their large mass production supplies and invention. They had more population compared with the South which implies they have more troopers and more help, and everybody cooperated to achieve things together and not the only one. They had a solid navy force and their navy force was there for the insurance and they would do well in railroads implying that it was easy to transport people, supplies, troops, and equipment. The disadvantage on the Northside during the Civil War as they had weak inspiration implying that they were not battling for a reason, yet they just required one reason for them to get it. The officials were not forceful enough on the grounds that many neglected to press their enemies when they had the bit of the advantage. Additionally, they were battling on a new area on the ground that most Northerners has never been in the South, poor communication, and long supply line hampered the North and accepted the war would be over rapidly. The advantages on the Southside were home-field advantages meaning they knew the land. They had extraordinary military men who were smart of utilizing weapons or how weapons work and the Southside was used to the climate because, in the Southside, it was extremely hot. The disadvantages of the Southside during the Civil War as they had weak leadership skills, no navy, fewer men and supplies, few factories, less money, and a weaker government.
The first reason why the Civil War is considered the first modern war is because of their resource. “…slowly assemble a narrative from a patchwork of published induction rosters, military service diaries, and death certificates, but your search might suffer from spotty record keeping. Some battle details, for instance, might be buried in federal archives.” (Berman 40) This implies North and South were neither arranged yet the Northside appeared that they appreciate and support in people and material assets. The North has material assets, for example, having cash and credit, factories, food production, mineral resource, and transport. On the Southside, they were for the most part battling for home, medicine, clothes, and weapons, and the main thing that was expected to do without outliving the enemy. Eventually, the war flare-up stimulated patriotism. With preparing armed forces there was a gigantic errand that Union oversaw superior to the confederacy.
The second reason why the Civil War is considered the first modern war is because of the economy. “With the disappearance of the factorage system as a casualty of the war, a system of wholesale merchants developed whose agents, “drummers,” supplied the southern general store.” (Clark 424-433) This means that in the South, war was changed by America’s financial system and Union accounts were raised by the tariff increase, new expenses, and tax, and the first income tax, acquired by selling bonds, printing cash, excused banking and money, wartime monetary strategies, railroaders, and agents, extended power and size of the federal government. This likewise implies the rich soil and warm air of the South made it ideal for gigantic scale farms and yields like tobacco and cotton. Since agriculture was so productive couple of the Southerners saw a necessity for mechanical headway. Eight percent of the work power tackled the homestead. Although two-thirds of the Southerners claimed no slaves, by 1860 the South peculiar institution. In the meantime, on the Northside, war was financially flourishing, yet South soaked in an emergency, confederate economic policies, acquired vigorously to find the war, however not heavy taxes on planters, instead of printed enormous measure of paper cash inflation. Likewise, in the North, transportation was a lot easier which boasted more than two-thirds of the railroad tracks in the nation, and the economy was on a rise.
The last reason why the Civil War is considered the first modern war is because of the technology that the Civil War had. “The debate over why the North won the Civil War has been going on for a century and a half and probably will not end anytime soon. Bridging the historiography of both the war and technology. (Petty 6-7) This means that every one of the technologies that were utilized during the Civil War led the North Side to win. The innovations that were utilized during the Civil War made the North Win, and they are advanced change fighting, railroads, Ironclads telegraphs, observation balloons, crude hand, grenades, submarines, rifles, trenches, favored protective power, high casualties, medical care, high death rate, present-day utilization of purposeful publicity to activate general feelings, current media like paper and telegraph photo that caught stunning truth of the war, and a surgeon’s kit that was used in the Civil War. Since the North had won the Civil War, there ought to have been something behind on what had made them win the Civil War. With the assistance of railroads, everything is by all accounts better for the North. The railroads help the North win since it renewed the military, they had the option to have 25,000 troops come at one time, and it would only take them 7 days to move troops or materials over. The telegraph was another reason the North won, and it was because it was such a great and it was simpler to speak with each other, they had the options to give directions and requests, they realize what’s going on the opposite side of the nation and informing turned out to be simple.
As a result, these mechanical advancements did not give the Civil War army forces an edge in battle yet but essentially re-imagined the basic idea of fighting. The Civil War saw the beginning of numerous techniques for fighting that are still being used today very nearly 150 years after the fact. Even though we would consider these developments rough by today’s standards, they demonstrated destructive on the front line since technologies were a long way in front of strategies and care for the injured.
As time goes on, there are changes that have happened to the Civil War and asking ourselves about what a new U.S Civil War might look like today. It states “It’s easy to imagine that a second civil war might proceed like the first: two institutionalized factions wielding state militaries against each other prescribed strategic fronts. Generals would choose aside, those with the most troops and firepower at their disposal would claim victory. The outcome, we imagine, would likely be a winner-take-all restructuring of the United States.” (Arkenberg) This means that there could be a chance of having a second Civil War but there is an average percentage of having one. For the United States, the state of future homeland conflict will be unbalanced, conveyed, and heterogeneous. A contemporary country struggle would likely self-make with carious powerful groups sorted out by computerized devices around ideological and affinity systems. It would almost certainly be a patchwork of partnered revolt gatherings and partners taking part in light clashes along the covering edges of their systems, blended with periodic high esteem dread assault against soft and hard targets. Such gatherings are a lot littler than ordinary militaries and where they need the capability, they employ transgression. In the Ted Talk “War and what comes after” a woman named Clemantine Warmariya discusses her life in a war. “In 2006, after 12 years being separated away from my family, and then seven years knowing that they were dead and them thinking that we were dead…” (Warmariya) Knowing how her life was like that, imagine how the lives of the people of the United States would feel like if they were in Clemantine shoes. Knowing that losing a family member for that long and then knowing that they are still alive and out there waiting. Whatever happens after a war, there are survivors because knowing how crazy and hectic a war is, there are always survivors.