Introduction
The relationship between religious beliefs and morality is morality and religion. Many religions have useful mechanisms for personal conduct that direct followers in the determination of right or wrong. In this essay we will discuss that Is morality based on religion. Why does this happen? Can morality not depend on religion? Why not? Why not? Is it desirable to rely on religion on our moral rules and principles? Does it need to be? Many people think that the morality of most religious people derives from their faith. And people who are intensely religious should also wonder how atheists can have morals.
Explanation
The word 'morality' as in this entry is unlike 'ethics.' Philosophers at different times (Kant, Hegel, and later R.M. Hare and Bernardo Williams for instance) have drawn numerous parallels. Etymologically however the word 'moral' is derived from the Latin mos., meaning tradition, which is a Greek ethos translation which means almost the same and is the source of the word 'ethics.' The term is used for the latter. The two words are synonymous for contemporary non-technical use while 'ethics' is somewhat more technically oriented and correlated with the prescribed practices of many professions (for example, medical ethics). In either case, this entry suggests that morality is a collection of customs and practices influencing our thoughts about how to live or what a decent human life is. 'Religion' is very divisive. Again, from etymology, we can understand. I think values may be religious-based, but I also think they should not be religious-based. I do not think that people necessarily look at the morally correct or incorrect every day. It's unusual for the people who do. It all depends on how an individual was brought up, learned, and evolved with or with people with whom they grew up. I believe it is desirable for those people who were raised in a religious household to believe that morality depends on faith. However, I do not think religion for religious reasons is important.
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
God is designed as a lawgiver, with laws that we are to follow, in the main theistic traditions such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. He is not pushing us to comply. We have been formed as free agents so that we can either follow or deny his commandments. But we must obey the rules of God if we are to live as we ought to live. Some theologians also evolved this idea into a theory of the essence of the right and the wrong, called the theory of the Divine Command. Frank Herbert, Children of Dune has beautifully said:
“To Suspect your Own Mortality is to Know the Beginning of Terror; To Learn Irrefutably that you are mortal is to Know the End of Terror.” In essence, this theory says that moral correctness means God's order, and moral misguided means God's forbidden. There are a few appealing aspects of this theory. The old issue of ethics is overcome instantly. Ethics is not just a matter of human emotions or social behaviours. It is perfectly objective whether anything is right: it is right if God commands it, wrong if God prohibits it. In addition, the Theory of Divine Order proposes an answer to the recurrent question of why anyone should have trouble with morality. Why don't you ignore ethics and look after yourself? If immorality breaches the commandments of Heaven, there is a clear answer: you will be held accountable the day of final reckoning.
But there are significant theory issues, atheists cannot, of course, support this, because they do not believe that God exists. But also, for the faithful, there are difficulties. One can wonder how society is if there is no social moral code. It is like society. People will most certainly not feel remorse or anger. For example, in a society that does not comply with the social moral code, there will be no moral duty to remember a birthday or anniversary or that women have the right to fair pay and work. Obligations, obligations, and rights, maybe only in a legal context do not exist. The principles of equality and justice would not exist in a society without a moral code. In essence, people will not judge their own actions or blame others for their behaviour. The French philosopher Albert Camus asked me for his opinion on morality and gave a clear response: 'When somebody told me to write a book on morality, it would take a hundred pages and 99 would be zero. On the last page I will write: 'I know only one responsibility and that is to love.' And for the rest, I say no.' (Camus)
“You cannot believe in god until you believe in yourself.” It seems clear that without faith and moral code it is possible to live. Suppose these same people file into their worship site every day to pay homage to God (you may believe in many gods or a powerful creator of heaven and earth). Often you can hear yourself praying to God for support and praising Him for your good fortune. They also offer God sacrifices, often in the form of money used for the building of beautiful temples and churches, and sometimes by acts that they think that God would allow such support for those in need. If people derive their moral values from their conception of God, it may be more like thinking about God's thoughts than about their own convictions.
So, from where, if not from religion, do our values come? This is a complex question: genetic and cultural elements tend to exist. Certainly, these cultural elements are influenced by religion. Even the athletes who always take up the mothers of their society are very affected by religions that they do not even attribute to. So, religion is not morals, it is only morals that influence religion. Religion is not religion as well. When granted moral dilemmas, atheists do not rate differently from religious people. Obviously, we have all got morals. Morality comes from the same position whether you are religious.
Conclusion
In the end, though many people feel religion-based to be a moral person, this is not the case. Morality and faith are not mutually dependent. Moral choices should be taken through rational consideration and recognition of the repercussions for unethical conduct, whether they be disgust, remorse, incarceration, or even the fear of God. Many people still feel that they do the right thing since it is only the right thing to do. The point of this dilemma is that the gods are irrelevant to the moral problem, either because they give arbitrary moral instructions, or because they apply to an independent standard of moral values that also is available to people. This last argument is a significant contribution to the general well-being of mankind from philosophy. In short, without religion, you can be healthy. Understanding this has freed people, religious or not with good thoughts so that they can unite in a more equal, fairer, and fairer world. They can do this generally by living a healthy life. They will do so more directly by promoting human rights and better world organizations. Thinking people know a long time ago that morality is separate from religion because it comes from human empathy and universal fellow feeling. This is a crucial mindset among those who recognize themselves as humanists.
Stuck on your essay?
