Should schools sell fast food instead of traditionally cooked, cafeteria food?
Across the United States, students that attend a four-year traditional college would either prefer eating in the campus cafeteria, or a fast-food chain like Pizza Hut or McDonald's. With the students being able to choose between the two, this affects those eating fast food by becoming a direct effect on their health and a problem for the colleges. Whether there are students that eat at the cafeteria or a fast-food chain, they seem to be unconcerned if they are putting anything nutritional that’s needed for their body. There's a possibility that this would cause concerns for the states that have these traditional colleges and situations.
Is there anything that can prove how unhealthy it is to eat fast food? Due to the controversy between fast foods and cafeteria foods, there's an article name 'Fast-Food Examination' that explains what is going on within a fast-food chain and what causes people to convert to eating those foods. In this article, I noticed that there are three traps that all fast-food chains use for Simple Sugars, Saturated Fats, and Hydrogenated Oils. Could there be fast food in schools? The author infers 'The more research my students conducted, the more convinced they became. Having a fast-food cafeteria wouldn't be such a good idea after all.'. The substances that are used in the foods that are being cooked are speculative because of how they can negatively affect your body.
Eating at these fast-food chains can also cause these students to consume a lot of calories when eating those foods. In another article called 'Fast-Food Nation; School Cafeteria Food Fight: [Home Edition]', the author pointed out something that was a turning point because it states, 'More school-lunch bills are kicking around California right now than fad diets.'. This issue seems like a problem with the government wanting to provide healthy food options with not enough money to support it. The article also states more information about the bills by stating 'Though each bill makes a contribution, the different pieces of legislation do step on each other’s toes a bit, and it's still hard to fathom the reasoning that would ban sodas but allow fruit juices that have even more sugar and calories but little or no additional nutrition.'. With this information, it does prove that there’s a belief of taking away products that are ‘junk’ is more important than taking away products with more sugar and not nutritional. Meanwhile, the article believes that Schools can teach what good nutrition looks like without learning it with chips, candy, and other junk food. But, will it possibly harm schools in different states across the United States?
While the author of this article does bring up the concern of how it might impact these schools by stating 'This school year, Texas began an even tougher approach than those of California's bills.'. This article mainly talks about the differences between presenting a bill and being able to have enough money to support this action. Being able to approach this bill with enough support is a problem for different states throughout the United States. With the importance of these schools wanting to provide a good nutritional meal for the students, there should be enough support for this action. Even though, there are states that will allow this bill, but, the important thing is how long will they keep the bill. Allowing the schools to provide a nutritional meal for students within the cafeteria would be helpful causing more students to want to eat the cafeteria food.
Save your time!
We can take care of your essay
- Proper editing and formatting
- Free revision, title page, and bibliography
- Flexible prices and money-back guarantee
With schools not having fast food, it causes people to realize eating fast food is what students expect. Why are students wanting to get food from a fast-food spot instead of eating at the school cafeteria? In the article 'Did Somebody Say School Lunch?; Fast-Food Franchises have Invaded the Cafeteria. Kids Expect the Choices these Days.', the food director for the Des Moines district states, 'If they don't get what they want at school, they'll go across the street to a convenience store or a fast-food spot.'. The food director implies, if they don't serve what the students like, there's a possibility that they will leave the school to get what pleases them. Throughout this issue, I view this as a student we should be given the option to have something different, this would allow every student to pick whatever food option they desire. With there being convenience stores that offer those options can grab their attention, causing them to want those items.
I agree that schools should sell fast food because this would expand the choices that students would have to pick from. Being able to have a different variety of food choices to pick from can be useful and helpful for every student that enters the cafeteria. There are still some pros and cons to it, but it'll work. Having different types of food provided a change in students' perspectives on what they should eat. Understanding that there are some pros and cons to the situation of having fast food at schools would eventually become a positive thing that happens for all the schools.
As a student, I do see that there's common ground between fast-food and cafeteria food based on what I've seen over the years. Within the transition from High School to College, you can notice how things change within the cafeteria are different by noticing what types of foods are being served. Every day at High School you're probably receiving something you wouldn't want versus at a College. Even though, being in College, you are given the freedom to choose what you want with the different variety of foods there. Students are being affected because we do believe that our voices should be heard. If you notice, High School students' voices aren't being heard, and are not given the same choices that College students are given which causes them to go get fast food.
In conclusion, having schools sell fast food would become a growth factor for schools across the United States, causing the number of students eating in the cafeteria to increase. Allowing fast food places to serve students would allow them to have a better food variety instead of them having to eat traditional food. Knowing what type of effect, it'll have on the students is important as well. Being able to pick what you want to eat is always the best thing to do because you know that you’re not going to waste anything.
Work Cited
- Baird, Rod. 'Fast-Food Examination.' Current Health 1, vol. 29, no. 6, 02, 2006, pp. 8-11. ProQuest, http://ezproxy.cpcc.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.cpcc.edu/docview/209824356?accountid=10008.
- 'FAST-FOOD NATION; School Cafeteria Food Fight: HOME EDITION].' Los Angeles Times, Mar 26, 2005. ProQuest, http://ezproxy.cpcc.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.cpcc.edu/docview/421981878?accountid=10008.
- McGarvey, Carol. 'Did Somebody Say School Lunch?; Fast-Food Franchises have Invaded the Cafeteria. Kids Expect the Choices these Days.' Des Moines Register, Jan 26, 2000. ProQuest, http://ezproxy.cpcc.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.cpcc.edu/docview/889996746?accountid=10008.
Stuck on your essay?
