The Honours In Animal Science
Australia remains one of the world’s largest producers of wool globally with approximately 70 million head of sheep as of 2018 (FAOUN, 2018) and national wool exports making up approximately 25 per cent of the wool sold on the global market holding an estimated value of $3.615 billion (Department of Agriculture water and environment, 2019).
As time goes on new challenges face the industry from natural disasters and drought natural to societal challenges like producing sustainable product and public perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animal welfare is becoming a national issue as a recent nationwide survey requested by the Department of Agriculture found that out of its 1,521 respondents “95% of people view farm animal welfare to be a concern and 91% want at least some reform” (Futureye, 2018). These consumer beliefs have giving traction to several organisations, most well-known of which include the RSPCA, the Animal Justice Party and Animals Australia, who have begun campaigning and strongly opposing the methods and husbandry practices of the industry particularly on the procedures of castration, mulesing and docking.
With both societal expectations and the expectations of organisations many Australian brands are restricting the product that they purchase depending on the treatment of the animals used to make said products (Terzon, 2020 & Woolworths Group, 2019), with this now comes an economical challenge for the industry to face.
The hormone cortisol is a primary physiological indicator of pain in sheep as the glucocorticoid hormone is released in response to stress (Hecter and Pincus 1954). changes in the cortisol plasma concentration have also been studied to have negative effects on sheep particularly in regards to handling procedures (Kilgour and de Langen 1970). Cortisol however can be affected periodic fluctuations (Tapp et al 1984) and other influences that would not be considered negative to the sheep (Colborn et al 1991) and therefore accurate cortisol levels should be taken from samples following the procedure (Kilgour and de Langen 1970) and to include control groups in the experimental design.
Studies by Lester et al (1991) and Kent et al (1993) demonstrated an increase in cortisol levels of castrated lambs compared to their control uncastrated counterparts.
Behavioural pain indicators have been used by studies to assess pain following husbandry practices (Molony & Kent, 1997 & Molony et al., 1993) and define a lamb’s response or husbandry procedures. And the lack or routine behaviour is considered by Anil et al (2002) as a critical indicator of pain
Escaping behaviours can also provide a good indicator of the received pain of the procedure for the lamb as a study by Molony and Kent (1997) suggest that the amount of agitated behaviour shown may echo the severity of the process meaning the greater the attempts to flee or avoid the procedure the greater the pain experienced is. If the lamb has grown tired from escape behaviour it may move onto more passive ways to avoid the pain it is experiencing (Molony & Kent, 1997). In a similar study by Molony et al (1993) the opposite is also observed, as lambs that had just gone through castration and docking procedures minimised movement and stood still or lay down in order to reduce stimulating sensitive areas where the procedures took place, in this case, the more severe the pain, the more still and animal became. Apart from a lack of movement lambs who have just been through husbandry procedures have also been noted to exhibit abnormal walking behaviours and postures including, unsteady walking, hunching their back while they stand and fully extending their legs while lying down (Molony & Kent, 1997). Molony et al (1993) also noted lambs appearing drowsy with a lack of alertness even when nudged by ewe mothers.
Facial expressions are another form of behavioural pain indictor and a Sheep Pain Facial Expression Scale (SPFES) was developed by McLennan, et al (2016) as a way for farm staff to assess pain associated with footrot and mastitis. Multiple studies (Molony & Kent, 1997, Dinniss et al., 1999, Thornton & Waterman-Pearson, 1999) have identified behaviours associated specifically with sheep who have undergone castration and docking procedures, these behaviours include licking or biting the damaged area, lip-curling, as well as increased motor activities like pacing, rolling, , jumping, kicking and stamping. These behaviours are very rarely seen in lambs and such are associated with pain (Dinniss et al., 1999).
Rubber rings (Banding) A rubber ring is placed above the testicles, around the neck of the scrotum eventually resulting in the testicles and scrotum to shrivel up and fall off in a few weeks.
Surgical castration A sharp knife or scalpel is used to remove the bottom one-third of the scrotal sac. The testicles are removed and the wound is allowed to heal.
Emasculator castration The spermatic cord is crushed, which destroys the blood vessels, thus depriving the testicles of blood supply and causing them to shrivel up and die.
Described by the Australian Veterinary Association (2016) as a method to reducing unwanted breeding, castration has in turn exclaimed by Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA) as a procedure that allows greater control over the herd genetic makeup through selective mating. MLA also claims castration also results in less aggressive male rams reducing bruising, injuries whilst making them generally safer to handle for farm staff.
Knife A sharp knife is used to cut the tail down to the desired length.
Hot iron The hot iron method involves severing the tail and cauterizing it simultaneously, using a heated docking iron.
Rubber ring (Banding) A rubber ring is placed along the tail, around eventually resulting a loss of blood supply to the tail leading to the tail shrivelling up and falling off.
The tail of a docked lamb should be docked to the third palpable joint or to the tip of the vulva in ewes, any shorter and lambs have higher chances to suffer from a rectal prolapse (Thomas et al 2003). A bloodless castratior
Studies have demonstrated that the use of a local anaesthetic following rubber ring castration has reduced the behavioural and physiological pain responses in lambs (Graham et al 1997, Moloney et al 1997, Thornton and Waterman-Pearson 1999). Initially it was suggested by Molony et al (1997) that the combination of a rubber ring and a bloodless castrator clamp is the most affective combination to reduce pain following castration procedures and a similar suggestion was proposed by Graham et al (1997) in regards to docking as this method saw a reduction in abnormal behaviours and cortisol peaks from rubber ring only castrated lambs (Thornton and Waterman-Pearson 1999). As the understanding of pain management increased so did the use of local anaesthetics which were found to be more effective in reducing pain than the band and clamp method
In regards to assessing pain in sheep while both physiological and behavioural methods of assessment are helpful and provide a level of understanding with the animal that is beneficial, they both have flaws in the way they are obtained. Physiological methods of measuring pain are generally invasive for example the common act of collecting blood involves moving and/or handling the animal leading to an increase of cortisol in the system (Haresign et al., 1995, Khalid et al., 1998) potentially skewing cortisol levels and thus test results. Behavioural methods of pain assessment may also have their respective consequences, Underwood (2002) demonstrated that prey animals generally hide their pain related behaviours in response to the threat of a predator. Being prey animals’ sheep may mask or show minimal signs of their pain in an effort to appear healthy to any human observers. Another flaw with behavioural observations is they must be done during daylight and generally involve watching only one individual animal at a time, this leads to the process becoming time consuming and slow.
With all this in mind a less intrusive and consistent method of assessing animal pain would be beneficial to the industry and potentially to farming as a whole.
At what price do other living beings gain the right to their lives? As humans, our species have completely stripped our Earth and the inhabitants of purity and tranquility from the day Eve picked an apple from the tree. As humans, our species have wreaked havoc on every organism and their home for the sake of humanity. As humans now in the 21st century, our species have yet to find the answer to the dichotomy of whether human lives are...
All medical products and drugs require preliminary testing to prove their effectiveness and safety for public use. This testing is conducted primarily on animals to prove their safety, then transferred to human subjects. Animal testing is not only safer than using human subjects, however, it is also more cost-effective. Businesses forced to undertake this animal testing by the FDA gravitate towards the most cost-effective option, making animal testing a multi-billion dollar market, to which it amassed almost $607 billion in...
Animal Testing Imagine that you are an animal housed in a laboratory, and from the day you were born, you have been stamped with a number and used as a research subject. Could you fathom having your body tested for the next cure of cancer? Could you envision having your body slaughtered? Throughout history animals have been used in scientific labs: to test for the next cures for certain diseases. We’ve come up with several new ways to find cures,...
Animal experimentation is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables which affect the behaviour or biological system through vigorous study. In 2018, 3.52 million procedures which involved living animals were carried out in the United Kingdom(1). 1.8 million of them were for experimental purposes. These procedures included using non-human animals in scientific studies for purposes such as basic research and the development of treatments, safety testing of pharmaceuticals and other substances. The rest were...
Every year, over 100 million animals are killed by horrible testing in U.S. laboratories due to animal testing (PETA). Facial Botox is a common beauty enhancer that is frequently tested on animals. The animals are injected in their stomach with different dosages of the toxin in order to see which dose kills the animals. Then, while they are fully awake, they die slowly and suffocate from paralysis. Animals suffer and die for cosmetics every year, yet it says it is...
Studies in the beauty industry have shown that the over 170,000 vulnerable rabbits have experienced pain in laboratories around the U.S. annually (Nava-Martinez 53). Animal testing in the cosmetic industry consists of chemicals intentionally being seeped in numerous places of an animal’s body to monitor any damage to the body that may occur (Doyle). An initial thought of animal testing in the cosmetic industry is that the companies are required to utilize animals as subjects in testing their products, but...
According to Aysha Akhtar, certified neurologist and preventive medicine/public health specialist, “Annually, more than 115 million animals are used worldwide in experimentation or to supply the biomedical industry.” Animal experimentation is an animal experiment or test where live animals are forced to undergo something that will most likely cause them pain and suffering. This type of experiment usually leads to distress or lasting harm. According to the Cruelty-Free International program, “Animals used in experiments are usually bred for this purpose...
Introduction Imagine watching scientists insert various needles into you while you are sitting there, wide awake, in excruciating pain, knowing very well that there is nothing you can possibly do to remove yourself from this situation. Well guess what? That is exactly what animals such as mice, rats, hamsters and monkeys frequently go through. Therefore, I strongly believe that animal testing should be banned. This is due to the fact that animal testing is extremely cruel and unethical, that animals...
This comes as a result of the need to test cosmetics, new drugs and the effects of chemicals on living organisms before they reach the public mass market. It comes as no surprise however, that this has caused massive uproar with animal activists and pet owners globally, arguing that there are many other alternatives to animal testing that could be used instead of harming and wasting the lives of animals. Companies such as Lush, The Body Shop and NYX are...
01 / 09
Fair Use Policy
EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via firstname.lastname@example.org.
We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.