|
Topics:
|
|
|---|---|
Words: |
828 |
Pages:
|
2
This essay sample was donated by a student to help the academic community. Papers provided by EduBirdie writers usually outdo students' samples.
|
Cite this essay
Download
The twentieth century was an era of hostility amongst two racial gatherings, African Americans and Caucasians, in the United States. Racial discrimination began in the former Confederate states, the states of the south. Racial equality issues were the topic most frequently discussed in apolitical areas and political areas. The two most renowned activists of the social equality battle were Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X. In spite of the fact that these pioneers had similar outcomes as a top priority, their methods, rationalities, and standards varied. Their fundamental contrasts focused on their ability to utilize or not to utilize viciousness to accomplish their true objectives.
These two social liberties pioneers had unmistakable differentiating contrasts in their methods. Malcolm X’s perspective or political belief was molded by early traumatic experiences produced by a discriminatory group. His home was scorched by the Ku Klux Klan, which brought about the homicide of his dad. This single act of prejudice brought up one of the most renown social rights activists of the time. Malcolm X was incredulous of the orderly, moderate methodology that Martin Luther King was taken to end isolation. Malcolm X continuously demonstrated a feeling of anger when speaking of equal rights instead of the usual peaceful approach. Malcolm X stated, 'Battle whoever gets in our way, to realize the total freedom of individuals of African drop here in the Western Hemisphere, and first here in the United States.' He believed that only through violence could equal right for all be achieved. Although he never said that desperate times call for desperate measures, he didn’t condone the idea either. Malcolm X never advocated the use of savagery as a means to reach his but he never stood up against it. Malcolm X's procedure of particular peacefulness demonstrates the interests that he felt to achieve a response to the prejudice blacks were confronting. He went poorly and look for brutality, however under certain conditions; he felt blacks would be advocated in striking back. He often pressed his followers to make it known their goals and to achieve it.
Martin Luther King Jr. on the other hand had a more attractive method and idea of reaching racial equality than Malcolm X.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are very prominent African American individuals throughout history. They fought for what they stood for but in many different ways. As we all know in history there are no two great men that are alike. Their many beliefs may have blossomed from the households they came from and how they grew up. King grew up in a middle class family and was well educated. While, Malcolm X grew up in an underprivileged environment that was very hostile with barely any schooling. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence, throughout his entire ministry. He always stood his ground, and he stood out because eventhough he may have been physically attacked, he never reacted with violence. Martin Luther King Jr. followed the Christian faith. Malcolm X was a Muslim, and believed in Muslim principles. His most famous line was “By any Means Necessary”. He believed in fighting back physically. Whatever had to be done to get freedom he was all for it whether it be violence or nonviolence. Although later in life he visited Jerusalem, and met other Muslims. He changed his views, and became nonviolent.
One of the most famous civil rights acts was the March on Washington, which portrays the different perspectives of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. The March on Washington took place on August 28, 1963. Over 20,000 people came to march from Washington to the Lincoln memorial in Washington D.C. This march happened to be one of Martin Luther King Jr.’s greatest accomplishments throughout his life. This event is where he took the crown for the face of the civil rights movement. Even in a time of violence, King would never act out. King wanted all the races to come together for the hatred andviolence to be put to a halt. Malcolm X had a different perspective regarding the march. He felt that integration would destroy the black and the white man. He felt that American blacks should be more concerned with helping each other. He felt blacks should start by giving the same race self-respect first. He did not agree with what King had to say, he felt that kings dream was not a dream but a nightmare.
MLK’s approach to civil rights/equality was non-violent protesting, speaking out for non-violence, passive resistance, and what he called, “weapons of love”. However, Malcolm X’s approach to civil rights/equality was extremely different. He was suspicious of whites, willing to use “by any means necessary” to achieve equality. He was a segregationist until he went to Mecca. The commonality that they both share is that they both wanted equal rights for African Americans they just went down different paths to receive those rights.
Get your paper done in as fast as 3 hours, 24/7.
Fair Use Policy
EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via support@edubirdie.com.
Stuck on your essay?
